Literature DB >> 23450211

Genome sequence of the orange-pigmented seawater bacterium Owenweeksia hongkongensis type strain (UST20020801(T)).

Thomas Riedel1, Brittany Held, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Alla Lapidus, Hope Tice, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Jan-Fang Cheng, Cliff Han, Roxanne Tapia, Lynne A Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Manfred Rohde, Brian J Tindall, John C Detter, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Hans-Peter Klenk, Nikos C Kyrpides.   

Abstract

Owenweeksia hongkongensis Lau et al. 2005 is the sole member of the monospecific genus Owenweeksia in the family Cryomorphaceae, a poorly characterized family at the genome level thus far. This family comprises seven genera within the class Flavobacteria. Family members are known to be psychrotolerant, rod-shaped and orange pigmented (β-carotene), typical for Flavobacteria. For growth, seawater and complex organic nutrients are necessary. The genome of O. hongkongensis UST20020801(T) is only the second genome of a member of the family Cryomorphaceae whose sequence has been deciphered. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 4,000,057 bp long chromosome with its 3,518 protein-coding and 45 RNA genes is a part of the GenomicEncyclopedia ofBacteriaandArchaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteroidetes; Cryomorphaceae; Flavobacteria; GEBA; Gram-negative; aerobic; mesophilic; motile; non-fermentative; orange-pigmented sea water; rod-shaped

Year:  2012        PMID: 23450211      PMCID: PMC3570807          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.3296896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain UST20020801T (= DSM 17368 = NRRL B-23963 = JCM 12287) is the type strain of the species [1] in the monotypic genus [1]. The genus was named after Owen B. Weeks for his work on and during the 1950s to 1970s [1]. The species epithet points to Hong Kong, P. R. China, the place where the stain was isolated [1]. Strain UST20020801T was first isolated in August 2002 from seawater samples collected from Port Shelter in Hong Kong during a study of the bacterial diversity in Hong Kong coastal sea water. Members of the phylum are widely distributed in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Compared to free-living bacteria, they were more frequently attached to aggregates [2,3] and occurred during algae blooms [4,5]. Representatives of the phylum , especially of the class , are well-known to efficiently degrade and consume high-molecular-mass organic matter [6-11]. Recently, the family was proposed to constitute a branch within the phylum [12]. This family encompasses the marine genera , , [12], [1], [13], [14], and “Phaeocystidibacter” [15] as well as the freshwater-living genus [16]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for UST20020801T, together with the description of the genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of UST20020801T was compared using NCBI BLAST [17,18] under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [19]. The relative frequencies of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [20]) were determined, weighted by BLAST scores. The only named genus in the list was (1 hit in total). Regarding the single hit to a sequence from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 99.9%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 99.8%. No hits to sequences with other species names were found. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.) The highest-scoring environmental sequence was EU328017 ('dynamics during bioremediation crude oil contaminated moderate saline soil clone B76'), which showed an identity of 93.2% and an HSP coverage of 99.9%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples which yielded hits were 'marine' (3.0%), 'lake' (2.9%), 'depth' (2.7%), 'water' (2.6%) and 'zone' (2.5%) (249 hits in total) and corresponded with the habitat from which strain UST20020801T was isolated. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome do not differ from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AB125062).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of relative to the type strains of the other species within the family . The tree was inferred from 1,409 aligned characters [21,22] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [23]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [24] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 400 ML bootstrap replicates [25] (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [26] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [27] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [28].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of relative to the type strains of the other species within the family . The tree was inferred from 1,409 aligned characters [21,22] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [23]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [24] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 400 ML bootstrap replicates [25] (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [26] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [27] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [28].
Table 1

Classification and general features of UST20020801T according to the MIGS recommendations [29] and NamesforLife [30].

MIGS ID     Property      Term      Evidence code
      Domain Bacteria      TAS [31]
      Phylum Bacteroidetes      TAs [32,33]
      Class Flavobacteria      TAS [34-36]
     Current classification      Order Flavobacteriales      TAS [33,37,38]
      Family Cryomorphaceae      TAS [12]
      Genus Owenweeksia      TAS [1]
      Species Owenweeksia hongkongensis      TAS [1]
      Strain UST20020801      TAS [1]
     Gram stain      negative      TAS [1]
     Cell shape      rod-shaped      TAS [1]
     Motility      motile      TAS [1]
     Sporulation      none      TAS [1]
     Temperature range      mesophile, 4-37°C      TAS [1]
     Optimum temperature      25-33°C      TAS [1]
     Salinity      1.0-7.5% NaCl (w/v), 0-100% sea water      TAS [1]
MIGS-22     Oxygen requirement      aerobe      TAS [1]
     Carbon source      yeast extract, peptone, starch      TAS [1]
     Energy metabolism      heterotroph      TAS [1]
MIGS-6     Habitat      Seawater      TAS [1]
MIGS-15     Biotic relationship      free-living      TAS [1]
MIGS-14     Pathogenicity      none      NAS
     Biosafety level      1      TAS [39]
MIGS-23.1     Isolation      sea water (sand-filtered)      TAS [1]
MIGS-4     Geographic location      Port Shelter, Hong Kong, China      TAS [1]
MIGS-5     Sample collection time      August 2002      TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1      Latitude       22.341      NAS
MIGS-4.2     Longitude      114.281      NAS
MIGS-4.3     Depth      5 m      TAS [1]
MIGS-4.4     Altitude      not reported

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [40].

