| Literature DB >> 23443107 |
Jesús Baldenebro-López1, José Castorena-González, Norma Flores-Holguín, Jorge Almaral-Sánchez, Daniel Glossman-Mitnik.
Abstract
In this work, we studied a copper complex-based dye, which is proposed for potential photovoltaic applications and is named Cu (I) biquinoline dye. Results of electron affinities and ionization potentials have been used for the correlation between different levels of calculation used in this study, which are based on The Density Functional Theory (DFT) and time-dependent (TD) DFT. Further, the maximum absorption wavelengths of our theoretical calculations were compared with the experimental data. It was found that the M06/LANL2DZ + DZVP level of calculation provides the best approximation. This level of calculation was used to find the optimized molecular structure and to predict the main molecular vibrations, the molecular orbitals energies, dipole moment, isotropic polarizability and the chemical reactivity parameters that arise from Conceptual DFT.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23443107 PMCID: PMC3546675 DOI: 10.3390/ijms131216005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Molecular structure of copper complex.
Electron affinity and the ionization potential of Cu(I) biquinoline with different levels of theory.
| Basis set | Functional | Electron affinity (eV) | Ionization potential (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LANL2DZ + DZVP | M06 | 4.79 | 9.80 |
| M06-2X | 4.65 | 9.93 | |
| M06-HF | 4.58 | 11.86 | |
| M06-L | 4.98 | 9.55 | |
| B3LYP | 4.88 | 9.84 | |
| PBE0 | 4.79 | 9.79 | |
| LANL2DZ | M06 | 4.82 | 9.90 |
| M06-2X | 4.64 | 10.01 | |
| M06-HF | 4.57 | 9.63 | |
| M06-L | 5.00 | 9.48 | |
| 6–31G(d) + DZVP | M06 | 4.49 | 9.87 |
| M06-2X | 4.26 | 11.01 | |
| M06-HF | 4.12 | 11.61 | |
| M06-L | 4.69 | 9.49 |
Figure 2Electron affinity and ionization potential for the levels of theory used in this study and the dispersion between the values. The red line represents the mean value, in the case of electron affinity it is located at 4.75 eV and in the case of ionization potential it is equal to 9.75 eV.
Maximum absorption wavelength of Cu(I) biquinoline dye using various models.
| Model chemistry | λmax (nm) | Model chemistry | λmax (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| M06/LANL2DZ + DZVP | 556 | M06-HF/LANL2DZ | 282 |
| M06-2X/LANL2DZ + DZVP | 386 | M06/LANL2DZ | 543 |
| M06-HF/LANL2DZ + DZVP | 279 | M06-2X/LANL2DZ | 378 |
| M06-L/LANL2DZ + DZVP | 641 | M06-L/6–31G(d) + DZVP | 645 |
| B3LYP/LANL2DZ + DZVP | 614 | M06-HF/6–31G(d) + DZVP | 279 |
| PBE0/LANL2DZ + DZVP | 578 | M06/6–31G(d) + DZVP | 488 |
| M06-L/LANL2DZ | 629 | M06-2X/6–31G(d) + DZVP | 328 |
Figure 3UV-Vis spectra of Cu(I) biquinoline dye at the M06/LANL2DZ-DZVP level of calculation.
Cu(I) biquinoline electronic excited states, showing wavelengths (nm), energies (eV), oscillator strength (f) and the orbitals involved in the transitions. Only excited states with oscillator strength > 0.02 are shown.
| λ (nm) | Oscillator strength | Assignment; H = HOMO, L = LUMO, L + 1 = LUMO + 1, | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 556.0 | 2.25 | 0.1652 | H-1→L + 1(50%) H-0→L + 0(26%) H-1→L + 0(19%) |
| 373.3 | 3.32 | 0.0308 | H-3→L + 0(76%) H-2→L + 0(8%) H-4→L + 0(6%) |
| 362.0 | 3.40 | 0.0372 | H-3→L + 1(54%) H-2→L + 1(9%) H-5→L + 1(8%) |
| H-4→L + 1(7%) H-1→L + 3(5%) | |||
| 358.7 | 3.46 | 0.0225 | H-6→L + 0(43%) H-10→L + 0(16%) H-2→L + 0(13%) |
| H-9→L + 0(8%) H-5→L + 0(8%) | |||
| 355.3 | 3.49 | 0.0295 | H-5→L + 1(67%) H-5→L + 0(11%) H-3→L + 1(10%) |
| 351.6 | 3.53 | 0.0392 | H-6→L + 0(39%) H-10→L + 0(23%) H-9→L + 0(15%) |
| H-2→L + 0(9%) |
Figure 4Optimized molecular structure of Cu(I) biquinoline dye with M06/LANL2DZ + DZVP level of calculation.
Cu(I) biquinoline dye selected bond lengths (angstroms) and bond angles (degrees).
| Parameters | Value | Parameters | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu1-N2 | 2.024 | C50-O52 | 1.349 |
| Cu1-N3 | 2.023 | O52-H53 | 1.034 |
| Cu1-N4 | 2.022 | Cu1-N2-C28 | 126.0 |
| Cu1-N5 | 2.025 | Cu1-N2-C24 | 113.4 |
| N4-C45 | 1.342 | N2-Cu1-N5 | 121.4 |
| N4-C41 | 1.374 | N2-Cu1-N3 | 81.6 |
| C45-C59 | 1.477 | N2-Cu1-N4 | 128.5 |
| C41-C42 | 1.437 | N3-Cu1-N4 | 122.0 |
| C44-H58 | 1.089 | N3-Cu1-N5 | 128.2 |
| C50-O51 | 1.245 | N4-Cu1-N5 | 81.6 |
Figure 5Infrared spectra of Cu(I) biquinoline dye.
Figure 6Highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO) orbitals of Cu biquinoline dye with M06/LANL2DZ + DZVP level of calculation.
Figure 7Molecular orbital energy level diagram.
Basis sets used in this study.
| Basis set | Atoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Approach 1 | LANL2DZ | C, H, O and N |
| DZVP | Cu | |
|
| ||
| Approach | 2 LANL2DZ | C, H, O, N, and Cu |
|
| ||
| Approach 3 | 6–31G(d) | C, H, O and N |
| DZVP | Cu | |