Literature DB >> 23446014

Non-penetrating femtosecond laser intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy in patients with mixed astigmatism after previous refractive surgery.

Jan Venter1, Rodney Blumenfeld, Steve Schallhorn, Martina Pelouskova.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of the correction of mixed astigmatism with non-penetrating femtosecond laser intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy in patients with previous refractive surgery.
METHODS: One hundred twelve eyes that had low mixed astigmatism after excimer laser surgery, refractive lens exchange, or phakic intraocular lens implantation underwent intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy using paired symmetrical non-penetrating intrastromal arcuate keratotomies created 60 μm from the surface to 80% depth at 7 mm diameter. Outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), subjective refraction, and keratometry. A coupling ratio was calculated to assess the change in spherical equivalent. Average follow-up was 7.6 ± 2.9 months. Patients were divided into two groups: no excimer laser corneal ablation and previous excimer laser surgery. Preoperative and postoperative data were compared between groups and analyses were performed on the whole group of eyes.
RESULTS: Overall, the mean UDVA improved significantly from 0.18 ± 0.14 to 0.02 ± 0.12 logMAR (6/9 to ≈6/6 Snellen) (P < .01). The mean absolute subjective cylinder decreased significantly from 1.20 ± 0.47 diopters (D) preoperatively to 0.55 ± 0.40 D postoperatively (P < .01). Subjective sphere decreased significantly from +0.61 ± 0.33 to +0.17 ± 0.36 D (P < 0.01). The mean CDVA was -0.03 ± 0.08 logMAR (≈ 6/6 Snellen) preoperatively and -0.05 ± 0.09 logMAR (≈ 6/5 Snellen) postoperatively (P = .06). The coupling ratio was 0.92 ± 0.45. There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative and postoperative sphere, cylinder, UDVA, CDVA, and coupling ratio between groups. No surgical complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy was effective at reducing refractive error in patients where other surgical options were exhausted. Predictability and efficacy could be improved with nomogram refinement. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23446014     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130129-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  9 in total

1.  Clinical utility of femtosecond laser-assisted astigmatic keratotomy after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ryohei Nejima; Yukiko Terada; Yosai Mori; Miyuki Ogata; Keiichiro Minami; Kazunori Miyata
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Long-term outcomes of limbal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery: aberrometric analysis.

Authors:  Gaspare Monaco; Antonio Scialdone
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-31

Review 3.  Post-keratoplasty astigmatism management by relaxing incisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gaëlle Ho Wang Yin; Louis Hoffart
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-06

Review 4.  Femtosecond laser-assisted astigmatic keratotomy: a review.

Authors:  John S M Chang
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-12

5.  Novel method for preventing cyclorotation in Ziemer Femto LDV Z8 femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with Verion image-guided system.

Authors:  Hung-Yuan Lin; Ya-Jung Chuang; Pi-Jung Lin; Yi-Ju Ho
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-20

6.  Astigmatic Outcomes of Single, Non-Paired Intrastromal Limbal Relaxing Incisions During Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Based on a Custom Nomogram.

Authors:  Carter W Lim; Sohel Somani; Hannah H Chiu; Raj Maini; Eric S Tam
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-22

7.  Correction of preexisting astigmatism by penetrating arcuate keratotomy in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Kirti Rani; Ashok K Grover; Ashutosh K Singh; Tushar Grover; S P Garg
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 8.  Surgical options for correction of refractive error following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed A Abdelghany; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-16

9.  Precision and refractive predictability of a new nomogram for femtosecond laser-assisted corneal arcuate incisions.

Authors:  Jascha A Wendelstein; Peter C Hoffmann; Siegfried Mariacher; Tina Wingert; Nino Hirnschall; Oliver Findl; Matthias Bolz
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.988

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.