BACKGROUND: Several published studies have analyzed microbial contamination rates of islet products, ranging from 0% to 16%. However, few studies make reference to potential clinical consequences for transplant recipients and possible impact on islet survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study defines rates of microbiological contamination of islet products under current good manufacturing practice conditions in 164 patients receiving 343 transplants at a single institution. RESULTS: Nineteen (5.5%) islet preparations showed positive microbial growth with a majority (79.4%) due to Gram-positive organisms. The most frequently identified microorganism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (nine of 19 [47.3%]), followed by polymicrobial organisms (eight of 19 [42.1%]). No patient developed signs of clinical infection, and there were no hepatic abscesses evident on imaging by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (none of 19 [0%]), despite the use of potent T-depletional induction. Finally, we could not demonstrate any negative impact of microbiological contamination on long-term islet graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Microbiological contamination of the final islet preparation appears to have little or no effect on patients or on islet survival when appropriate antibiotics are given. However, preparation sterility should be guaranteed at all cost in order maximize patient safety and avoid potential complications in immunosuppressed patients.
BACKGROUND: Several published studies have analyzed microbial contamination rates of islet products, ranging from 0% to 16%. However, few studies make reference to potential clinical consequences for transplant recipients and possible impact on islet survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study defines rates of microbiological contamination of islet products under current good manufacturing practice conditions in 164 patients receiving 343 transplants at a single institution. RESULTS: Nineteen (5.5%) islet preparations showed positive microbial growth with a majority (79.4%) due to Gram-positive organisms. The most frequently identified microorganism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (nine of 19 [47.3%]), followed by polymicrobial organisms (eight of 19 [42.1%]). No patient developed signs of clinical infection, and there were no hepatic abscesses evident on imaging by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (none of 19 [0%]), despite the use of potent T-depletional induction. Finally, we could not demonstrate any negative impact of microbiological contamination on long-term islet graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Microbiological contamination of the final islet preparation appears to have little or no effect on patients or on islet survival when appropriate antibiotics are given. However, preparation sterility should be guaranteed at all cost in order maximize patient safety and avoid potential complications in immunosuppressed patients.
Authors: B L Gala-Lopez; P A Senior; A Koh; S M Kashkoush; T Kawahara; T Kin; A Humar; A M J Shapiro Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2011-09-11 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: A M Shapiro; J R Lakey; E A Ryan; G S Korbutt; E Toth; G L Warnock; N M Kneteman; R V Rajotte Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-07-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Edmond A Ryan; Breay W Paty; Peter A Senior; David Bigam; Eman Alfadhli; Norman M Kneteman; Jonathan R T Lakey; A M James Shapiro Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Edmond A Ryan; Jonathan R T Lakey; Breay W Paty; Sharleen Imes; Gregory S Korbutt; Norman M Kneteman; David Bigam; Ray V Rajotte; A M James Shapiro Journal: Diabetes Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Mustafa Omami; James J McGarrigle; Mick Reedy; Douglas Isa; Sofia Ghani; Enza Marchese; Matthew A Bochenek; Maha Longi; Yuan Xing; Ira Joshi; Yong Wang; José Oberholzer Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Joshua S Jolissaint; Linda W Langman; Claire L DeBolt; Jacob A Tatum; Allison N Martin; Andrew Y Wang; Daniel S Strand; Victor M Zaydfudim; Reid B Adams; Kenneth L Brayman Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Meirigeng Qi; Keiko Omori; Yoko Mullen; Brian McFadden; Luis Valiente; Jemily Juan; Shiela Bilbao; Bernard R Tegtmeier; Donald Dafoe; Fouad Kandeel; Ismail H Al-Abdullah Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2016-02
Authors: Arun Samidurai; Ramzi Ockaili; Chad Cain; Sean K Roh; Scott M Filippone; Donatas Kraskauskas; Rakesh C Kukreja; Anindita Das Journal: iScience Date: 2020-11-26