Literature DB >> 23450022

Does pre-coating total knee tibial implants affect the risk of aseptic revision?

S A Bini1, Y Chen, M Khatod, E W Paxton.   

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of pre-coating the tibial component with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) on implant survival in a cohort of 16 548 primary NexGen total knee replacements (TKRs) in 14 113 patients. In 13 835 TKRs a pre-coated tray was used while in 2713 TKRs the non-pre-coated version of the same tray was used. All the TKRs were performed between 2001 and 2009 and were cemented. TKRs implanted with a pre-coated tibial component had a lower cumulative survival than those with a non-pre-coated tibial component (p = 0.01). After adjusting for diagnosis, age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, femoral coupling design, surgeon volume and hospital volume, pre-coating was an independent risk factor for all-cause aseptic revision (hazard ratio 2.75, p = 0.006). Revision for aseptic loosening was uncommon for both pre-coated and non-pre-coated trays (rates of 0.12% and 0%, respectively). Pre-coating with PMMA does not appear to be protective of revision for this tibial tray design at short-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23450022     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B3.27585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

1.  Comparative retrieval analysis of a novel anatomic tibial tray backside: alterations in tibial component design and surface coating can increase cement adhesions and surface roughness.

Authors:  Dominic T Mathis; Joshua Schmidli; Felix Amsler; Johann Henckel; Harry Hothi; Alister Hart; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.562

2.  The Effects of Cyclic Loading and Motion on the Implant-Cement Interface and Cement Mantle of PEEK and Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Lennert de Ruiter; Raelene M Cowie; Louise M Jennings; Adam Briscoe; Dennis Janssen; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Significant differences in rates of aseptic loosening between two variations of a popular total knee arthroplasty design.

Authors:  Michael Brown; Rohan Ramasubbu; Mark Jenkinson; James Doonan; Mark Blyth; Bryn Jones
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  High rate of tibial debonding and failure in a popular knee replacement : a follow-up review.

Authors:  David Keohane; Gerard A Sheridan; Eric Masterson
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-06

Review 5.  Risk factors for revision of total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Authors:  L L Jasper; C A Jones; J Mollins; S L Pohar; L A Beaupre
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.