Literature DB >> 23441879

The role of cell cycle in the efficiency and activity of cancer nanomedicines.

Abraham H Abouzeid1, Vladimir P Torchilin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With a wealth of knowledge on the effect of nanoparticle properties, including size, shape, charge and composition, on intracellular delivery, little has been reported on the effect of the cell cycle on the intracellular delivery and activity of nanomedicines including non-viral gene delivery systems. The aim of this review is to shed a light on this topic. AREAS COVERED: It is now evident that nanoparticle cell uptake varies with the cell cycle phase. This review addresses this variation by dissecting the effect of cell population heterogeneity on the intracellular delivery and activity of nanomedicines with a special focus on non-viral gene delivery and combination therapy modalities that utilize cell cycle inhibitors as co-targets for therapy. In addition, the importance of three-dimensional (3D) culture systems in the drug delivery field within the context of the cell cycle will be addressed. EXPERT OPINION: The understanding of the cell cycle machinery has improved dramatically over the last few decades. Developing combination therapy modalities that target the cell cycle to achieve better cancer patient outcome should now be the focus. Furthermore, more effort should be placed on developing a reliable, consistent, high throughput 3D cell culture system since these systems more closely resemble the cell cycle status of in vivo tumors. A switch from 2D to 3D culture systems, to more accurately predict the in vivo efficacy of nanoparticle drug delivery systems, is desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23441879     DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2013.776538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv        ISSN: 1742-5247            Impact factor:   6.648


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of expansile nanoparticle tumor localization and efficacy in a cancer stem cell-derived model of pancreatic peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Victoria Lm Herrera; Aaron H Colby; Glaiza Al Tan; Ann M Moran; Michael J O'Brien; Yolonda L Colson; Nelson Ruiz-Opazo; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.307

2.  Therapeutic efficacy of combining pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and radiofrequency (RF) ablation: comparison between slow-drug-releasing, non-thermosensitive and fast-drug-releasing, thermosensitive nano-liposomes.

Authors:  Alexander V Andriyanov; Erez Koren; Yechezkel Barenholz; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mitochondria chaperone GRP75 moonlighting as a cell cycle controller to derail endocytosis provides an opportunity for nanomicrosphere intracellular delivery.

Authors:  Zhihui Gao; Xiuran Niu; Qing Zhang; Hang Chen; Aiai Gao; Shanshan Qi; Rong Xiang; Mattias Belting; Sihe Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-19

4.  Knockdown of DPP4 promotes the proliferation and the activation of the CREB/aromatase pathway in ovarian granulosa cells.

Authors:  Lina Lin; Liman Wang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  GRP75-driven, cell-cycle-dependent macropinocytosis of Tat/pDNA-Ca2+ nanoparticles underlies distinct gene therapy effect in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Linjia Su; Zhe Sun; Fangzheng Qi; Huishan Su; Luomeng Qian; Jing Li; Liang Zuo; Jinhai Huang; Zhilin Yu; Jinping Li; Zhinan Chen; Sihe Zhang
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 9.429

6.  Two-Step Delivery: Exploiting the Partition Coefficient Concept to Increase Intratumoral Paclitaxel Concentrations In vivo Using Responsive Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Aaron H Colby; Rong Liu; Morgan D Schulz; Robert F Padera; Yolonda L Colson; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.