Literature DB >> 23446202

The effect of provider density on lung cancer survival among blacks and whites in the United States.

Leah M Backhus1, Awori J Hayanga, David Au, Steven B Zeliadt.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer mortality rates may vary with access to specialty providers and local resources. We sought to examine the effect of access to care, using density of lung cancer care providers, on lung cancer mortality among blacks and whites in the United States.
METHODS: We examined U.S. county-level data for age-adjusted lung cancer mortality rates from 2003 to 2007. Our primary independent variable was per capita number of thoracic oncologic providers, adjusting for county-level smoking rates, socioeconomic status, and other geographic factors. Data were obtained from 2009 Area Resource File, National Center for Health Statistics, and the County Health Rankings Project.
RESULTS: Providers of lung cancer care were unevenly distributed among the U.S. counties. For example, 41.4% of the U.S. population reside in counties with less than four thoracic surgeons per 100,000 people, 23.4% in counties with 4 to 15 surgeons per 100,000 people, and 35.3% in counties with more than 15 surgeons per 100,000 people. Geographically, 4.3% of whites compared with 11.2% of blacks lived in high lung cancer mortality zones. Lung cancer mortality did not vary by density of thoracic surgeons or oncology services; however, higher primary care provider density was associated with lung cancer mortality reduction of 4.1 per 100,000 for whites.
CONCLUSION: Variation in provider density for thoracic oncology in the United States was not associated with a difference in lung cancer mortality. Lower mortality associated with higher primary care provider density suggests that equitable access to primary care may lead to reduced cancer disparities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23446202     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318287c24c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  6 in total

Review 1.  What is quality, and can we define it in lung cancer?-the case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Farhood Farjah; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

2.  The Effect of Gynecologic Oncologist Availability on Ovarian Cancer Mortality.

Authors:  Sherri L Stewart; Darryl Cooney; Shawn Hirsch; Lauren Westervelt; Thomas B Richards; Sun Hee Rim; Cheryll C Thomas
Journal:  World J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05-10

3.  Predictors of imaging surveillance for surgically treated early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Leah M Backhus; Farhood Farjah; Steven B Zeliadt; Thomas K Varghese; Aaron Cheng; Larry Kessler; David H Au; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography for primary care providers.

Authors:  Thomas B Richards; Mary C White; Ralph S Caraballo
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.907

5.  Primary Care Provider Density and Elective Total Joint Replacement Outcomes.

Authors:  Bella Mehta; Collin Brantner; Nicholas Williams; Jackie Szymonifka; Iris Navarro-Millan; Lisa A Mandl; Anne R Bass; Linda A Russell; Michael L Parks; Mark P Figgie; Joseph T Nguyen; Said Ibrahim; Susan M Goodman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-07-09

6.  Normalization of Exhaled Carbonyl Compounds After Lung Cancer Resection.

Authors:  Erin M Schumer; Matthew C Black; Michael Bousamra; Jaimin R Trivedi; Mingxiao Li; Xiao-An Fu; Victor van Berkel
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.330

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.