Z Xu1, X Qi, A K Dahl, W Xu. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Abstract
AIMS: Early detection of diabetes is important for the prevention of diabetic complications. The best adiposity index for indicating Type 2 diabetes mellitus remains unclear. We aimed to identify the optimal adiposity measure among BMI, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio to indicate undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Chinese adults. METHODS: A total of 7567 participants aged 20-79 years were included in this study. Impaired fasting glucose was defined as a fasting plasma glucose level of 6.1-6.9 mmol/l in participants without diabetes. Undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes was identified as fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/l when neither a history of diabetes nor use of hypoglycaemic drugs was present. Body weight, height, waist and hip circumferences were measured following standard procedures. Data were analysed using logistic regression and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Of the 7567 participants, 536 were defined as having impaired fasting glucose and 690 were patients with Type 2 diabetes, including 290 (3.8%) persons with undiagnosed diabetes. In multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratios of waist-to-height ratio (≥ 0.5) were stronger than BMI (≥ 24 kg/m²), waist circumference (≥ 85 cm in men and ≥ 80 cm in women) and waist-hip ratio (≥ 0.85) for undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose. Among the four indices, waist-to-height ratio ≥ 0.5 showed the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosing undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes (0.725, 95% CI 0.693-0.756) and impaired fasting glucose (0.662, 95% CI 0.638-0.687). CONCLUSIONS: By comparison with BMI, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio ≥ 0.5 may be the best indicator for undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose.
AIMS: Early detection of diabetes is important for the prevention of diabetic complications. The best adiposity index for indicating Type 2 diabetes mellitus remains unclear. We aimed to identify the optimal adiposity measure among BMI, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio to indicate undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Chinese adults. METHODS: A total of 7567 participants aged 20-79 years were included in this study. Impaired fasting glucose was defined as a fasting plasma glucose level of 6.1-6.9 mmol/l in participants without diabetes. Undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes was identified as fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/l when neither a history of diabetes nor use of hypoglycaemic drugs was present. Body weight, height, waist and hip circumferences were measured following standard procedures. Data were analysed using logistic regression and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Of the 7567 participants, 536 were defined as having impaired fasting glucose and 690 were patients with Type 2 diabetes, including 290 (3.8%) persons with undiagnosed diabetes. In multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratios of waist-to-height ratio (≥ 0.5) were stronger than BMI (≥ 24 kg/m²), waist circumference (≥ 85 cm in men and ≥ 80 cm in women) and waist-hip ratio (≥ 0.85) for undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose. Among the four indices, waist-to-height ratio ≥ 0.5 showed the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosing undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes (0.725, 95% CI 0.693-0.756) and impaired fasting glucose (0.662, 95% CI 0.638-0.687). CONCLUSIONS: By comparison with BMI, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio ≥ 0.5 may be the best indicator for undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose.
Authors: Robyn E Karlage; Carmen L Wilson; Nan Zhang; Sue Kaste; Daniel M Green; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Wassim Chemaitilly; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Melissa M Hudson; Kirsten K Ness Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Karl K Vanderwood; Mary Kaye Kramer; Rachel G Miller; Vincent C Arena; Andrea M Kriska Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2014-06-21 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Muhammed Savran; Mesut Engin; Orhan Guvenc; Hasan F Yüksek; Sadık Ahmet Sünbül; Tamer Turk; Yusuf Ata; Ufuk Aydın; Ahmet F Ozyazicioglu Journal: J Saudi Heart Assoc Date: 2021-02-10
Authors: Jousianny Patrício da Silva; Raquel Patrícia Ataíde Lima; Danielle de Carvalho Pereira; Cassia Surama de Oliveira Silva; Maria da Conceiço Rodrigues Gonçalves; Malaquias Batista Filho; Rosália Gouveia Filizola; Ronei Marcos de Moraes; Luiza Sonia Rios Asciutti; Maria José de Carvalho Costa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 3.390