OBJECTIVES: Symptoms for which doctors cannot find a clear medical explanation, medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), represent a challenge in medical practice. Recent proposals to define this phenomenon are based on patients' symptom count, without distinguishing between medically explained and unexplained symptoms. We describe how general practitioners (GPs) evaluate multiple and medically unexplained symptoms, and how these dimensions are interconnected. Furthermore, we explore how the number of patient-reported symptoms is associated with the two axes. METHODS: A multi-centre, doctor-patient-linked cross-sectional study in general practice. GPs rated consecutive patients along two 11 point ordinal scales assessing multiple (Multi-scale) and medically unexplained symptoms (MUS-scale). Patients completed a questionnaire addressing 38 symptoms experienced during the previous week and 866 linked questionnaires were available for analysis. RESULTS: GPs used the whole range of the scales, rating only a minority of the patients as "0 (not at all)". The two scales were highly correlated (r=0.80), with a quadratically weighted kappa of 0.73, reflecting substantial agreement between the scales. MUS-scores were highest in middle age. There was a tendency that Multi-scores increased with age and that correlations between the scales decreased with age, in both sexes, although partly non-significant. The number of patient-reported symptoms was moderately correlated with the two scales. CONCLUSION: Multisymptomatology captures MUS as a continuous construct to a great degree in GPs' clinical evaluations, although the two cannot be regarded as the same phenomenon. Patient-reported symptoms seem to be a less valid proxy for MUS.
OBJECTIVES: Symptoms for which doctors cannot find a clear medical explanation, medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), represent a challenge in medical practice. Recent proposals to define this phenomenon are based on patients' symptom count, without distinguishing between medically explained and unexplained symptoms. We describe how general practitioners (GPs) evaluate multiple and medically unexplained symptoms, and how these dimensions are interconnected. Furthermore, we explore how the number of patient-reported symptoms is associated with the two axes. METHODS: A multi-centre, doctor-patient-linked cross-sectional study in general practice. GPs rated consecutive patients along two 11 point ordinal scales assessing multiple (Multi-scale) and medically unexplained symptoms (MUS-scale). Patients completed a questionnaire addressing 38 symptoms experienced during the previous week and 866 linked questionnaires were available for analysis. RESULTS: GPs used the whole range of the scales, rating only a minority of the patients as "0 (not at all)". The two scales were highly correlated (r=0.80), with a quadratically weighted kappa of 0.73, reflecting substantial agreement between the scales. MUS-scores were highest in middle age. There was a tendency that Multi-scores increased with age and that correlations between the scales decreased with age, in both sexes, although partly non-significant. The number of patient-reported symptoms was moderately correlated with the two scales. CONCLUSION: Multisymptomatology captures MUS as a continuous construct to a great degree in GPs' clinical evaluations, although the two cannot be regarded as the same phenomenon. Patient-reported symptoms seem to be a less valid proxy for MUS.
Authors: Melanie Sloan; Rupert Harwood; Stephen Sutton; David D'Cruz; Paul Howard; Chris Wincup; James Brimicombe; Caroline Gordon Journal: Rheumatol Adv Pract Date: 2020-02-26