Literature DB >> 2344503

Relation between dose of bendrofluazide, antihypertensive effect, and adverse biochemical effects.

J E Carlsen1, L Køber, C Torp-Pedersen, P Johansen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relevant dose of bendrofluazide for treating mild to moderate hypertension.
DESIGN: Double blind parallel group trial of patients who were given placebo for six weeks and then randomly allocated to various doses of bendrofluazide (1.25, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg daily) or placebo for 12 weeks.
SETTING: General practices in Zealand, Denmark. PATIENTS: 257 Patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated hypertension, aged 25-70, who had a mean diastolic blood pressure of 100-120 mm Hg after receiving placebo for six weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in diastolic blood pressure and changes in biochemical variables (potassium, urate, glucose, fructosamine, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein A I, apolipoprotein B, and triglyceride concentrations).
RESULTS: All doses of bendrofluazide significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure to the same degree (10-11 mm Hg). Clear relations between dose and effect were shown for potassium, urate, glucose, total cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B concentrations. The 1.25 mg dose increased only urate concentrations, whereas the 10 mg dose affected all the above biochemical variables.
CONCLUSION: The relevant range of doses of bendrofluazide to treat mild to moderate hypertension is 1.25-2.5 mg a day. Higher doses caused more pronounced adverse biochemical effects including adverse lipid effects. Previous trials with bendrofluazide have used too high doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2344503      PMCID: PMC1662719          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6730.975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  9 in total

1.  EFFECTS OF ORAL DIURETICS ON RAISED ARTERIAL PRESSURE.

Authors:  W I CRANSTON; B E JUEL-JENSEN; A M SEMMENCE; R P JONES; J A FORBES; L M MUTCH
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1963-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Pharmacologic observations on a more potent benzothiadiazine diuretic (Be. 724-A).

Authors:  R V FORD; J NICKELL
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1960-02       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Antihypertensive effect and side-effects of bendroflumethiazide and propranolol.

Authors:  G Berglund; O Andersson; O Larsson; L Wilhelmsen
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1976

Review 4.  The effects of antihypertensive agents on serum lipids and lipoproteins.

Authors:  C K Lardinois; S L Neuman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-06

5.  Total body and serum potassium during prolonged thiazide therapy for essential hypertension.

Authors:  P R Wilkinson; H Issler; R Hesp; E B Raftery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-04-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A comparison of the effects of hydrochlorothiazide and captopril on glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  T Pollare; H Lithell; C Berne
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Single-agent and combination therapy of essential hypertension.

Authors:  M A Weber; J I Drayer
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Thiazide therapy is not a cause of arrhythmia in patients with systemic hypertension.

Authors:  V Papademetriou; J F Burris; A Notargiacomo; R D Fletcher; E D Freis
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-06

9.  Early changes in plasma and urinary potassium in diuretic-treated patients with systemic hypertension.

Authors:  V Papademetriou; M Price; E Johnson; M Smith; E D Freis
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

  9 in total
  62 in total

1.  Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association, British Hypertension Society, endorsed by the British Diabetic Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  [Dose-response relation: relevance for clinical practice].

Authors:  U Klinkhardt; S Harder
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-12-15

Review 3.  Challenges of prescribing low-dose drug therapy for older people.

Authors:  P A Rochon; J P Clark; J H Gurwitz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Monotherapy versus combination therapy as first line treatment of uncomplicated arterial hypertension.

Authors:  M Ruzicka; F H Leenen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  MRC trial of treating hypertension in older adults.

Authors:  A B Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-06-20

Review 6.  Thiazides in the 1990s.

Authors:  M Orme
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-30

Review 7.  Economic factors in the initiation of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  I Kawachi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Antihypertensive drugs and incidence of type 2 diabetes: evidence and implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Samuel Asfaha; Raj Padwal
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 9.  Anti-hypertensive drug treatment of patients with and the metabolic syndrome and obesity: a review of evidence, meta-analysis, post hoc and guidelines publications.

Authors:  Jonathan G Owen; Efrain Reisin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 10.  The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET). Rationale, methodology and comparison with previous trials.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; A E Fletcher; A Amery; J Coope; J G Evans; S Lightowlers; K O'Malley; A Palmer; J Potter; P Sever
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.