Literature DB >> 23446586

Anatomical variations of the saphenous and descending genicular artery perforators: cadaveric study and clinical implications for vascular flaps.

Kanit Sananpanich1, Pichitchai Atthakomol, Sirichai Luevitoonvechkij, Jirachart Kraisarin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With increasing use of free vascular flaps of the saphenous artery and descending genicular artery, the authors investigated the anatomical variations in cadavers.
METHODS: Thirty-one fresh cadaveric thighs were studied by anatomical dissection. The perforators and their source arteries were skeletonized along their courses to the superficial femoral artery and measured. The perforators' nomenclature and abbreviations were modified from the Gent consensus. The skin and bone perforators were evaluated for their role in skin, bone, and osteocutaneous flaps.
RESULTS: The descending genicular artery was noted in 27 thighs (87 percent) and gave rise to at least one skin perforator that could be used to develop an osteocutaneous flap. The chimeric pedicle length increased and the chimeric arm length decreased, as the descending genicular artery skin perforators were more distally located. The saphenous artery was noted in all 31 thighs, and in 16 (52 percent) it originated from the superficial femoral artery. Most musculocutaneous perforators of the saphenous artery were associated with the sartorius, whereas those of the descending genicular artery were associated with the vastus medialis. Superficial femoral artery skin perforators were noted in 10 thighs (32 percent). Two clinical cases, illustrating the use of the descending genicular artery vastus medialis perforator flap and of the distal-direct perforator osteocutaneous flap, are reported.
CONCLUSIONS: This study investigated the anatomical variations in the skin and bone perforators of the medial knee. Free skin or bone flaps were achieved in all specimens and osteocutaneous chimera flaps were achieved in 87 percent of the thighs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23446586     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c7067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Osteocutaneous proximal fibular flap: an anatomical and computed tomographic angiographic study of skin and bone perforators.

Authors:  Kanit Sananpanich; Artit Boonyalapa; Jirachart Kraisarin; Nuttaya Pattamapaspong
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Biceps femoris musculocutaneous flap for reconstruction of refractory ulceration at the popliteal fossa.

Authors:  Tadanobu Onishi; Shohei Omokawa; Takamasa Shimizu; Kanit Sananpanich; Yasuhito Tanaka; Tsutomu Kira; Keiichi Murata; Kanya Honoki
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-11-07

3.  The medial femoral condyle free flap: An excellent option for difficult cases: case series.

Authors:  Jorge I Quintero; Dylan Childs; Rodrigo Moreno
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-29

4.  Repair of knee deep burn wound with descending genicular artery-saphenous artery perforator flaps in elderly patients (a STROBE-compliant article).

Authors:  Wan-Feng Zhang; Ren-Chun Huang; Qiu-Fang Gao; Zi-Biao Li; Ya-Jun Ma; Xue-Tao Niu; Bin Ma; Ke-Yi Ren; Zhi-Zhong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Vascular coverage of the anterior knee region - an anatomical study.

Authors:  Lena Hirtler; Anke Lübbers; Claus Rath
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  Best Local Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

Authors:  Faris M AlMugaren; Changsik John Pak; Hyunsuk Peter Suh; Joon Pio Hong
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-30

7.  MEDIAL FEMORAL CONDYLE CORTICOPERIOSTEAL FLAP: ANATOMIC STUDY.

Authors:  Gustavo Bersani Silva; Matheus Teotonio Vellosa; Alvaro Baik Cho; Raquel Bernardelli Iamaguchi DA Costa; Olavo Pires DE Camargo; Rames Mattar
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.