PURPOSE: Best rehabilitation practices after hip fracture for people with dementia have not been established. A systematic review was conducted to determine current evidence for rehabilitation in this population, including residents in continuing care. METHODS: Standardized review methodology was used to search eight databases for literature on hip-fracture rehabilitation for people with dementia. Eligible studies included participants with dementia who had a hip fracture; performed a rehabilitation intervention; and evaluated one or more of function, ambulation, discharge location, or falls. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess validity. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included: five randomized controlled trials (RCTs), seven prospective cohort series, and one retrospective cohort study. Average quality ratings for RCTs and cohort studies were good and fair respectively. Participants with mild to moderate dementia receiving rehabilitation showed similar relative gains in function to those without dementia. Only one study examined the effect of rehabilitation among residents in continuing care. CONCLUSIONS: People with mild or moderate dementia may show improved function and ambulation and decreased fall risk after rehabilitation post hip fracture, similar to gains achieved by those without dementia. More research is required to ascertain the effect of rehabilitation in people with moderate to severe dementia, including those residing in continuing-care settings. Purpose: Best rehabilitation practices after hip fracture for people with dementia have not been established. A systematic review was conducted to determine current evidence for rehabilitation in this population, including residents in continuing care. Methods: Standardized review methodology was used to search eight databases for literature on hip-fracture rehabilitation for people with dementia. Eligible studies included participants with dementia who had a hip fracture; performed a rehabilitation intervention; and evaluated one or more of function, ambulation, discharge location, or falls. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess validity. Results: A total of 13 studies were included: five randomized controlled trials (RCTs), seven prospective cohort series, and one retrospective cohort study. Average quality ratings for RCTs and cohort studies were good and fair respectively. Participants with mild to moderate dementia receiving rehabilitation showed similar relative gains in function to those without dementia. Only one study examined the effect of rehabilitation among residents in continuing care. Conclusions: People with mild or moderate dementia may show improved function and ambulation and decreased fall risk after rehabilitation post hip fracture, similar to gains achieved by those without dementia. More research is required to ascertain the effect of rehabilitation in people with moderate to severe dementia, including those residing in continuing-care settings.
PURPOSE: Best rehabilitation practices after hip fracture for people with dementia have not been established. A systematic review was conducted to determine current evidence for rehabilitation in this population, including residents in continuing care. METHODS: Standardized review methodology was used to search eight databases for literature on hip-fracture rehabilitation for people with dementia. Eligible studies included participants with dementia who had a hip fracture; performed a rehabilitation intervention; and evaluated one or more of function, ambulation, discharge location, or falls. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess validity. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included: five randomized controlled trials (RCTs), seven prospective cohort series, and one retrospective cohort study. Average quality ratings for RCTs and cohort studies were good and fair respectively. Participants with mild to moderate dementia receiving rehabilitation showed similar relative gains in function to those without dementia. Only one study examined the effect of rehabilitation among residents in continuing care. CONCLUSIONS:People with mild or moderate dementia may show improved function and ambulation and decreased fall risk after rehabilitation post hip fracture, similar to gains achieved by those without dementia. More research is required to ascertain the effect of rehabilitation in people with moderate to severe dementia, including those residing in continuing-care settings. Purpose: Best rehabilitation practices after hip fracture for people with dementia have not been established. A systematic review was conducted to determine current evidence for rehabilitation in this population, including residents in continuing care. Methods: Standardized review methodology was used to search eight databases for literature on hip-fracture rehabilitation for people with dementia. Eligible studies included participants with dementia who had a hip fracture; performed a rehabilitation intervention; and evaluated one or more of function, ambulation, discharge location, or falls. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess validity. Results: A total of 13 studies were included: five randomized controlled trials (RCTs), seven prospective cohort series, and one retrospective cohort study. Average quality ratings for RCTs and cohort studies were good and fair respectively. Participants with mild to moderate dementia receiving rehabilitation showed similar relative gains in function to those without dementia. Only one study examined the effect of rehabilitation among residents in continuing care. Conclusions: People with mild or moderate dementia may show improved function and ambulation and decreased fall risk after rehabilitation post hip fracture, similar to gains achieved by those without dementia. More research is required to ascertain the effect of rehabilitation in people with moderate to severe dementia, including those residing in continuing-care settings.
Entities:
Keywords:
dementia; démence; fracture de la hanche; geriatrics; hip fractures; maladie d'Alzheimer; patients gériatriques; rehabilitation; réadaptation
Authors: Eleanor S McConnell; Carl F Pieper; Richard J Sloane; Laurence G Branch Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Eric J Lenze; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Mary Amanda Dew; Meryl A Butters; Joan C Rogers; Amy Begley; Charles F Reynolds; Michael C Munin Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Liang Feng; Samuel C Scherer; Boon Yeow Tan; Gribson Chan; Ngan Phoon Fong; Tze Pin Ng Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Gary Naglie; Catherine Tansey; James L Kirkland; Darryl J Ogilvie-Harris; Allan S Detsky; Edward Etchells; George Tomlinson; Keith O'Rourke; Barry Goldlist Journal: CMAJ Date: 2002-07-09 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Antonio De Vincentis; Astrid Ursula Behr; Giuseppe Bellelli; Marco Bravi; Anna Castaldo; Lucia Galluzzo; Giovanni Iolascon; Stefania Maggi; Emilio Martini; Alberto Momoli; Graziano Onder; Marco Paoletta; Luca Pietrogrande; Mauro Roselli; Mauro Ruggeri; Carmelinda Ruggiero; Fabio Santacaterina; Luigi Tritapepe; Amedeo Zurlo; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Barbara Resnick; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Gregory Hicks; Glen Ostir; N Jennifer Klinedinst; Denise Orwig; Jay Magaziner Journal: Rehabil Nurs Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 1.625
Authors: Barbara Resnick; Lauren Beaupre; Katherine S McGilton; Elizabeth Galik; Wen Liu; Mark D Neuman; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Denise Orwig; Jay Magaziner Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Lauren A Beaupre; Ellen F Binder; Ian D Cameron; C Allyson Jones; Denise Orwig; Cathie Sherrington; Jay Magaziner Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.098
Authors: Toby O Smith; Anthony W Gilbert; Ashwini Sreekanta; Opinder Sahota; Xavier L Griffin; Jane L Cross; Chris Fox; Sarah E Lamb Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-02-07
Authors: Paula M van Wyk; Charlene H Chu; Jessica Babineau; Martine Puts; Dina Brooks; Marianne Saragosa; Katherine S McGilton Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2014-09-16