| Literature DB >> 23443302 |
Emanuela Formaggio1, Silvia F Storti, Vincenzo Tramontano, Agnese Casarin, Alessandra Bertoldo, Antonio Fiaschi, Andrea Talacchi, Francesco Sala, Gianna M Toffolo, Paolo Manganotti.
Abstract
Electrocortical stimulation remains the standard for functional brain mapping of eloquent areas to prevent postoperative functional deficits. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the short-train technique (monopolar stimulation) and Penfield's technique (bipolar stimulation) would induce different effects on brain oscillatory activity in awake patients, as quantified by electrocorticography (ECoG). The study population was seven patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. Intraoperative bipolar and monopolar electrical stimulation for cortical mapping was performed during awake surgery. ECoG was recorded using 1 × 8 electrode strip. Spectral estimation was calculated using a parametric approach based on an autoregressive model. Wavelet-based time-frequency analysis was then applied to evaluate the temporal evolution of brain oscillatory activity. Both monopolar and bipolar stimulation produced an increment in delta and a decrease in beta powers for the motor and the sensory channels. These phenomena lasted about 4 s. Comparison between monopolar and bipolar stimulation showed no significant difference in brain activity. Given the importance of quantitative signal analysis for evaluating response accuracy, ECoG recording during electrical stimulation is necessary to characterize the dynamic processes underlying changes in cortical responses in vivo. This study is a preliminary approach to the quantitative analysis of post-stimulation ECoG signals.Entities:
Keywords: AR model; ECoG; bipolar; monopolar; relative wavelet power
Year: 2013 PMID: 23443302 PMCID: PMC3580919 DOI: 10.3389/fneng.2013.00001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neuroeng ISSN: 1662-6443
Tumor type and localization.
| 1 | Left | Cortical—subcortical | Rolandic | GBM |
| 2 | Left | Cortical—subcortical | Rolandic | GBM |
| 3 | Left | Subcortical | Gyrus cinguli | GBM |
| 4 | Left | Cortical—subcortical | Rolandic | MENING |
| 5 | Left | Subcortical | Rolandic | ANG CAV |
| 6 | Left | Cortical—subcortical | Rolandic | ANG CAV |
| 7 | Left | Cortical | Insular | ASTROCYT |
GBM, glioblastoma IV °; MENING, meningioma; ANG CAV, cavernous angioma; ASTROCYT, astrocytoma II°.
Figure 1(Left) Intraoperative photograph of the brain surface showing electrode placement. M indicates the primary motor cortex, S the primary sensory cortex. (Right) Recordings of somatosensory evoked responses to contralateral median nerve stimulation (negative up) in patient no. 2. Scale: 40 μV (trace A), 30 μV (traces G, B, H, G, I); Window: 0–100 ms; Sweeps averaged: 100. Phase reversal of N and P is observed between electrodes nos. 3 and 4.
Figure 2ECoG of patient no. 4 after bipolar (A) and monopolar (B) stimulation. The vertical line represents the end of the stimulus (A), vertical lines represent the artifact induced by short-train stimulation and the last line represents the end of the stimulus (B). (C) AR power spectrum of sensory and motor channels in three conditions: baseline, after bipolar stimulation and after monopolar stimulation.
Figure 3Change in average spectral parameters after bipolar (patients nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7) and monopolar (patients nos. 4, 5, 6, 7) stimulation compared to baseline in the motor (A) and the sensory (B) channels. The left panels refer to the frequency analysis, and show the relative power in the four bands, calculated by assuming stationarity. The right panels refer to the time-frequency analysis, and show the relative wavelet power in the four bands, calculated by relaxing the stationarity assumption. Bars represent standard error (°p < 0.0125 bipolar vs. baseline).