Literature DB >> 23446067

Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression for LSS: two-year outcomes.

Bohdan W Chopko1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this report was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of mild lumbar decompression for the treatment of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. This technique uses a percutaneous dorsal approach to remove small portions of ligament and lamina, thereby restoring space and decompressing the spinal canal.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-year data are reported for 45 patients treated with mild decompression at 11 US sites. Outcome measures included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index, and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. Safety was monitored throughout the procedural and follow-up period for all patients. Interim data are included for these patients at 1 week, 6 months, and 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of patients reported improvement in VAS at the end of the reporting period. At 2 years, patients demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of pain as measured by VAS, and improvement in physical function and mobility was significant as measured by Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index. Tukey honestly significant different test found significant improvement in all outcome measures from baseline to each follow-up interval. Further, major improvement occurred by 1-week follow-up and showed no difference between each subsequent follow-up, signifying considerable stability and durability of the initial result over time. No major device or intraprocedural adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: In this report of 2-year follow-up on 45 patients treated with mild percutaneous lumbar decompression, patients experienced statistically significant pain relief and improved functionality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23446067     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827fb803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  5 in total

Review 1.  Spinal Cord Stimulation, MILD Procedure, and Regenerative Medicine, Novel Interventional Nonopioid Therapies in Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Ken P Ehrhardt; Susan M Mothersele; Andrew J Brunk; Jeremy B Green; Mark R Jones; Craig B Billeaud; Alan David Kaye
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-03-19

Review 2.  The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Carolina G Fritsch; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Rafael Z Pinto; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan David Kaye; Kavita Manchikanti; Mark Boswell; Vidyasagar Pampati; Joshua Hirsch
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-02-01

4.  The Impact of Age on the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Nagy A Mekhail; Shrif J Costandi; Sherif Armanyous; Ricardo Vallejo; Lawrence R Poree; Lora L Brown; Stanley Golovac; Timothy R Deer
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2020-06-04

5.  The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild® Procedure: One-Year Results.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Shrif J Costandi; Edward Washabaugh; Timothy B Chafin; Sayed E Wahezi; Navdeep Jassal; Dawood Sayed
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.