Stephanie T Johnson1, Eric R Van Tassell, Laura Tonnetti, Ritchard G Cable, Victor P Berardi, David A Leiby. 1. Transmissible Diseases Department, American Red Cross Holland Laboratory, Farmington, Connecticut; Biomedical Services Research Department, Northeast Division, American Red Cross, Farmington, Connecticut; Transmissible Diseases Department, American Red Cross Holland Laboratory, Rockville, Maryland; Research Division, Imugen, Norwood, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Babesia microti, an intraerythrocytic parasite, has been implicated in transfusion transmission. B. microti seroprevalence in Connecticut (CT) blood donors is approximately 1%; however, it is not known what percentage of donors is parasitemic and poses a risk for transmitting infection. Therefore, we determined the prevalence of demonstrable B. microti DNA in donors from a highly endemic area of CT and compared observed rates with concurrent immunofluorescence assay (IFA) testing results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood samples from consenting donors in southeastern CT were collected from mid-August through early October 2009 and tested by IFA for immunoglobulin G antibodies and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for B. microti DNA. IFA specificity was determined using blood donor samples collected in northwestern Vermont (VT), an area nonendemic for Babesia. RESULTS: Of 1002 CT donors, 25 (2.5%) were IFA positive and three (0.3%) were real-time PCR positive. Among the three real-time PCR-positive donors, two were also IFA positive, while one was IFA negative and may represent a window period infection. The two IFA- and real-time PCR-positive donors appeared to subsequently clear infection. The other real-time PCR-positive donor did not provide follow-up samples. Of 1015 VT donors tested by IFA, only one (0.1%) was positive, but may have acquired infection during travel to an endemic area. CONCLUSION: We prospectively identified several real-time PCR-positive blood donors, including an IFA-negative real-time PCR-positive donor, in an area highly endemic for B. microti. These results suggest the need to include nucleic acid testing in planned mitigation strategies for B. microti.
BACKGROUND:Babesia microti, an intraerythrocytic parasite, has been implicated in transfusion transmission. B. microti seroprevalence in Connecticut (CT) blood donors is approximately 1%; however, it is not known what percentage of donors is parasitemic and poses a risk for transmitting infection. Therefore, we determined the prevalence of demonstrable B. microti DNA in donors from a highly endemic area of CT and compared observed rates with concurrent immunofluorescence assay (IFA) testing results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood samples from consenting donors in southeastern CT were collected from mid-August through early October 2009 and tested by IFA for immunoglobulin G antibodies and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for B. microti DNA. IFA specificity was determined using blood donor samples collected in northwestern Vermont (VT), an area nonendemic for Babesia. RESULTS: Of 1002 CT donors, 25 (2.5%) were IFA positive and three (0.3%) were real-time PCR positive. Among the three real-time PCR-positive donors, two were also IFA positive, while one was IFA negative and may represent a window period infection. The two IFA- and real-time PCR-positive donors appeared to subsequently clear infection. The other real-time PCR-positive donor did not provide follow-up samples. Of 1015 VT donors tested by IFA, only one (0.1%) was positive, but may have acquired infection during travel to an endemic area. CONCLUSION: We prospectively identified several real-time PCR-positive blood donors, including an IFA-negative real-time PCR-positive donor, in an area highly endemic for B. microti. These results suggest the need to include nucleic acid testing in planned mitigation strategies for B. microti.
Authors: Matthew S Simon; Jared A Leff; Ankur Pandya; Melissa Cushing; Beth H Shaz; David P Calfee; Bruce R Schackman; Alvin I Mushlin Journal: Transfusion Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Andrew E Levin; Phillip C Williamson; James L Erwin; Sherri Cyrus; Evan M Bloch; Beth H Shaz; Debra Kessler; Sam R Telford; Peter J Krause; Gary P Wormser; Xiaoyan Ni; Haihong Wang; Neil X Krueger; Sally Caglioti; Michael P Busch Journal: Transfusion Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Joana C Silva; Emmanuel Cornillot; Carrie McCracken; Sahar Usmani-Brown; Ankit Dwivedi; Olukemi O Ifeonu; Jonathan Crabtree; Hanzel T Gotia; Azan Z Virji; Christelle Reynes; Jacques Colinge; Vidya Kumar; Lauren Lawres; Joseph E Pazzi; Jozelyn V Pablo; Chris Hung; Jana Brancato; Priti Kumari; Joshua Orvis; Kyle Tretina; Marcus Chibucos; Sandy Ott; Lisa Sadzewicz; Naomi Sengamalay; Amol C Shetty; Qi Su; Luke Tallon; Claire M Fraser; Roger Frutos; Douglas M Molina; Peter J Krause; Choukri Ben Mamoun Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 4.379