BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between the use of azathioprine and risk of cancer in patients with non-thymoma myasthenia gravis (MG) in a nationwide setting. METHODS: Case-control study based on population-based registries. Cases were patients with MG with a first time diagnosis of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) registered during 2000-2009, and controls were patients with MG with no history of cancer. Prior use of azathioprine in cases and controls was assessed through prescription records (1995-2009). We used unconditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer associated with a high cumulative dose [≥ 1000 defined daily doses (DDD)] or long-term use (≥ 5 years) of azathioprine, compared with never use of the drug and adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: We identified 89 cases and 873 controls. The prevalence of ever use of azathioprine was similar among cases (39.3%) and controls (39.4%). We observed a slightly elevated OR for cancer overall associated with long-term use of azathioprine (1.22; 95% CI: 0.62-2.40, P = 0.56). The highest ORs were observed for use of 2000 DDD or more of azathioprine; however, these risk estimates were based on small numbers. CONCLUSIONS: Use of azathioprine in patients with non-thymoma MG may be associated with a slightly increased risk of cancer overall. Larger studies are necessary to address the risk of site-specific cancers.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between the use of azathioprine and risk of cancer in patients with non-thymoma myasthenia gravis (MG) in a nationwide setting. METHODS: Case-control study based on population-based registries. Cases were patients with MG with a first time diagnosis of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) registered during 2000-2009, and controls were patients with MG with no history of cancer. Prior use of azathioprine in cases and controls was assessed through prescription records (1995-2009). We used unconditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer associated with a high cumulative dose [≥ 1000 defined daily doses (DDD)] or long-term use (≥ 5 years) of azathioprine, compared with never use of the drug and adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: We identified 89 cases and 873 controls. The prevalence of ever use of azathioprine was similar among cases (39.3%) and controls (39.4%). We observed a slightly elevated OR for cancer overall associated with long-term use of azathioprine (1.22; 95% CI: 0.62-2.40, P = 0.56). The highest ORs were observed for use of 2000 DDD or more of azathioprine; however, these risk estimates were based on small numbers. CONCLUSIONS: Use of azathioprine in patients with non-thymoma MG may be associated with a slightly increased risk of cancer overall. Larger studies are necessary to address the risk of site-specific cancers.
Authors: Anne Zaremba; Eleftheria Chorti; Finja Jockenhöfer; Saskia Bolz; Selma Sirin; Martin Glas; Jürgen C Becker; Selma Ugurel; Alexander Roesch; Dirk Schadendorf; Elisabeth Livingstone; Tim Hagenacker; Lisa Zimmer Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Kelvin Y C Zheng; Chuan-Guo Guo; Irene O L Wong; Lijia Chen; Ho Yin Chung; Ka Shing Cheung; Wai K Leung Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 4.409