Literature DB >> 23448409

Posaconazole vs fluconazole/itraconazole in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Greece.

K Athanasakis1, I Petrakis, J Kyriopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) present a major issue in clinical practice, due to their high morbidity and mortality rates. In a pivotal multi-centre, randomized clinical trial, posaconazole prophylaxis prevented IFIs more effectively than did either fluconazole or itraconazole, and improved overall survival.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform an economic evaluation of the aforementioned therapeutic strategies for IFI prophylaxis in neutropenic patients, in the Greek healthcare setting.
METHOD: A decision analytic model was developed, which described the course of neutropenic patients under posaconazole or standard azole (fluconazole or itraconazole) treatment. Effectiveness data for each treatment regimen were derived from published results of a pivotal, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial. Cost and healthcare resources utilization data depict Greek clinical practice and are derived from official Greek sources, from a third party payer perspective.
RESULTS: Prophylaxis with posaconazole resulted in fewer IFIs (0.05 vs 0.11 per patient) compared to treatment with fluconazole or itraconazole, during the first 100 days from initiation of prophylaxis treatment. The cost per avoided IFI with posaconazole was €6455, while the incremental cost per life year gained (LYG) was estimated at €24,196. Extensive sensitivity analyses corroborated the base-case results. Possible limitations of the study are the exclusion of indirect and outpatient costs from the analysis and the inherent uncertainty with regards to the transferability of the clinical efficacy results of the clinical trial to the Greek healthcare setting.
CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of posaconazole for prophylaxis of IFIs neutropenic patients is a therapeutic strategy that provides superior clinical efficacy, while being cost-effective compared to alternative therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23448409     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2013.781028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  5 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. First-Generation Triazoles for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections Among High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies in China.

Authors:  Changcheng Shi; Jian Ye; Yaping Xie; Rong Dong; Weizhong Jin; Linling Wang; Yingying Fang; Qiyuan Shan; Nengming Lin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-17

2.  Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Pinki Mishra; Narendra Agrawal; Dinesh Bhurani; Nidhi Bharal Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 3.  Prevention of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients: the role of delayed-release posaconazole.

Authors:  Ahmet Soysal
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Preemptive Antifungal Therapy for Febrile Neutropenic Hematological Malignancy Patients in China.

Authors:  Wei Yuan; Jinhai Ren; Xiaonan Guo; Xiaoling Guo; Shengxin Cai
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-11-07

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole Tablets for Invasive Fungal Infections Prevention in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients in Spain.

Authors:  Rafael Cámara; Irmina Gozalbo; Manuel Jurado; Jaime Sanz; Belén Aragón; Santiago Grau
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.845

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.