Literature DB >> 23446503

The contralateral prophylactic mastectomy decision-making process.

Sandra K Baker1, Deborah K Mayer, Noreen Esposito.   

Abstract

Women facing an early-stage breast cancer diagnosis may elect to have a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) to reduce the risk of developing a contralateral breast cancer. In the United States, CPM rates for all surgically treated women with stages I through III unilateral breast cancer increased dramatically from 1998 to 2003. In 1991, the National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel concluded that breast-conserving surgery is an appropriate and preferred treatment for the majority of women with stage I and II breast cancer because it provides survival rates equivalent to those of total mastectomy while preserving the breast. Owing to the near equivalence of the 2 surgical treatment options in terms of survival benefit and recurrence risk, surgical treatment for early-stage breast cancer qualifies as a "preference-sensitive decision" for which no one treatment is best (S. T. ; ). We performed a literature review to identify studies that examined CPM decision making in women facing an early-stage breast cancer diagnosis with the aim of determining the most influential factors affecting her surgical choice. Study outcome measures were largely based on demographic information retrospectively extracted from large databases representing trends rather than revealing influences reflecting preference-sensitive decision making. While we may know demographically, which women choose CPM, we do not know why. To better understand this increasing trend, which greatly impacts patient counseling, prospective research is needed using decision quality methods developed to illuminate factors influencing a woman's decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23446503     DOI: 10.1097/PSN.0b013e3182842424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Surg Nurs        ISSN: 0741-5206


  3 in total

1.  Shared Decision Making and the Use of Decision Aids.

Authors:  Martin Härter; Angela Buchholz; Jennifer Nicolai; Katrin Reuter; Fely Komarahadi; Levente Kriston; Birgit Kallinowski; Wolfgang Eich; Christiane Bieber
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Patient decision-making and clinical outcomes following endoscopic therapy or esophagectomy for Barrett's neoplasia.

Authors:  Robert Lockwood; Elissa Ozanne; Chin Hur; Patrick Yachimski
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 3.  Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Celia E Wills; Lisa D Yee; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.466

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.