| Literature DB >> 23443083 |
Zhenhua Hu1, Song Gao, Jian Gao, Rui Hou, Chuan Liu, Juanjuan Liu, Beibei Li, Dawo Liu, Shulan Zhang, Bei Lin.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure Lewis y and integrin α(5)β(1) expression in epithelial ovarian carcinoma and to correlate the levels of these molecules with ovarian carcinoma chemotherapy and prognosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23443083 PMCID: PMC3546651 DOI: 10.3390/ijms131215588
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(A) Immunohistochemistry Staining for integrin α5 (A1; drug-resistant group, A2; drug-sensitive group, original magnification 200×); (B) Immunohistochemistry Staining for Integrin β1 (B1; drug-resistant group, B2; drug-sensitive group, original magnification 200×); (C) Immunohistochemistry Staining for Lewis y antigen, this antigen is primarily in the cell membrane and secondarily in the cytoplasm (C1; drug-resistant group, C2; drug-sensitive group, original magnification 200×).
The expression of Lewis y and integrin α5β1 in ovarian cancer tissues.
| Group | Drug-resistant | Partial sensitive | Sensitive group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lewis y antigen | case | 34 | 6 | 52 |
| − | 3 | 3 | 20 | |
| + | 4 | 2 | 14 | |
| ++ | 19 | 1 | 18 | |
| +++ | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| 91.17 (31/34) | 50.00 (3/6) | 61.54 (32/52) | ||
| integrinα5 | − | 5 | 4 | 22 |
| + | 3 | 1 | 12 | |
| ++ | 23 | 1 | 18 | |
| +++ | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| 85.29 (29/34) | 33.33 (2/6) | 57.69 (30/2) | ||
| tegrinβ1 | − | 4 | 3 23 | |
| + | 9 | 2 | 15 | |
| ++ | 18 | 1 | 13 | |
| +++ | 3 | 0 | 1 | |
| 88.24 (30/34) | 50.00 (3/6) | 55.77 (29/52) |
Score ≥ 3(+) tumours are considered positive for Lewis y antigen and integrin α5, β1 in statistical analysis.
Univariate analyses of ovarian carcinoma chemotherapeutic drug resistance.
| Classification | Total | Drug-resistant | Sensitive group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| Case | Percentage | Case | Percentage | ||||
| Surgical stage | |||||||
| I~II stage | 32 | 4 | 12.50% | 28 | 87.50% | 5.359 | 0.002 |
| III~IV stage | 60 | 30 | 50.00% | 30 | 50.00% | ||
| Tumor grade | |||||||
| I grade | 15 | 4 | 26.67% | 11 | 73.33% | ||
| II grade | 37 | 10 | 27.03% | 27 | 72.97% | 3.033 | 0.053 |
| III grade | 40 | 20 | 50.00% | 20 | 50.00% | ||
| Histotype | |||||||
| Serous carcinoma | 58 | 24 | 41.38% | 34 | 58.62% | 0.776 | 0.544 |
| Mucinous carcinoma | 8 | 4 | 50.00% | 4 | 50.00% | ||
| Endometrioid adenocarcinoma | 4 | 1 | 25.00% | 3 | 75.00% | ||
| Clear cell carcinoma | 6 | 1 | 16.67% | 5 | 83.33% | ||
| Poorly differentiated carcinoma | 16 | 5 | 31.25% | 11 | 68.75% | ||
| metastasis of lymph node | 60 | ||||||
| yes | 13 | 8 | 61.54% | 5 | 38.46% | ||
| no | 47 | 9 | 19.15% | 38 | 80.85% | 7.599 | 0.004 |
| residual tumor size | 71 | ||||||
| ≤1 cm | 43 | 6 | 13.95% | 37 | 86.05% | ||
| 1~2 cm | 16 | 7 | 43.75% | 9 | 56.25% | 9.927 | 0.000 |
| ≥2 cm | 12 | 10 | 83.33% | 2 | 16.67% | ||
60 cases had lymph node data;
71 cases had residual tumor size data;
partially sensitive patients were grouped with sensitive patients.
Multivariate analysis of ovarian carcinoma chemotherapeutic drug resistance.
| Type | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Stage | 0.035 | 2.556 (1.067~6.123) |
| Residual tumor size | 0.004 | 1.721 (1.185~2.498) |
| Integrinα5 | 0.005 | 4.030 (1.975~8.225) |
| Lewis y | 0.016 | 2.154 (1.156~4.014) |
Multivariate analysis of prognosis in ovarian carcinoma patients.
| Type | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Metastasis of lymph node | 0.016 | 1.832 (1.119~3.000) |
| Integrin α5 | 0.019 | 1.876 (1.110~3.170) |
| Lewis y antigen | 0.037 | 1.911 (1.136~4.323) |
Figure 3Comparison of Survival Rates.