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [40]. UST20020801T is a Gram-negative, halophilic, non-flagellated, motile, and rod-shaped bacterium (Figure 2) [1]. Colonies are orange, convex, smooth, glistening and translucent with an entire margin [1]. Cells are 0.3-0.5 µm in width and 0.5-4.0 µm in length [1]. The strain does not sporulate [1]. Cells are strictly aerobic heterotrophs requiring Na+, Mg2+, sea salts and yeast extract or peptone for growth [1]. Growth occurs between 4°C and 37°C with an optimum at 25°C-33°C [1]. The pH range for growth is 5.2-9.0 with an optimum at pH 6.0-8.0 [1]. The salinity range for growth is 1.0-7.5% NaCl as well as 15-100% sea-water [1]. Yeast extract, peptone or starch is required for growth [1]. Ampicillin (10 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), erythromycin (10 µg), penicillin G (2U), rifampicin (10 µg), streptomycin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg) and polymyxin B (300 U) inhibited growth whereas cells were resistant to kanamycin (10 µg), gentamycin sulphate (10 µg) and spectinomycin (10 µg) [1]. Cells contain oxidase, catalase and alkaline phosphatase [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of UST20020801T

Scanning electron micrograph of UST20020801T

Chemotaxonomy

The fatty-acid profile of strain UST20020801T differs significantly from those of other members of the [1]. The principal cellular fatty acids of strain UST20020801T were the following saturated branched-chain fatty acids: iso-C15:0 G (28.0%), iso-C15:0 (18.7%), iso-C17:0 3-OH (18.1%), iso-C17:1 ω9c (7.3%), iso-C15:0 3-OH (4.9%), and a summed feature containing iso-C15:0 2-OH and/or C16:1ω7c (10.0%) [1]. Strain UST20020801T had the highest level of iso-C17:0 3-OH within . Compared with other members of the , the strain most similar to strain UST20020801T with respect to the content of straight-chain fatty acids and branched-chain hydroxy fatty acids is 1-22T [1]. In addition to phosphatidylethanolamine as major polar lipid, six unidentified lipids, one unidentified aminolipid, one unidentified aminophospholipid and one unidentified glycolipid were found in strain UST20020801T [15]. MK-6 was detected as a major respiratory quinone in strain UST20020801T [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [41], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of and project [42]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes On Line Database [27] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID     Property       Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality       Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used       Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library,       one 454 PE library (8.5 kb insert size), one Illumina library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms       Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage       300.0 × Illumina; 8.6 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30     Assemblers       Newbler version 2.3-PreRelease-6/30/2009, Velvet 1.0.13, phrap version SPS - 4.24
MIGS-32     Gene calling method       Prodigal
     INSDC ID       CP003156
     GenBank Date of Release       June 15, 2012
     GOLD ID       Gc02043
     NCBI project ID       65297
     Database: IMG-GEBA       2508501098
MIGS-13     Source material identifier       DSM 17368
     Project relevance       Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

strain UST20020801T, DSM 17368, was grown in DSMZ medium 1168 (YPS medium) [43] at 30°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using Jetflex Genomic DNA Purification kit (GENOMED 600100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer with an extended cell-lysis procedure, i.e. incubation with additional 80 µl protease K for one hour at 58°C. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [44].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [45]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly, consisting of 39 contigs in one scaffold, was converted into a phrap [46] assembly by making fake reads from the consensus to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (5,738.3 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [47] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 81.1 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [46] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [45], Dupfinisher [48], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 58 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using the software Polisher developed at JGI [49]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 308.6 x coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 291,505 pyrosequence and 75,503,620 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [50] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome-annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [51]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [52].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 4,000,057 bp long circular chromosome with a G+C content of 40.2% (Figure 3 and Table 3). Of the 3,563 genes predicted, 3,518 were protein-coding genes, and 45 RNAs; 33 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (67.9%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Figure 3

Graphical map of the chromosome. From outside to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content (black), GC skew (purple/olive).

Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute     Value     % of Total
Genome size (bp)     4,000,057     100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)     3,661,831     91.54%
DNA G+C content (bp)     1,609,363     40.23%
Number of replicons     1
Extrachromosomal elements     0
Total genes     3,563     100.00%
RNA genes     45     1.26%
rRNA operons     2
tRNA genes     38     0.93%
Protein-coding genes     3,518     98.74%
Pseudo genes     33     0.93%
Genes with function prediction (proteins)     2,301     64.58%
Genes in paralog clusters     1,516     42.55%
Genes assigned to COGs     2,279     63.96%
Genes assigned Pfam domains     2,263     66.32%
Genes with signal peptides     1,095     30.73%
Genes with transmembrane helices     822     23.07%
CRISPR repeats     0
Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    Value    %age      Description
J    155    6.2      Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    0    0.0      RNA processing and modification
K    139    5.6      Transcription
L    141    5.7      Replication, recombination and repair
B    1    0.0      Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    33    1.3      Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0    0.0      Nuclear structure
V    54    2.2      Defense mechanisms
T    147    5.9      Signal transduction mechanisms
M    233    9.3      Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N    13    0.5      Cell motility
Z    3    0.1      Cytoskeleton
W    0    0.0      Extracellular structures
U    45    1.8      Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport
O    107    4.3      Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    116    4.7      Energy production and conversion
G    71    2.9      Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    181    7.3      Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    57    2.3      Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    115    4.6      Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    114    4.6      Lipid transport and metabolism
P    127    5.1      Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    54    2.2      Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    337    13.5      General function prediction only
S    251    10.1      Function unknown
-    1,284    36.0      Not in COGs
Graphical map of the chromosome. From outside to center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content (black), GC skew (purple/olive).

Insights into the genome sequence

Genome analysis of strain UST20020801T revealed the presence of genes encoding an arylsulfatase A family protein (Oweho_0043), a bacteriophytochrome (light-regulated signal transduction histidine kinase (Oweho_0350), a cytochrome c2 and a cytochrome c oxidase cbb3 type (Oweho_2085)). Additional gene sequences of interest encode a homogenisate 1,2-dioxigenase (Oweho_2010), a haloacid dehalogenase superfamily protein (Oweho_2094) as well as a 2-haloalkanoic acid dehalogenase type II (Oweho_2503). The presence of these genes could indicate that strain UST20020801T plays a role in the respiratory degradation of recalcitrant compounds in its ecological niche. Further, a light-dependent regulation of metabolic activities using bacteriophytochrome as a sensor seems to be possible.
  33 in total

1.  Dynamics of bacterial community composition and activity during a mesocosm diatom bloom.

Authors:  L Riemann; G F Steward; F Azam
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Natural assemblages of marine proteobacteria and members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacter cluster consuming low- and high-molecular-weight dissolved organic matter.

Authors:  M T Cottrell; D L Kirchman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  The nomenclatural types of the orders Acholeplasmatales, Halanaerobiales, Halobacteriales, Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, Planctomycetales, Prochlorales, Sulfolobales, Thermococcales, Thermoproteales and Verrucomicrobiales are the genera Acholeplasma, Halanaerobium, Halobacterium, Methanobacterium, Methanococcus, Methanomicrobium, Planctomyces, Prochloron, Sulfolobus, Thermococcus, Thermoproteus and Verrucomicrobium, respectively. Opinion 79.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published--Validation List no. 118.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Lishizhenia caseinilytica gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine bacterium of the phylum Bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Ken W K Lau; Jianping Ren; Natalie L M Wai; Pei-Yuan Qian; Po-Keung Wong; Madeline Wu
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  Biochemical evidence that starch breakdown by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron involves outer membrane starch-binding sites and periplasmic starch-degrading enzymes.

Authors:  K L Anderson; A A Salyers
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  4 in total

1.  An Unusual Inverted Saline Microbial Mat Community in an Interdune Sabkha in the Rub' al Khali (the Empty Quarter), United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Christopher P McKay; Jon C Rask; Angela M Detweiler; Brad M Bebout; R Craig Everroad; Jackson Z Lee; Jeffrey P Chanton; Marisa H Mayer; Adrian A L Caraballo; Bennett Kapili; Meshgan Al-Awar; Asma Al-Farraj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Microbes on a Bottle: Substrate, Season and Geography Influence Community Composition of Microbes Colonizing Marine Plastic Debris.

Authors:  Sonja Oberbeckmann; A Mark Osborn; Melissa B Duhaime
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Richard L Hahnke; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Marina García-López; Supratim Mukherjee; Marcel Huntemann; Natalia N Ivanova; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  The water depth-dependent co-occurrence patterns of marine bacteria in shallow and dynamic Southern Coast, Korea.

Authors:  Yingshun Cui; Seong-Jun Chun; Seung Ho Baek; Minji Lee; Yunji Kim; Hyung-Gwan Lee; So-Ra Ko; Seungwoo Hwang; Chi-Yong Ahn; Hee-Mock Oh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.