Literature DB >> 23439163

Minding the gaps in continuous glucose monitoring: a method to repair gaps to achieve more accurate glucometrics.

Stephanie J Fonda1, Drew G Lewis, Robert A Vigersky.   

Abstract

Estimation of glycemic variability requires frequent measures of glucose and is greatly aided by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); however, under real-world conditions, missing data or "gaps" of ≥ 10 minutes can occur in CGM data, affecting the reliability of certain estimates. Thus, we determined the magnitude of the gap problem as observed in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes and demonstrated an approach to fill the gaps. The approach takes the difference between readings before and after a gap and distributes the difference equally across the number of missing readings, as determined by the sensor's setting for reading frequency. The approach is easy to implement, conservative, and improves estimation of variability measures that reference time, namely, mean of daily differences and continuous overlapping net glycemic action.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23439163      PMCID: PMC3692219          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  15 in total

1.  Tests of glycemia in diabetes.

Authors:  David E Goldstein; Randie R Little; Rodney A Lorenz; John I Malone; David M Nathan; Charles M Peterson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Characterizing blood glucose variability using new metrics with continuous glucose monitoring data.

Authors:  Cynthia R Marling; Jay H Shubrook; Stanley J Vernier; Matthew T Wiley; Frank L Schwartz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

4.  New approaches to display of self-monitoring of blood glucose data.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

5.  Evaluating rate of change as an index of glycemic variability, using continuous glucose monitoring data.

Authors:  Benjamin C Whitelaw; Pratik Choudhary; David Hopkins
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Glycemic variability: the third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it?

Authors:  Louis Monnier; Claude Colette; David R Owens
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

7.  The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nicole M Ehrhardt; Mary Chellappa; M Susan Walker; Stephanie J Fonda; Robert A Vigersky
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

8.  The minimum frequency of glucose measurements from which glycemic variation can be consistently assessed.

Authors:  Peter A Baghurst; David Rodbard; Fergus J Cameron
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

9.  Normal reference range for mean tissue glucose and glycemic variability derived from continuous glucose monitoring for subjects without diabetes in different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Nathan R Hill; Nick S Oliver; Pratik Choudhary; Jonathan C Levy; Peter Hindmarsh; David R Matthews
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Robert A Vigersky; Stephanie J Fonda; Mary Chellappa; M Susan Walker; Nicole M Ehrhardt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  8 in total

1.  Improved Time in Range and Glycemic Variability With Sotagliflozin in Combination With Insulin in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis of 24-Week Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data From the inTandem Program.

Authors:  Thomas Danne; Bertrand Cariou; John B Buse; Satish K Garg; Julio Rosenstock; Phillip Banks; Jake A Kushner; Darren K McGuire; Anne L Peters; Sangeeta Sawhney; Paul Strumph
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Small changes in glucose variability induced by low and high glycemic index diets are not associated with changes in β-cell function in adults with pre-diabetes.

Authors:  Kristina M Utzschneider; Tonya N Johnson; Kara L Breymeyer; Lisa Bettcher; Daniel Raftery; Katherine M Newton; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.852

4.  Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Lynn Thomson; Daniela Elleri; Simon Bond; James Howlett; David B Dunger; Kathryn Beardsall
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  People with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia have a delayed reaction to performing a glucose scan during hypoglycaemia: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  O Moser; H Ziko; H Elsayed; D A Hochfellner; T Pöttler; A Mueller; M L Eckstein; H Sourij; J K Mader
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.359

6.  Characterization of Artifact Influence on the Classification of Glucose Time Series Using Sample Entropy Statistics.

Authors:  David Cuesta-Frau; Daniel Novák; Vacláv Burda; Antonio Molina-Picó; Borja Vargas; Milos Mraz; Petra Kavalkova; Marek Benes; Martin Haluzik
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  Functional data analysis and prediction tools for continuous glucose-monitoring studies.

Authors:  Emrah Gecili; Rui Huang; Jane C Khoury; Eileen King; Mekibib Altaye; Katherine Bowers; Rhonda D Szczesniak
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-09-22

8.  Sensing interstitial glucose to nudge active lifestyles (SIGNAL): feasibility of combining novel self-monitoring technologies for persuasive behaviour change.

Authors:  Maxine E Whelan; Andrew P Kingsnorth; Mark W Orme; Lauren B Sherar; Dale W Esliger
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.