Literature DB >> 23444899

Reorganization of laryngeal motoneurons after crush injury in the recurrent laryngeal nerve of the rat.

Ignacio Hernández-Morato1, Francisco J Valderrama-Canales, Gabriel Berdugo, Gonzalo Arias, Stephen McHanwell, José Sañudo, Teresa Vázquez, Arán Pascual-Font.   

Abstract

Motoneurons innervating laryngeal muscles are located in the nucleus ambiguus (Amb), but there is no general agreement on the somatotopic representation and even less is known on how an injury in the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) affects this pattern. This study analyzes the normal somatotopy of those motoneurons and describes its changes over time after a crush injury to the RLN. In the control group (control group 1, n = 9 rats), the posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA) and thyroarytenoid (TA) muscles were injected with cholera toxin-B. In the experimental groups the left RLN of each animal was crushed with a fine tip forceps and, after several survival periods (1, 2, 4, 8, 12 weeks; minimum six rats per time), the PCA and TA muscles were injected as described above. After each surgery, the motility of the vocal folds was evaluated. Additional control experiments were performed; the second control experiment (control group 2, n = 6 rats) was performed labeling the TA and PCA immediately prior to the section of the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN), in order to eliminate the possibility of accidental labeling of the cricothyroid (CT) muscle by spread from the injection site. The third control group (control group 3, n = 5 rats) was included to determine if there is some sprouting from the SLN into the territories of the RLN after a crush of this last nerve. One week after the crush injury of the RLN, the PCA and TA muscles were injected immediately before the section of the SLN. The results show that a single population of neurons represents each muscle with the PCA in the most rostral position followed caudalwards by the TA. One week post-RLN injury, both the somatotopy and the number of labeled motoneurons changed, where the labeled neurons were distributed randomly; in addition, an area of topographical overlap of the two populations was observed and vocal fold mobility was lost. In the rest of the survival periods, the overlapping area is larger, but the movement of the vocal folds tends to recover. After 12 weeks of survival, the disorganization within the Amb is the largest, but the number of motoneurons is similar to control, and all animals recovered the movement of the left vocal fold. Our additional controls indicate that no tracer spread to the CT muscle occurred, and that many of the labeled motoneurons from the PCA after 1 week post-RLN injury correspond to motoneurons whose axons travel in the SLN. Therefore, it seems that after RLN injury there is a collateral sprouting and collateral innervation. Although the somatotopic organization of the Amb is lost after a crush injury of the RLN and does not recover in the times studied here, the movement of the vocal folds as well as the number of neurons that supply the TA and the PCA muscles recovered within 8 weeks, indicating that the central nervous system of the rat has a great capacity of plasticity.
© 2013 The Authors Journal of Anatomy © 2013 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23444899      PMCID: PMC3610037          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  49 in total

Review 1.  Recent techniques for tracing pathways in the central nervous system of developing and adult mammals.

Authors:  A Vercelli; M Repici; D Garbossa; A Grimaldi
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Reinnervation of the extraocular muscles in goldfish is nonselective.

Authors:  S S Scherer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The localization of motoneurons supplying the hindlimb muscles of the mouse.

Authors:  S McHanwell; T J Biscoe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1981-08-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Arrangement of motoneurons innervating the intrinsic laryngeal muscles of cats as demonstrated by horseradish peroxidase.

Authors:  Y Yoshida; T Miyazaki; M Hirano; T Shin; T Kanaseki
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Localization of laryngeal motor neurons in the kitten.

Authors:  R R Gacek
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  The nucleus ambiguus of the rabbit.

Authors:  A M Lawn
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Effects of nerve-muscle pedicle on immobile rat vocal folds in the presence of partial innervation.

Authors:  Takashi Aoyama; Yoshihiko Kumai; Eiji Yumoto; Takaaki Ito; Satoru Miyamaru
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Brain stem projections of sensory and motor components of the vagus complex in the cat: I. The cervical vagus and nodose ganglion.

Authors:  M Kalia; M M Mesulam
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1980-09-15       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Misdirected regeneration of injured recurrent laryngeal nerve in the cat.

Authors:  I Nahm; T Shin; H Watanabe; T Maeyama
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  Observations of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and recovery using a rat model.

Authors:  Belachew Tessema; Rick M Roark; Michael J Pitman; Philip Weissbrod; Sansar Sharma; Steven D Schaefer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  8 in total

1.  GFAP immunoreactivity within the rat nucleus ambiguus after laryngeal nerve injury.

Authors:  G Berdugo-Vega; G Arias-Gil; M Rodriguez-Niedenführ; D C Davies; T Vázquez; A Pascual-Font
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Automated Quantification of Vocal Fold Motion in a Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury Mouse Model.

Authors:  Megan M Haney; Ali Hamad; Emily Leary; Filiz Bunyak; Teresa E Lever
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Laryngeal and swallow dysregulation following acute cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Teresa Pitts; Kimberly E Iceman; Alyssa Huff; M Nicholas Musselwhite; Michael L Frazure; Kellyanna C Young; Clinton L Greene; Dena R Howland
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.974

4.  Temporal expression of Laminin-111 in the developing rat larynx.

Authors:  Ian F Caplan; Ignacio Hernandez-Morato; Michael J Pitman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.197

5.  A Surgical Mouse Model for Advancing Laryngeal Nerve Regeneration Strategies.

Authors:  Alexis Mok; Jakob Allen; Megan M Haney; Ian Deninger; Brayton Ballenger; Victoria Caywood; Kate L Osman; Bradford Zitsch; Bridget L Hopewell; Aaron Thiessen; Marlena Szewczyk; Daniel Ohlhausen; Christopher I Newberry; Emily Leary; Teresa E Lever
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Maturation of the Coordination Between Respiration and Deglutition with and Without Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Lesion in an Animal Model.

Authors:  Ashley Ballester; François Gould; Laura Bond; Bethany Stricklen; Jocelyn Ohlemacher; Andrew Gross; Katherine DeLozier; Randall Buddington; Karyl Buddington; Nicole Danos; Rebecca German
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  TrkA inhibitor promotes motor functional regeneration of recurrent laryngeal nerve by suppression of sensory nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Hiroshi Suzuki; Koji Araki; Toshiyasu Matsui; Yuya Tanaka; Kosuke Uno; Masayuki Tomifuji; Taku Yamashita; Yasushi Satoh; Yasushi Kobayashi; Akihiro Shiotani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Neurotrophin expression and laryngeal muscle pathophysiology following recurrent laryngeal nerve transection.

Authors:  Baoxin Wang; Junjie Yuan; Jiafeng Xu; Jin Xie; Guoliang Wang; Pin Dong
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.952

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.