Literature DB >> 23450240

Impact of cytolysis following transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Vladimir Marquez1, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Claire Wartelle-Bladou, Louis Bouchard, Pierre Perrault, Philippe Grégoire, Gilles Pomier-Layrargues.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is increasingly used as a treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cytolysis, which may occur within days following the procedure is due to either necrosis of the tumour or of the non-tumoral parenchyma. Therefore it may influence either tumour response or liver function or both. We evaluated the impact of cytolysis after TACE on tumour response, incidence of hepatobiliary complications and overall survival.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 157 patients with liver disease who underwent 271 treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cytolysis was defined as an increase of AST value above 100 IU/L with at least doubling of the baseline value. The associations between cytolysis and radiologic tumor response two months following each treatment and adverse hepatobiliary events were estimated using generalized estimating equations models. Comparison of 18 months survival after a first treatment of chemoembolization between the groups with and without cytolysis was performed using the proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Cytolysis occurred in 198 out of 271 cases and was associated with a favourable radiological response (OR 1.90, 1.03-3.54) at two months compared to non-cytolysis with no difference in the occurrence of adverse hepatobiliary events. The adjusted hazard ratio for overall survival was 1.33 times greater in the group with cytolysis compared to non-cytolysis (0.45-3.90).
CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of cytolysis was associated with a favorable radiological response, but had no impact on short-term adverse events and on survival at 18 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytolysis; cohort; hepatocellular carcinoma; transarterial chemoembolization

Year:  2013        PMID: 23450240      PMCID: PMC3562629          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  28 in total

1.  Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver.

Authors:  J Bruix; M Sherman; J M Llovet; M Beaugrand; R Lencioni; A K Burroughs; E Christensen; L Pagliaro; M Colombo; J Rodés
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  Transarterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Antibiotic prophylaxis and clinical meaning of postembolization fever.

Authors:  A Castells; J Bruix; C Ayuso; C Brú; X Montanyà; L Boix; J Rodès
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the CLIP, Okuda, and Child-Pugh staging systems in a cohort of 257 patients in Toronto.

Authors:  I Levy; M Sherman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  A prospective study regarding the complications of transcatheter intraarterial lipiodol chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Annie O Chan; Man-Fung Yuen; Chee-Kin Hui; Wai-Kuen Tso; Ching-Lung Lai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  A P Venook; R J Stagg; B J Lewis; J L Chase; E J Ring; T P Maroney; D C Hohn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Maria Isabel Real; Xavier Montaña; Ramon Planas; Susana Coll; John Aponte; Carmen Ayuso; Margarita Sala; Jordi Muchart; Ricard Solà; Joan Rodés; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A comparison of lipiodol chemoembolization and conservative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Chemoembolization followed by liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma impedes tumor progression while on the waiting list and leads to excellent outcome.

Authors:  Ivo W Graziadei; Heiko Sandmueller; Peter Waldenberger; Alfred Koenigsrainer; Karin Nachbaur; Werner Jaschke; Raimund Margreiter; Wolfgang Vogel
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients.

Authors:  K Okuda; T Ohtsuki; H Obata; M Tomimatsu; N Okazaki; H Hasegawa; Y Nakajima; K Ohnishi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Postchemoembolisation syndrome--tumour necrosis or hepatocyte injury?

Authors:  S J Wigmore; D N Redhead; B N J Thomson; E J Currie; R W Parks; K K Madhavan; O J Garden
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Post-Embolization Syndrome Complicated by Hypertensive Emergency and Severely Elevated Transaminases.

Authors:  Simon Kashfi; Elizabeth Murdakhayev; Razia Rehmani; Shorabh Sharma
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.