Literature DB >> 23442081

Bioequivalence of inhaled drugs: fundamentals, challenges and perspectives.

Gabriela Apiou-Sbirlea1, Steve Newman, John Fleming, Ruediger Siekmeier, Stephan Ehrmann, Gerhard Scheuch, Guenther Hochhaus, Anthony Hickey.   

Abstract

Interest in bioequivalence (BE) of inhaled drugs derives largely from the desire to offer generic substitutes to successful drug products. The complexity of aerosol dosage forms renders them difficult to mimic and raises questions regarding definitions of similarities and those properties that must be controlled to guarantee both the quality and the efficacy of the product. Despite a high level of enthusiasm to identify and control desirable properties there is no clear guidance, regulatory or scientific, for the variety of aerosol dosage forms, on practical measures of BE from which products can be developed. As more data on the pharmaceutical and clinical relevance of various techniques, as described in this review, become available, it is likely that a path to the demonstration of BE will become evident. In the meantime, debate on this topic will continue.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23442081     DOI: 10.4155/tde.12.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Deliv        ISSN: 2041-5990


  4 in total

1.  A Systematic Analysis of the Sensitivity of Plasma Pharmacokinetics to Detect Differences in the Pulmonary Performance of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate Products Using a Model-Based Simulation Approach.

Authors:  Benjamin Weber; Guenther Hochhaus
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  A new hypothesis to investigate bioequivalence of pharmaceutical inhalation products.

Authors:  Maryam Khoubnasabjafari; Elaheh Rahimpour; Morteza Samini; Vahid Jouyban-Gharamaleki; Lan Chen; Donghao Chen; Hak-Kim Chan; Abolghasem Jouyban
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  In Vivo-Relevant Transwell Dish-Based Dissolution Testing for Orally Inhaled Corticosteroid Products.

Authors:  Masahiro Sakagami; Hua Li; Jügen Venitz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Inhaled antibodies: Quality and performance considerations.

Authors:  Anthony James Hickey; Ian Edward Stewart
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.526

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.