Literature DB >> 23446508

Optimizing the closed suction surgical drainage system.

Katherine H Carruthers1, Bradley S Eisemann, Susan Lamp, Ergun Kocak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Closed suction drains are indicated in a wide array of postoperative settings, with many distinct drainage systems available to the surgeon. The purpose of this study was to compare the suction gradients achieved using 2 different sizes of suction reservoirs and 2 different techniques for generating negative pressure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drainage reservoirs of 100 and 400 ml were chosen to evaluate their ability to achieve suction. Suction was established in both sizes of drains by pressing the sides of the reservoir together or by pushing the bottom of the reservoir toward the top. Negative pressures were recorded with the reservoir empty, and after every 10-ml addition of saline. Averages were graphed to illustrate the applied suction over a range of drain volumes.
RESULTS: The 100-ml drainage system reached a peak suction of -117.6 mmHg, while the 400-ml drainage system reached only a peak suction of -71.4 mmHg. Both of the maximum suction readings were achieved using the full-squeeze technique. The bottom-pushed-in technique did not result in any sustained measurable levels of suction using either of the reservoir volumes.
CONCLUSIONS: Smaller drain reservoirs are more successful in generating a high initial suction than larger reservoirs, especially when the volume of fluid in the drain is relatively low. In all sizes of drains, compressing the sides of the reservoir is a far better technique for establishing negative pressure than pressing the bottom of the drain up toward the top.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23446508     DOI: 10.1097/PSN.0b013e31828425db

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Surg Nurs        ISSN: 0741-5206


  5 in total

Review 1.  Management of skin and subcutaneous tissue in complex open abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  I Khansa; J E Janis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  How Much Blood Could a JP Suck If a JP Could Suck Blood?

Authors:  Erin M Mamuyac; Andrew K Pappa; Brian D Thorp; Charles S Ebert; Brent A Senior; Adam M Zanation; Feng-Chang Lin; Adam J Kimple
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  A Method for Monitoring the Working States of Drainage Tubes Based on the Principle of Capacitance Sensing.

Authors:  Kai Luo; Wenpu Shi; Yinghao Chen; Bo Wang; Jialin Yao; Xing Yang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Passive Versus Active Intra-Abdominal Drainage Following Pancreatic Resection: Does A Superior Drainage System Exist? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lily J Park; Laura Baker; Heather Smith; Madeline Lemke; Alexandra Davis; Jad Abou-Khalil; Guillaume Martel; Fady K Balaa; Kimberly A Bertens
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  The 4 Principles of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ibrahim Khansa; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-12-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.