STUDY OBJECTIVES: Besides their well-established role in circadian rhythms, our findings that the forebrain expression of the clock-genes Per2 and Dbp increases and decreases, respectively, in relation to time spent awake suggest they also play a role in the homeostatic aspect of sleep regulation. Here, we determined whether time of day modulates the effects of elevated sleep pressure on clock-gene expression. Time of day effects were assessed also for recognized electrophysiological (EEG delta power) and molecular (Homer1a) markers of sleep homeostasis. DESIGN: EEG and qPCR data were obtained for baseline and recovery from 6-h sleep deprivation starting at ZT0, -6, -12, or -18. SETTING: Mouse sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Male mice. INTERVENTIONS: Sleep deprivation. RESULTS: The sleep-deprivation induced changes in Per2 and Dbp expression importantly varied with time of day, such that Per2 could even decrease during sleep deprivations occurring at the decreasing phase in baseline. Dbp showed similar, albeit opposite dynamics. These unexpected results could be reliably predicted assuming that these transcripts behave according to a driven damped harmonic oscillator. As expected, the sleep-wake distribution accounted for a large degree of the changes in EEG delta power and Homer1a. Nevertheless, the sleep deprivation-induced increase in delta power varied also with time of day with higher than expected levels when recovery sleep started at dark onset. CONCLUSIONS: Per2 and delta power are widely used as exclusive state variables of the circadian and homeostatic process, respectively. Our findings demonstrate a considerable cross-talk between these two processes. As Per2 in the brain responds to both sleep loss and time of day, this molecule is well positioned to keep track of and to anticipate homeostatic sleep need. CITATION: Curie T; Mongrain V; Dorsaz S; Mang GM; Emmenegger Y; Franken P. Homeostatic and circadian contribution to EEG and molecular state variables of sleep regulation. SLEEP 2013;36(3):311-323.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Besides their well-established role in circadian rhythms, our findings that the forebrain expression of the clock-genes Per2 and Dbp increases and decreases, respectively, in relation to time spent awake suggest they also play a role in the homeostatic aspect of sleep regulation. Here, we determined whether time of day modulates the effects of elevated sleep pressure on clock-gene expression. Time of day effects were assessed also for recognized electrophysiological (EEG delta power) and molecular (Homer1a) markers of sleep homeostasis. DESIGN: EEG and qPCR data were obtained for baseline and recovery from 6-h sleep deprivation starting at ZT0, -6, -12, or -18. SETTING:Mouse sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Male mice. INTERVENTIONS:Sleep deprivation. RESULTS: The sleep-deprivation induced changes in Per2 and Dbp expression importantly varied with time of day, such that Per2 could even decrease during sleep deprivations occurring at the decreasing phase in baseline. Dbp showed similar, albeit opposite dynamics. These unexpected results could be reliably predicted assuming that these transcripts behave according to a driven damped harmonic oscillator. As expected, the sleep-wake distribution accounted for a large degree of the changes in EEG delta power and Homer1a. Nevertheless, the sleep deprivation-induced increase in delta power varied also with time of day with higher than expected levels when recovery sleep started at dark onset. CONCLUSIONS:Per2 and delta power are widely used as exclusive state variables of the circadian and homeostatic process, respectively. Our findings demonstrate a considerable cross-talk between these two processes. As Per2 in the brain responds to both sleep loss and time of day, this molecule is well positioned to keep track of and to anticipate homeostatic sleep need. CITATION: Curie T; Mongrain V; Dorsaz S; Mang GM; Emmenegger Y; Franken P. Homeostatic and circadian contribution to EEG and molecular state variables of sleep regulation. SLEEP 2013;36(3):311-323.
Authors: Robert L Sack; Dennis Auckley; R Robert Auger; Mary A Carskadon; Kenneth P Wright; Michael V Vitiello; Irina V Zhdanova Journal: Sleep Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Kathryn Moynihan Ramsey; Jun Yoshino; Cynthia S Brace; Dana Abrassart; Yumiko Kobayashi; Biliana Marcheva; Hee-Kyung Hong; Jason L Chong; Ethan D Buhr; Choogon Lee; Joseph S Takahashi; Shin-Ichiro Imai; Joseph Bass Journal: Science Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jo Vandesompele; Katleen De Preter; Filip Pattyn; Bruce Poppe; Nadine Van Roy; Anne De Paepe; Frank Speleman Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2002-06-18 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Anne-Marie Chang; Andrew C Bjonnes; Daniel Aeschbach; Orfeu M Buxton; Joshua J Gooley; Clare Anderson; Eliza Van Reen; Sean W Cain; Charles A Czeisler; Jeanne F Duffy; Steven W Lockley; Steven A Shea; Frank A J L Scheer; Richa Saxena Journal: Chronobiol Int Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Janine El Helou; Erika Bélanger-Nelson; Marlène Freyburger; Stéphane Dorsaz; Thomas Curie; Francesco La Spada; Pierre-Olivier Gaudreault; Éric Beaumont; Philippe Pouliot; Frédéric Lesage; Marcos G Frank; Paul Franken; Valérie Mongrain Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Matthew J McGinley; Martin Vinck; Jacob Reimer; Renata Batista-Brito; Edward Zagha; Cathryn R Cadwell; Andreas S Tolias; Jessica A Cardin; David A McCormick Journal: Neuron Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 17.173