Literature DB >> 23442017

Contour analysis of an implant--soft tissue interface.

W L Chai1, K Moharamzadeh, R van Noort, L Emanuelsson, A Palmquist, I M Brook.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Studies of peri-implant soft tissue on in vivo models are commonly based on histological sections prepared using undecalcified or 'fracture' techniques. These techniques require the cutting or removal of implant during the specimen preparation process. The aim of this study is to explore a new impression technique that does not require any cutting or removal of implant for contour analysis of soft tissue around four types of titanium (Ti) surface roughness using an in vitro three-dimensional oral mucosal model (3D OMM).
METHODS: The 3D OMM was constructed by co-culturing a keratinocyte cell line TR146 and human oral fibroblasts on to an acellular dermis scaffold. On the fourth day, a Ti disk was placed into the model. Four types of Ti surface topographies, i.e. polished, machined, sandblasted and anodized were tested. After 10 d of culture, the specimens were processed based on undecalcified (ground sectioning), electropolishing and impression techniques for contour analysis of the implant-soft tissue interface.
RESULTS: Under light microscopic examination of the ground and electropolishing sections, it was found that the cell line-based oral mucosa formed a peri-implant-like epithelium attachment on to all four types of Ti surfaces. In contour analysis, the most common contour observed between the cell line-based oral mucosa and Ti surface was at an angle ranging between 45° and 90°.
CONCLUSION: The in vitro cell line-based 3D OMM formed a peri-implant-like epithelium at the implant-soft tissue interface. The contour of the implant-soft tissue interface for the four types of Ti surface was not significantly different.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental implant; epithelium; fibroblast; in vitro model; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23442017     DOI: 10.1111/jre.12062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontal Res        ISSN: 0022-3484            Impact factor:   4.419


  3 in total

1.  Commensal and pathogenic biofilms differently modulate peri-implant oral mucosa in an organotypic model.

Authors:  Alexandra Ingendoh-Tsakmakidis; Carina Mikolai; Andreas Winkel; Szymon P Szafrański; Christine S Falk; Angela Rossi; Heike Walles; Meike Stiesch
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.715

2.  An In-Vitro Analysis of Peri-Implant Mucosal Seal Following Photofunctionalization of Zirconia Abutment Materials.

Authors:  Masfueh Razali; Wei Cheong Ngeow; Ros Anita Omar; Wen Lin Chai
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-01-15

3.  Time resolved 3D live-cell imaging on implants.

Authors:  Alexandra Ingendoh-Tsakmakidis; Lena Nolte; Andreas Winkel; Heiko Meyer; Anastasia Koroleva; Anastasia Shpichka; Tammo Ripken; Alexander Heisterkamp; Meike Stiesch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.