Literature DB >> 23440813

Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery.

Vincenzo Berghella1, Jason K Baxter, Nancy W Hendrix.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurement of cervical length (CL) by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) is predictive of preterm birth (PTB). It is unclear if this screening test is effective for prevention of PTB.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of antenatal management based on transvaginal ultrasound of cervical length (TVU CL) screening for preventing PTB. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2012), reviewed the reference lists of all articles and contacted experts in the field for additional and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published and unpublished randomized controlled trials including pregnant women between the gestational ages of 14 to 32 weeks screened with TVU CL for risk of PTB. This review focuses exclusively on studies based on knowledge versus no knowledge of TVU CL results. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All potential studies identified from the search were independently assessed for inclusion by three review authors. We also analyzed studies for quality measures and extracted data. MAIN
RESULTS: Of the 13 trials identified, five were eligible for inclusion (n = 507). Three included singleton gestations with preterm labor (PTL); one included singleton gestations with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM); and one included twin gestations with or without PTL.In the three trials of singleton gestations with PTL, 290 women were randomized; 147 to knowledge and 143 to no knowledge of TVU CL. Knowledge of TVU CL results was associated with a non-significant decrease in PTB at less than 37 weeks (22.3% versus 34.7%, respectively; average risk ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 1.32; two trials, 242 women) and at less than 34 weeks (6.9% verus 12.6%; RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.20; three trials, 256 women). Delivery occurred at a later gestational age in the knowledge versus no knowledge groups (mean difference (MD) 0.64 weeks, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.25; three trials, 290 women). For all other outcomes for which there were available data (PTB at less than 34 or 28 weeks; birthweight less than 2500 grams; perinatal death; maternal hospitalization; tocolysis; and steroids for fetal lung maturity), there was no evidence of a difference between groups.The trial of singleton gestations with PPROM (n = 92) evaluated as its primary outcome safety of TVU CL in this population, and not its effect on management. There was no evidence of a difference in incidence of maternal and neonatal infections between the TVU CL and no TVU CL groups.In the trial of twin gestations with or without PTL (n = 125), there was no evidence of a difference in PTB at less than 36, 34, or 30 weeks, gestational age at delivery, and other perinatal and maternal outcomes between the TVU CL and the no TVU CL groups. Life-table analysis revealed significantly less PTB at less than 35 weeks in the TVU CL group compared with the no TVU CL group (P = 0.02). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening of asymptomatic or symptomatic pregnant women with TVU CL. Since there is a non-significant association between knowledge of TVU CL results and a lower incidence of PTB at less than 37 weeks in symptomatic women, we encourage further research. Future studies should look at specific populations separately (e.g., singleton versus twins; symptoms of PTL or no such symptoms), report on all pertinent maternal and perinatal outcomes, and include cost-effectiveness analyses. Most importantly, future studies should include a clear protocol for management of women based on TVU CL results, so that it can be easily evaluated and replicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23440813      PMCID: PMC6464944          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007235.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  20 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound assessment of the cervix.

Authors:  Vincenzo Berghella; George Bega; Jorge E Tolosa; Michele Berghella
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.

Authors:  Roger M Harbord; Matthias Egger; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low-risk population?

Authors:  Ratko Matijevic; Ozren Grgic; Oliver Vasilj
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  A randomized controlled trial of cervical scanning vs history to determine cerclage in women at high risk of preterm birth (CIRCLE trial).

Authors:  Rachael Simcox; Paul T Seed; Phillip Bennett; T G Teoh; Lucilla Poston; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Transperineal versus endovaginal ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in the midtrimester: a blinded comparison.

Authors:  J Owen; C Neely; A Northen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Cervical length and prediction of preterm delivery.

Authors:  Jacqueline Grimes-Dennis; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.927

7.  The value of transvaginal ultrasonography in diagnosis and management of cervical incompetence.

Authors:  D Kassanos; E Salamalekis; N Vitoratos; N Panayotopoulos; C Loghis; C Creatsas
Journal:  Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.146

8.  Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth.

Authors:  Vincenzo Berghella; Amanda Roman; Constantine Daskalakis; Amen Ness; Jason K Baxter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Does knowledge of cervical length and fetal fibronectin affect management of women with threatened preterm labor? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Amen Ness; John Visintine; Emily Ricci; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Targeted therapy for threatened preterm labor based on sonographic measurement of the cervical length: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Z Alfirevic; H Allen-Coward; F Molina; C P Vinuesa; K Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.299

View more
  24 in total

1.  Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/025, February 2019) - Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Etiology, Prediction, Primary and Secondary Prevention of Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Richard Berger; Harald Abele; Franz Bahlmann; Ivonne Bedei; Klaus Doubek; Ursula Felderhoff-Müser; Herbert Fluhr; Yves Garnier; Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin; Hanns Helmer; Egbert Herting; Markus Hoopmann; Irene Hösli; Udo Hoyme; Alexandra Jendreizeck; Harald Krentel; Ruben Kuon; Wolf Lütje; Silke Mader; Holger Maul; Werner Mendling; Barbara Mitschdörfer; Tatjana Nicin; Monika Nothacker; Dirk Olbertz; Werner Rath; Claudia Roll; Dietmar Schlembach; Ekkehard Schleußner; Florian Schütz; Vanadin Seifert-Klauss; Susanne Steppat; Daniel Surbek
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  Preterm birth prevention: how well are we really doing? A review of the latest literature.

Authors:  Sarit Avraham; Fouad Azem; Daniel Seidman
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-06-07

3.  Quantitative elastography of the uterine cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery.

Authors:  K Köbbing; A Fruscalzo; K Hammer; M Möllers; M Falkenberg; R Kwiecien; W Klockenbusch; R Schmitz
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Cervical Sonoelastography and Cervical Length Measurement but not Cervicovaginal Interleukin-6 Are Predictors for Preterm Birth.

Authors:  A Weichert; D von Schöning; T Fischer; A Thomas
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2016-08-24

5.  Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes.

Authors:  Lorene A Temming; Jennifer K Durst; Methodius G Tuuli; Molly J Stout; Jeffrey M Dicke; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour.

Authors:  Christine Urquhart; Rosemary Currell; Francoise Harlow; Liz Callow
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-15

Review 7.  p38 Mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK): a new therapeutic target for reducing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Ramkumar Menon; John Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 8.  Precocious cervical ripening as a screening target to predict spontaneous preterm delivery among asymptomatic singleton pregnancies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qing Li; Mathew Reeves; John Owen; Louis G Keith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Association Between Features of Spontaneous Late Preterm Labor and Late Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Angelica V Glover; Ashley N Battarbee; Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman; Kim A Boggess; Grecio Sandoval; Sean C Blackwell; Alan T N Tita; Uma M Reddy; Lucky Jain; George R Saade; Dwight J Rouse; Jay D Iams; Erin A S Clark; Edward K Chien; Alan M Peaceman; Ronald S Gibbs; Geeta K Swamy; Mary E Norton; Brian M Casey; Steve N Caritis; Jorge E Tolosa; Yoram Sorokin; Tracy A Manuck
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Prediction of Delivery in Women with Threatening Preterm Labour using Phosphorylated Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 and Cervical Length using Transvaginal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Amrita Kumari; Vandana Saini; P K Jain; Mamta Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.