Literature DB >> 23440663

Multiple myeloma: 2013 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.

S Vincent Rajkumar1.   

Abstract

DISEASE OVERVIEW: Multiple myeloma accounts for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies. DIAGNOSIS: The diagnosis requires 10% or more clonal plasma cells on bone marrow examination or a biopsy proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of associated end-organ damage. In addition, the presence of 60% or more clonal plasma cells in the marrow is also considered as myeloma regardless of the presence or absence of end-organ damage. RISK STRATIFICATION: In the absence of concurrent trisomies, patients with 17p deletion, t(14;16), and t(14;20) are considered to have high-risk myeloma. Patients with t(4;14) translocation are considered intermediate-risk. All others are considered as standard-risk. RISK-ADAPTED INITIAL THERAPY: Standard-risk patients can be treated with lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd), or a bortezomib-containing triplet such as bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone (VCD). Intermediate-risk and high-risk patients require a bortezomib-based triplet regimen. In eligible patients, initial therapy is given for approximately 4 months followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Standard-risk patients can opt for delayed ASCT if stem cells can be cryopreserved. In patients are not candidates for transplant, initial therapy is given for approximately 12-18 months. MAINTENANCE THERAPY: After initial therapy, lenalidomide maintenance is considered for standard-risk patients who are not in very good partial response or better, while maintenance with a bortezomib-based regimen should be considered in pateints with intermediate or high-risk myeloma. MANAGEMENT OF REFRACTORY DISEASE: Patients with indolent relapse can be treated first with two-drug or three-drug combinations. Patients with more aggressive relapse often require therapy with a combination of multiple active agents.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23440663     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  43 in total

1.  Responsiveness of cytogenetically discrete human myeloma cell lines to lenalidomide: lack of correlation with cereblon and interferon regulatory factor 4 expression levels.

Authors:  Alexandra J Greenberg; Denise K Walters; Shaji K Kumar; S Vincent Rajkumar; Diane F Jelinek
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 2.  First line vs delayed transplantation in myeloma: Certainties and controversies.

Authors:  Annamaria Brioli
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

3.  Lenalidomide maintenance for high-risk multiple myeloma after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Melissa Alsina; Pamela S Becker; Xiaobo Zhong; Alexia Adams; Parameswaran Hari; Scott Rowley; Edward A Stadtmauer; David H Vesole; Brent Logan; Daniel Weisdorf; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Leslie L Popplewell; Brian McClune; William Bensinger; Marcie Riches; Sergio A Giralt; Marcelo C Pasquini
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  MicroC(3): an ex vivo microfluidic cis-coculture assay to test chemosensitivity and resistance of patient multiple myeloma cells.

Authors:  Chorom Pak; Natalie S Callander; Edmond W K Young; Benjamin Titz; KyungMann Kim; Sandeep Saha; Kenny Chng; Fotis Asimakopoulos; David J Beebe; Shigeki Miyamoto
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Chromosome 8q24.1/c-MYC abnormality: a marker for high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  Isabella C Glitza; Gary Lu; Rupin Shah; Qaiser Bashir; Nina Shah; Richard E Champlin; Jatin Shah; Robert Z Orlowski; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2014-08-18

6.  Predicting multiple myeloma disease activity by analyzing natural calcium isotopic composition.

Authors:  G W Gordon; J Monge; M B Channon; Q Wu; J L Skulan; A D Anbar; R Fonseca
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Flow Cytometric Evaluation of Traditional and Novel Surface Markers for the Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias.

Authors:  Dominik F Draxler; Lisa M Wutzlhofer; Georg Slavka; Wolfgang Hübl; Heinz Ludwig; Martin Schreder; John Reynolds; Martin Willheim
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Targeting PYK2 mediates microenvironment-specific cell death in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M B Meads; B Fang; L Mathews; J Gemmer; L Nong; I Rosado-Lopez; T Nguyen; J E Ring; W Matsui; A R MacLeod; J A Pachter; L A Hazlehurst; J M Koomen; K H Shain
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Prognostic significance of increased bone marrow microcirculation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of a prospective DCE-MRI study.

Authors:  Maximilian Merz; Thomas M Moehler; Judith Ritsch; Tobias Bäuerle; Christian M Zechmann; Barbara Wagner; Anna Jauch; Dirk Hose; Christina Kunz; Thomas Hielscher; Hendrik Laue; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Stefan Delorme; Jens Hillengass
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Small-lymphoid cells and myeloid antigen expression in a patient with IgG myeloma: A case report.

Authors:  Pengjun Jiang; Wen Xia; Xuemei Sun; Xingbin Dai; Lin Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.