Literature DB >> 23447481

A comparison of initial monotherapy with norepinephrine versus vasopressin for resuscitation in septic shock.

Mitchell J Daley1, Ishaq Lat, Katherine D Mieure, Heath R Jennings, Jesse B Hall, John P Kress.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early goal-directed therapy is a time-sensitive therapeutic algorithm with a tiered approach to target hypoperfusion and cardiovascular collapse within the first 6 hours of septic shock. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend norepinephrine or dopamine as the initial vasoactive agent for resuscitation in septic shock, reserving the administration of vasopressin as adjunctive therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vasopressin was noninferior to norepinephrine as the initial vasopressor to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) goal in the first 6 hours of shock onset.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated adults who received monotherapy with either norepinephrine or vasopressin as initial vasoactive therapy for the management of septic shock. Patients were excluded if the treatment arm was not monotherapy, if they were admitted to a cardiology or cardiothoracic surgery service, or if they lacked a comparator-based 1:1 frequency matching.
RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were included, 65 in each treatment arm. The proportion of patients who achieved a goal MAP in the vasopressin group was 63% (95% CI 51%-75%) and was 67.7% (95% CI 56%-79%) in the norepinephrine group. This observed difference between goal MAP attainment did not exceed the predefined noninferiority margin of -25% (CI for 4.7% difference -21.2% to 12%), suggesting noninferiority of vasopressin. No significant difference was identified between vasopressin and norepinephrine for final mean (SD) MAP achieved (75 [9.6] and 76.0 [8.2] mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.06) or the mean total change from baseline MAP to goal (14.1 [8.4] and 15.1 [9.1] mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressin was noninferior to norepinephrine for the achievement of a MAP goal in the first 6 hours from onset of septic shock. Further prospective analysis is warranted; however, the results are useful for consideration of alternative vasopressors in the setting of drug shortages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23447481     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1R442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  6 in total

1.  Did the beneficial renal outcomes with vasopressin VANISH?

Authors:  Gretchen L Sacha; Simon W Lam; Seth R Bauer
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

2.  Vasopressor and Inotropic Management Of Patients With Septic Shock.

Authors:  Sacha Pollard; Stephanie B Edwin; Cesar Alaniz
Journal:  P T       Date:  2015-07

Review 3.  Vasopressin versus norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor in septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yub Raj Sedhai; Dhan Bahadur Shrestha; Pravash Budhathoki; Waqas Memon; Roshan Acharya; Suman Gaire; Nisheem Pokharel; Swojay Maharjan; Ranjit Jasaraj; Amik Sodhi; Dipen Kadariya; Ankush Asija; Markos G Kashiouris
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-25

4.  Early versus delayed administration of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Xiaowu Bai; Wenkui Yu; Wu Ji; Zhiliang Lin; Shanjun Tan; Kaipeng Duan; Yi Dong; Lin Xu; Ning Li
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei-Hu Zhou; Qing Song
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2014-05-01

6.  Vasopressin in vasoplegic shock: A systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew J Webb; Mohamed O Seisa; Tarek Nayfeh; Patrick M Wieruszewski; Scott D Nei; Nathan J Smischney
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-12-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.