Literature DB >> 23439324

More research, more responsibility: the expansion of duty to warn in cancer patients considering fertility preservation.

Gwendolyn P Quinn1, Susan T Vadaparampil.   

Abstract

Reproductive technology is advancing at a steadfast pace. Researchers are successfully refining options for fertility preservation, to the benefit of the cancer community. Research has consistently shown cancer patients and survivors desire to have risks to fertility and preservation options disclosed, and major campaigns have been undertaken to refer these patients to fertility specialists. However, the decision to pursue fertility preservation is not an isolated judgment. A variety of future decisions may arise for the individual or couple, choices that may not have been relayed during the initial decision-making process. Future decisions include the length of time to continue to store frozen gametes, donating banked gametes to infertile couples, and whether embryos created with one partner would be accepted by a new partner. It is important to continue the advancement of fertility preservation not only in the scientific milieu, but also in addressing a patient's preparedness for long-term decision making.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; fertility; health care; oncology; professional responsibilities; reproductive health

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23439324     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Oncofertility: a grand collaboration between reproductive medicine and oncology.

Authors:  Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Healthcare professionals' views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Cecilia Vindrola-Padros; Karen E Dyer; John Cyrus; Irene Machowa Lubker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 3.  Childbearing attitudes and decisions of young breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vânia Gonçalves; Ivana Sehovic; Gwendolyn Quinn
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Need for information, honesty and respect: patient perspectives on health care professionals communication about cancer and fertility.

Authors:  Jane M Ussher; Chloe Parton; Janette Perz
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  The role of Indian gynecologists in oncofertility care and counselling.

Authors:  Nalini Mahajan; Madhuri Patil; Surleen Kaur; Simrandeep Kaur; Padmaja Naidu
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

6.  An evaluation of oncofertility decision support resources among breast cancer patients and health care providers.

Authors:  Brittany Speller; Amanda Sissons; Corinne Daly; Marcia Facey; Erin Kennedy; Kelly Metcalfe; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Protocol for the development and acceptability of a fertility-related decision aid for young women with breast cancer in Portugal.

Authors:  Vânia Gonçalves; Luzia Travado; Pedro Lopes Ferreira; Gwendolyn Quinn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients: In Vivo and In Vitro Options.

Authors:  Rouhollah Fathi; Mojtaba Rezazadeh Valojerdi; Bita Ebrahimi; Farideh Eivazkhani; Mahzad Akbarpour; Leila Sadat Tahaei; Naeimeh Sadat Abtahi
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 9.  Integration of partners of young women with cancer in oncofertility evidence-based informational resources.

Authors:  Vânia Gonçalves; Pedro L Ferreira; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.