Literature DB >> 23442830

Prediction of carcinoma after resection in subjects with ampullary adenomas on endoscopic biopsy.

Ha-Na Kim1, Kwang Min Kim, Jae Uk Shin, Jong Kyun Lee, Kyu Taek Lee, Kwang Hyuk Lee, Kyoung Mee Kim, Jae Hoon Lim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/GOALS: The endoscopic treatment of ampullary adenomas is established; however, the false-negative rate of endoscopic biopsy for carcinoma is 20% to 30%, and it remains uncertain whether identifiable features predict malignancy. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the predictable factors of malignancy in ampullary adenomas on endoscopic biopsy. STUDY: Ninety-one subjects diagnosed with ampullary adenoma on endoscopic biopsy were confirmed after endoscopic or surgical resection of ampullary lesions between 1995 and 2011 respectively. Clinical, laboratory, radiologic, and endoscopic findings were compared between patients with adenoma and carcinoma after resection. We examined the predictors of malignancy in ampullary adenoma on endoscopic biopsy.
RESULTS: The malignancy rate in ampullary adenomas on endoscopic biopsy was 26.4%. Univariate analysis revealed that presence of symptoms, villous components, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), papilla enlargement on computed tomography, duct dilatation on radiologic imaging, bilirubin>2 mg/dL, aspartate aminotransferase>40 IU/L, alanine aminotransferase>40 IU/L, and alkaline phosphatase>90 U/L were associated with malignancy in patients over 65 years of age. HGD [odds ratio, 6.86 (95% confidence interval, 1.58-29.79)] and ductal dilatation [odds ratio, 11.12 (95% confidence interval, 2.27-54.37)] were independently associated with malignancy in multivariate analysis. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for ≥1 risk factors were 95.83% and 96.77%, respectively. The presence of 2 risk factors resulted in a high specificity (96%) and positive predictive value (84%) for malignancy.
CONCLUSIONS: HGD and ductal dilatation are significant predictors of malignancy in ampullary adenomas. When these risk factors are present, precautions should be taken in the consideration of malignancy in patients with ampullary adenoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23442830     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318272f2ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  6 in total

1.  [Characteristics of benign and malignant lesions of ampullary polyps and the accuracy of forceps biopsy].

Authors:  Y C Wang; Y H Huang; H Chang; W Yao; X E Yan; K Li; Y P Zhang; W Zheng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-11-11

2.  Role of endoscopy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Andrew D Hopper
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 3.  Endoscopic versus surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ernesto Quaresma Mendonça; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura; Dalton Marques Chaves; André Kondo; Leonardo Zorrón Cheng Tao Pu; Felipe Iankelevich Baracat
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?

Authors:  Vaishali Patel; Paul Jowell; Jorge Obando; Cynthia D Guy; Rebecca A Burbridge
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-12

5.  Defects of endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of periampullary carcinoma and recommendations for diagnosis and treatment: a retrospective study before and after surgery.

Authors:  Yinuo Zhang; Zhiqing Duan; Xiaoyu Yu; Yuzhu Zhang; Jing Liu; Shousheng Liao; Bo Liang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-08

6.  A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Endoscopic Resection and Surgical Resection in Ampullary Tumors.

Authors:  Jung-Soo Pyo; Byoung Kwan Son; Hyo Young Lee; Il Hwan Oh; Kwang Hyun Chung
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.