Literature DB >> 23450502

Evaluation of the CHADS2 risk score on short- and long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after syncope.

Martin Huth Ruwald1, Anne-Christine Ruwald, Christian Jons, Morten Lamberts, Morten Lock Hansen, Michael Vinther, Lars Køber, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Jim Hansen, Gunnar Hilmar Gislason.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Syncope risk stratification is difficult and has not been implemented clinically. HYPOTHESIS: The CHADS2 score can be applied as a risk stratification tool for predicting mortality after an episode of syncope.
METHODS: All patients discharged from emergency departments with a first-time diagnosis of syncope from 2001 to 2009 where identified from nationwide registers in Denmark and matched on sex and age with a control population. Risk of all-cause or cardiovascular death was analyzed by multivariable Cox models.
RESULTS: A total of 37,705 patients were included. There were a total of 7761 deaths (21%), of which 52% were cardiovascular vs 27 862 (15%) deaths in the control population. The risk of cardiovascular death was significantly increased with increasing CHADS2 score (CHADS2 score: 1-2, hazard ratio [HR]: 9.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.25-10.07; CHADS2 score: 3-4, HR: 17.32, 95% CI: 15.42-19.47; CHADS2 score: 5-6, HR: 26.66, 95% CI: 21.40-33.21) relative to CHADS2 score of 0. A CHADS2 score of 0 was associated overall with very low event rates (15.1 deaths per 1000 person-years) but was associated with increased relative risk in the syncope population compared to controls. Syncope predicted 1-week, 1-year, and long-term mortality across CHADS2 scores compared to controls but did not reach significance in CHADS2 scores of 5 to 6.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing CHADS2 score significantly predicts mortality in patients discharged with a diagnosis of syncope, and a CHADS2 score of 0 was associated with a very low absolute mortality. Compared to controls, syncope was associated with increased short- and long-term mortality, particularly in the lower CHADS2 scores.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23450502      PMCID: PMC6649503          DOI: 10.1002/clc.22102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  5 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary Review of Risk Scores in Prediction of Coronary and Cardiovascular Deaths.

Authors:  Jose B Cruz Rodriguez; Khan O Mohammad; Haider Alkhateeb
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Usefulness of a low CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc score to predict normal diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with an acute exacerbation of previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tyler W Barrett; Robert L Abraham; Wesley H Self
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Unexplained Syncope and Diagnostic Yield of Tests in Syncope According to the ICD-10 Discharge Diagnosis.

Authors:  Martin Huth Ruwald; Morten Lock Hansen; Morten Lamberts; Michael Vinther; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Jim Hansen; Gunnar Hilmar Gislason
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-10-12

4.  CHADS 2 Scores in the Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Cushing's Syndrome.

Authors:  Yuh-Feng Wang; Mei-Hua Chuang; Tzyy-Ling Chuang; Kung-Yung Huang; Shaw-Ruey Lyu; Chih-Yuan Huang; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.257

5.  Prediction of Mortality in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation and Comparison of CHADS2, CHA2DS2, and CCI Scores.

Authors:  Hsun Yang; Yi-Hsin Chen; Teng-Fu Hsieh; Shiun-Yang Chuang; Ming-Ju Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.