Literature DB >> 2343720

Comparison of induction with and first hour of recovery from brief propofol and methohexital anesthesia.

K Boysen1, R Sanchez, J Ravn, E Pedersen, J J Krintel, V Dyrberg.   

Abstract

Anesthesia and recovery during the first hour after propofol and methohexital anesthesia for termination of pregnancy, lasting about 12 min, were compared, the latter in a double-blind manner by means of psychomotor tests (coin counting and continuous auditory reaction time). Muscle movements and hiccups were seen significantly more frequently during methohexital inductions. No differences were seen regarding pain at the site of injection or apnea between the groups. At 15 min after the last dose of anesthetic, recovery after methohexital was ahead of that after propofol, but after 1 h, psychomotor performance was better in the propofol group. Side-effects during recovery were few, and incidences did not differ significantly. Although the difference in reaction time test was significant, it was hardly large enough to be of any clinical importance. Both drugs are useful for brief outpatient anesthesia, but smoother induction gives propofol an edge over methohexital.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Anesthesia--side effects; Biology; Blood Pressure--analysis; Data Analysis; Denmark; Developed Countries; Double-blind Studies; Europe; Examinations And Diagnoses; Hemic System; Incidence; Measurement; Northern Europe; Physiology; Research Methodology; Scandinavia; Studies; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2343720     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03072.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  2 in total

Review 1.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  The effect of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine as anesthetic agents for oocyte pick-up on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes.

Authors:  Özcan Budak; Mehmet Sühha Bostancı; AyçaTaş Tuna; Veysel Toprak; Hüseyin Çakiroğlu; Koray Gök
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.