Literature DB >> 23437804

Pre- and intra-procedural predictors of reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy: an MRI study.

Hubert Cochet1, Arnaud Denis, Sylvain Ploux, Joost Lumens, Sana Amraoui, Nicolas Derval, Frederic Sacher, Patricia Reant, Stéphane Lafitte, Pierre Jais, François Laurent, Philippe Ritter, Michel Montaudon, Pierre Bordachar.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Response rate after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains suboptimal. We sought to identify pre- and intraprocedural predictors of response using MRI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent MRI before CRT. Left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction were assessed on cine images. Intra-LV dyssynchrony was defined as the maximal delay between first peaks of radial wall motion over 20 segments. Myocardial scar extent was quantified using delayed-enhanced MRI. After CRT, the paced LV segment was characterized on preprocedural MRI with respect to presence of scar and mechanical delay, the latter being quantified using time to first peak of wall motion, expressed in percentage of the total LV activation. Echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after CRT to quantify reverse remodeling (RR). Mean RR at 6 months was 30 ± 29% of baseline LV end-systolic volume. At univariate analysis, RR related to baseline LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (R(2) = 0.101, P = 0.01; R(2) = 0.072, P = 0.04), intra-LV mechanical dyssynchrony (R(2) = 0.351, P < 0.0001), scar extent (R(2) = 0.273, P < 0.0001), and presence of scar at pacing site (R(2) = 0.100, P = 0.01). QRS duration and mechanical delay at pacing site were not found related to RR (R(2) = 0.041, P = 0.12 and R(2) = 0.012, P = 0.4, respectively). At multivariate analysis intra-LV mechanical dyssynchrony, scar extent, and LV end-diastolic volume were independent predictors of RR (R(2) = 0.307, P = 0.001; R(2) = 0.096, P = 0.002, R(2) = 0.078, P = 0.005, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Intra-LV dyssynchrony and scar extent are independent predictors of RR after CRT. Scar at pacing site is associated to a lesser response to CRT. Mechanical delay at this site has no impact on the response.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23437804     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  8 in total

1.  Coronary sinus lead delay index for optimization of coronary sinus lead placement.

Authors:  Mevlüt Koç; Onur Kaypakli; Gökhan Gözübüyük; Durmus Yıldıray Şahin
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Recent advances in the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Satish Chandraprakasam; Gina G Mentzer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-02

Review 3.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance in identifying appropriate candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy - a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Jeremy Man Ho Hui; Yan Hiu Athena Lee; Oscar Hou In Chou; Dimitrios Sfairopoulos; Konstantinos Vlachos; Athanasios Saplaouras; Konstantinos P Letsas; Michael Efremidis; Gary Tse; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Relationship between mechanical dyssynchrony and intra-operative electrical delay times in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan D Suever; Gregory R Hartlage; R Patrick Magrath; Shahriar Iravanian; Michael S Lloyd; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Galectin-3 predicts response and outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Clémentine Andre; Eric Piver; Romain Perault; Arnaud Bisson; Julien Pucheux; Emmanuelle Vermes; Bertrand Pierre; Laurent Fauchier; Dominique Babuty; Nicolas Clementy
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Low fibrosis biomarker levels predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response.

Authors:  Grégoire Massoullié; Vincent Sapin; Sylvain Ploux; Patrick Rossignol; Aurélien Mulliez; Frédéric Jean; Pierre-Yves Marie; Charles Merlin; Bruno Pereira; Marius Andronache; Pascal Motreff; Xavier Chabin; Jean-Marc Sellal; Bernard Citron; Jean-René Lusson; Charles Vorilhon; Guillaume Clerfond; Pierre Bordachar; Faiez Zannad; Romain Eschalier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Predictors of echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Martins; Natália António; Helena Donato; Bárbara Oliveiros
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 8.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Role of Multimodality Imaging.

Authors:  Cristian Stătescu; Carina Ureche; Ștefana Enachi; Rodica Radu; Radu A Sascău
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.