Literature DB >> 23440504

Life form and water source interact to determine active time and environment in cryptogams: an example from the maritime Antarctic.

Mark Schlensog1, T G Allan Green, Burkhard Schroeter.   

Abstract

Antarctica, with its almost pristine conditions and relatively simple vegetation, offers excellent opportunities to investigate the influence of environmental factors on species performance, such information being crucial if the effects of possible climate change are to be understood. Antarctic vegetation is mainly cryptogamic. Cryptogams are poikilohydric and are only metabolically and photosynthetically active when hydrated. Activity patterns of the main life forms present, bryophytes (10 species, ecto- and endohydric), lichens (5 species) and phanerogams (2 species), were monitored for 21 days using chlorophyll a fluorescence as an indicator of metabolic activity and, therefore, of water regime at a mesic (hydration by meltwater) and a xeric (hydration by precipitation) site on Léonie Island/West Antarctic Peninsula (67°36'S). Length of activity depended mainly on site and form of hydration. Plants at the mesic site that were hydrated by meltwater were active for long periods, up to 100 % of the measurement period, whilst activity was much shorter at the xeric site where hydration was entirely by precipitation. There were also differences due to life form, with phanerogams and mesic bryophytes being most active and lichens generally much less so. The length of the active period for lichens was longer than in continental Antarctica but shorter than in the more northern Antarctic Peninsula. Light intensity when hydrated was positively related to the length of the active period. High activity species were strongly coupled to the incident light whilst low activity species were active under lower light levels and essentially uncoupled from incident light. Temperatures were little different between sites and also almost identical to temperatures, when active, for lichens in continental and peninsular Antarctica. Gradients in vegetation cover and growth rates across Antarctica are, therefore, not likely to be due to differences in temperature but more likely to the length of the hydrated (active) period. The strong effect on activity of the mode of hydration and the life form, plus the uncoupling from incident light for less active species, all make modelling of vegetation change with climate a more difficult exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23440504     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2608-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  Ecophysiology of photosynthesis in bryophytes: major roles for oxygen photoreduction and non-photochemical quenching?

Authors:  Michael C F Proctor; Nicholas Smirnoff
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.500

2.  Photosynthetic and respiratory acclimation and growth response of Antarctic vascular plants to contrasting temperature regimes.

Authors:  F S Xiong; E C Mueller; T A Day
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.844

3.  Chlorophyll a fluorescence and CO2 exchange of Umbilicaria aprina under extreme light stress in the cold.

Authors:  L Kappen; B Schroeter; T G A Green; R D Seppelt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Effects of Re-vegetation on Herbaceous Species Composition and Biological Soil Crusts Development in a Coal Mine Dumping Site.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Peng Zhang; Yigang Hu; Lei Huang
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Relationships between water status and photosystem functionality in a chlorolichen and its isolated photobiont.

Authors:  Francesco Petruzzellis; Tadeja Savi; Stefano Bertuzzi; Alice Montagner; Mauro Tretiach; Andrea Nardini
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Biocrust morphogroups provide an effective and rapid assessment tool for drylands.

Authors:  Cassia F Read; David H Duncan; Peter A Vesk; Jane Elith; Shiqiang Wan
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 6.528

4.  Moss survival through in situ cryptobiosis after six centuries of glacier burial.

Authors:  N Cannone; T Corinti; F Malfasi; P Gerola; A Vianelli; I Vanetti; S Zaccara; P Convey; M Guglielmin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  PnLRR-RLK27, a novel leucine-rich repeats receptor-like protein kinase from the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans, positively regulates salinity and oxidation-stress tolerance.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Shenghao Liu; Chengcheng Li; Tailin Wang; Pengying Zhang; Kaoshan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Environmental factors influencing fine-scale distribution of Antarctica's only endemic insect.

Authors:  Leslie J Potts; J D Gantz; Yuta Kawarasaki; Benjamin N Philip; David J Gonthier; Audrey D Law; Luke Moe; Jason M Unrine; Rebecca L McCulley; Richard E Lee; David L Denlinger; Nicholas M Teets
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Identity of plant, lichen and moss species connects with microbial abundance and soil functioning in Maritime Antarctica.

Authors:  Alberto Benavent-González; Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Laura Fernández-Brun; Brajesh K Singh; Fernando T Maestre; Leopoldo G Sancho
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.192

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.