Literature DB >> 23442519

The critical spot eraser-a method to interactively control the correction of local hot and cold spots in IMRT planning.

Philipp Süss1, Michael Bortz, Karl-Heinz Küfer, Christian Thieke.   

Abstract

Common problems in inverse radiotherapy planning are localized dose insufficiencies like hot spots in organs at risk or cold spots inside targets. These are hard to correct since the optimization is based on global evaluations like maximum/minimum doses, equivalent uniform doses or dose-volume constraints for whole structures. In this work, we present a new approach to locally correct the dose of any given treatment plan. Once a treatment plan has been found that is acceptable in general but requires local corrections, these areas are marked by the planner. Then the system generates new plans that fulfil the local dose goals. Consequently, it is possible to interactively explore all plans between the locally corrected plans and the original treatment plan, allowing one to exactly adjust the degree of local correction and how the plan changes overall. Both the amount (in Gy) and the size of the local dose change can be navigated. The method is introduced formally as a new mathematical optimization setting, and is evaluated using a clinical example of a meningioma at the base of the skull. It was possible to eliminate a hot spot outside the target volume while controlling the dose changes to all other parts of the treatment plan. The proposed method has the potential to become the final standard step of inverse treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23442519     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/6/1855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Improving target dose coverage and organ-at-risk sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of advanced laryngeal cancer by a simple optimization technique.

Authors:  J-Y Lu; L-L Wu; J-Y Zhang; J Zheng; M L-M Cheung; C-C Ma; L-X Xie; B-T Huang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dosimetric Evaluation of a Simple Planning Technique for Improving Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Mei Li; Bao-Tian Huang; Wen-Jia Xie; Liang-Xi Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Improving target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical oesophageal cancer using a simple optimisation method.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Bao-Tian Huang; Li-Li Wu; Wen-Jia Xie; Zhi-Jian Chen; De-Rui Li; Liang-Xi Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A simple optimization approach for improving target dose homogeneity in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for sinonasal cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Ji-Yong Zhang; Mei Li; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Yang-Kang Li; Jing Zheng; Bao-Tian Huang; Wu-Zhe Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Dosimetric evaluation of a simple planning method for improving intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage III lung cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Zhu Lin; Jing Zheng; Pei-Xian Lin; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Bao-Tian Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Interactive dose shaping part 2: proof of concept study for six prostate patients.

Authors:  Cornelis Ph Kamerling; Peter Ziegenhein; Florian Sterzing; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Interactive dose shaping part 1: a new paradigm for IMRT treatment planning.

Authors:  Peter Ziegenhein; Cornelis Ph Kamerling; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.