Literature DB >> 23439753

Histomolecular phenotypes and outcome in adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of vater.

David K Chang1, Nigel B Jamieson, Amber L Johns, Christopher J Scarlett, Marina Pajic, Angela Chou, Mark Pinese, Jeremy L Humphris, Marc D Jones, Christopher Toon, Adnan M Nagrial, Lorraine A Chantrill, Venessa T Chin, Andreia V Pinho, Ilse Rooman, Mark J Cowley, Jianmin Wu, R Scott Mead, Emily K Colvin, Jaswinder S Samra, Vincenzo Corbo, Claudio Bassi, Massimo Falconi, Rita T Lawlor, Stefano Crippa, Nicola Sperandio, Samantha Bersani, Euan J Dickson, Mohamed A A Mohamed, Karin A Oien, Alan K Foulis, Elizabeth A Musgrove, Robert L Sutherland, James G Kench, C Ross Carter, Anthony J Gill, Aldo Scarpa, Colin J McKay, Andrew V Biankin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Individuals with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater demonstrate a broad range of outcomes, presumably because these cancers may arise from any one of the three epithelia that converge at that location. This variability poses challenges for clinical decision making and the development of novel therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the potential clinical utility of histomolecular phenotypes defined using a combination of histopathology and protein expression (CDX2 and MUC1) in 208 patients from three independent cohorts who underwent surgical resection for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater.
RESULTS: Histologic subtype and CDX2 and MUC1 expression were significant prognostic variables. Patients with a histomolecular pancreaticobiliary phenotype (CDX2 negative, MUC1 positive) segregated into a poor prognostic group in the training (hazard ratio [HR], 3.34; 95% CI, 1.69 to 6.62; P < .001) and both validation cohorts (HR, 5.65; 95% CI, 2.77 to 11.5; P < .001 and HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.25 to 7.17; P = .0119) compared with histomolecular nonpancreaticobiliary carcinomas. Further stratification by lymph node (LN) status defined three clinically relevant subgroups: one, patients with histomolecular nonpancreaticobiliary (intestinal) carcinoma without LN metastases who had an excellent prognosis; two, those with histomolecular pancreaticobiliary carcinoma with LN metastases who had a poor outcome; and three, the remainder of patients (nonpancreaticobiliary, LN positive or pancreaticobiliary, LN negative) who had an intermediate outcome.
CONCLUSION: Histopathologic and molecular criteria combine to define clinically relevant histomolecular phenotypes of adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater and potentially represent distinct diseases with significant implications for current therapeutic strategies, the ability to interpret past clinical trials, and future trial design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23439753     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.8868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  48 in total

1.  Immunohistochemical Predictors for Intestinal and Pancreatobiliary Types of Adenocarcinoma of The Ampulla of Vater.

Authors:  João Paulo Lemos da Silveira Santos; Carla Jorge Machado; Eduardo Paulino Junior; João Bernardo Sancio Rocha Rodrigues; Paula Teixeira Vidigal; Vivian Resende
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Genomic and proteomic characterization of ARID1A chromatin remodeller in ampullary tumors.

Authors:  Anca Nastase; Jin Yao Teo; Hong Lee Heng; Cedric Chuan Young Ng; Swe Swe Myint; Vikneswari Rajasegaran; Jia Liang Loh; Ser Yee Lee; London Lucien Ooi; Alexander Yaw Fui Chung; Pierce Kah Hoe Chow; Peng Chung Cheow; Wei Keat Wan; Rafy Azhar; Avery Khoo; Sam Xin Xiu; Syed Muhammad Fahmy Alkaff; Ioana Cutcutache; Jing Quan Lim; Choon Kiat Ong; Vlad Herlea; Simona Dima; Dan G Duda; Bin Tean Teh; Irinel Popescu; Tony Kiat Hon Lim
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Ampullary cancer: Evaluation of somatic and germline genetic alterations and association with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Winston Wong; Maeve A Lowery; Michael F Berger; Yelena Kemel; Barry Taylor; Ahmet Zehir; Preethi Srinivasan; Chaitanya Bandlamudi; Joanne Chou; Marinela Capanu; Anna Varghese; Kenneth H Yu; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Jinru Shia; David S Klimstra; William R Jarnagin; Zsofia K Stadler; Eileen M O'Reilly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Ampullary cancer: an overview.

Authors:  Daniel H Ahn; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2014

5.  Metastatic Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater with an Unusually Prolonged Survival.

Authors:  Chandana Javvaji; Jacob R Bledsoe; Lloyd Hutchinson; Ediz F Cosar; Lacey J McIntosh; Venu G Bathini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03

6.  Clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotypic characteristics of ampullary carcinomas with an emphasis on SMAD4 expression.

Authors:  Ahmad Alkhasawneh; Lizette Vila Duckworth; Thomas J George; Neelam V Desai; Alex J Sommerfeld; Xiaomin Lu; Tania Zuluaga Toro
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-12

7.  Ampullary carcinoma is often of mixed or hybrid histologic type: an analysis of reproducibility and clinical relevance of classification as pancreatobiliary versus intestinal in 232 cases.

Authors:  Michelle D Reid; Serdar Balci; Nobuyuki Ohike; Yue Xue; Grace E Kim; Takuma Tajiri; Bahar Memis; Ipek Coban; Anil Dolgun; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Olca Basturk; David A Kooby; Juan M Sarmiento; Shishir K Maithel; Bassel F El-Rayes; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dailin Rong; Yize Mao; Wanming Hu; Shuhang Xu; Jun Wang; Haoqiang He; Shengping Li; Rong Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Role of Adjuvant Multimodality Therapy After Curative-Intent Resection of Ampullary Carcinoma.

Authors:  Brett L Ecker; Charles M Vollmer; Stephen W Behrman; Valentina Allegrini; John Aversa; Chad G Ball; Courtney E Barrows; Adam C Berger; Martha N Cagigas; John D Christein; Elijah Dixon; William E Fisher; Mollie Freedman-Weiss; Francisco Guzman-Pruneda; Robert H Hollis; Michael G House; Tara S Kent; Stacy J Kowalsky; Giuseppe Malleo; Ronald R Salem; Roberto Salvia; Carl R Schmidt; Thomas F Seykora; Richard Zheng; Amer H Zureikat; Paxton V Dickson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  MUC2 expression is an adverse prognostic factor in superficial gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Jon M Davison; Shane T Ellis; Tyler J Foxwell; James D Luketich; Michael K Gibson; Shih-Fan Kuan; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.