Literature DB >> 23448330

Implementing evidence in an onco-haematology nursing unit: a process of change using participatory action research.

Eva Abad-Corpa1, Pilar Delgado-Hito, Julio Cabrero-García, Cristobal Meseguer-Liza, Carmen Lourdes Zárate-Riscal, Andrés Carrillo-Alcaraz, José Tomás Martínez-Corbalán, Amor Caravaca-Hernández.   

Abstract

AIM: To implement evidence in a nursing unit and to gain a better understanding of the experience of change within a participatory action research.
METHODS: Study design of a participatory action research type was use from the constructivist paradigm. The analytical-methodological decisions were inspired by Checkland Flexible Systems for evidence implementation in the nursing unit. The study was carried out between March and November 2007 in the isolation unit section for onco-haematological patients in a tertiary level general university hospital in Spain. Accidental sampling was carried out with the participation of six nurses. Data were collected using five group meetings and individual reflections in participants' dairies. The participant observation technique was also carried out by researchers. Data analysis was carried out by content analysis. The rigorous criteria were used: credibility, confirmability, dependence, transferability and reflexivity.
RESULTS: A lack of use of evidence in clinical practice is the main problem. The factors involved were identified (training, values, beliefs, resources and professional autonomy). Their daily practice (complexity in taking decisions, variability, lack of professional autonomy and safety) was compared with an ideal situation (using evidence it will be possible to normalise practice and to work more effectively in teams by increasing safety and professional recognition). It was decided to create five working areas about several clinical topics (mucositis, pain, anxiety, satisfaction, nutritional assessment, nauseas and vomiting, pressure ulcers and catheter-related problems) and seven changes in clinical practice were agreed upon together with 11 implementation strategies. Some reflections were made about the features of the study: the changes produced; the strategies used and how to improve them; the nursing 'subculture'; attitudes towards innovation; and the commitment as participants in the study and as healthcare professionals.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings throw light on the process of change in the healthcare sector. The results are useful to modify nursing practice based on evidence.
© 2013 The Authors. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2013 The Joanna Briggs Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23448330     DOI: 10.1111/1744-1609.12006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Evid Based Healthc        ISSN: 1744-1595


  3 in total

1.  Improvement of pressure ulcer prevention care in private for-profit residential care homes: an action research study.

Authors:  Enid Wy Kwong; Maria Sy Hung; Kevin Woo
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  A scoping review of full-spectrum knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks.

Authors:  Rosmin Esmail; Heather M Hanson; Jayna Holroyd-Leduc; Sage Brown; Lisa Strifler; Sharon E Straus; Daniel J Niven; Fiona M Clement
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 3.  Clinicians' experience of providing care: a rapid review.

Authors:  Maha Pervaz Iqbal; Elizabeth Manias; Laurel Mimmo; Stephen Mears; Briony Jack; Liz Hay; Reema Harrison
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.