Literature DB >> 23436844

Predictors of dysplastic nodule diagnosis in patients with liver cirrhosis on unenhanced and gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI with dynamic and hepatobiliary phase.

Emilio Quaia1, Luca De Paoli, Riccardo Pizzolato, Roberta Angileri, Emmanuela Pantano, Ferruccio Degrassi, Maja Ukmar, Maria Assunta Cova.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to assess whether unenhanced and gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI with dynamic and hepatobiliary phase may predict the diagnosis of dysplastic nodules in patients with liver cirrhosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 75 cirrhotic patients (47 men and 28 women; mean [± SD] age, 55 ± 12 years) with 82 hepatocellular nodules, including histology-proven dysplastic nodules (n = 25; diameter, 1-3 cm) and hepatocellular carcinomas (n = 57; diameter, 2-3 cm) scanned by MRI before and after gadobenate dimeglumine injection during hepatic arterial phase (HAP), portal venous phase (PVP), equilibrium phase, and hepatobiliary phase. Nodule T1 and T2 intensities before contrast agent injection and nodule HAP, PVP, equilibrium phase, and hepatobiliary phase intensities were compared with the adjacent liver. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess how the nodule could predict dysplastic nodule diagnosis.
RESULTS: Some imaging findings were independent predictors of dysplastic nodule diagnosis-namely, nodule T2 isohypointensity (odds ratio [OR], 12.28; 95% CI, 3.88-38.82), T1 isohyperintensity (OR, 26.74; 95% CI, 7.53-94.90), HAP isohypointensity (OR, 97.16; 95% CI, 20.06-470.49), PVP-equilibrium phase isohyperintensity (OR, 20.53; 95% CI, 5.36-78.62), and hepatobiliary phase isohyperintensity (OR, 119.6; 95% CI, 21.59-662.40). Nodule T2 and HAP isohypointensity (OR 31.47; 95% CI, 7.88-125.58), nodule T2 isohypointensity and hepatobiliary phase isohyperintensity (OR, 28.77; 95% CI, 7.79-106.19), nodule T1 isohyperintensity and HAP isohypointensity (OR, 17.22; 95% CI, 4.85-61.14), and nodule T1 and hepatobiliary phase isohyperintensity (OR, 19.39; 95% CI, 5.38-69.90) were also predictors of dysplastic nodule diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: The combination of nodule appearance on T2-weighted MRI and nodule enhancement after gadobenate dimeglumine injection may predict dysplastic nodule diagnosis in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23436844     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

Review 1.  Solid liver masses: approach to management from the standpoint of a radiologist.

Authors:  Robert Garrett
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-12

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver: An update.

Authors:  Agnes Watanabe; Miguel Ramalho; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Hye Jin Kim; Fernanda G Velloni; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

3.  Performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of LI-RADS 4 category hepatocellular carcinoma nodules with different diameters.

Authors:  Qi Tang; Cong Ma
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Multi-phase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image-based radiomics-combined machine learning reveals microscopic ultra-early hepatocellular carcinoma lesions.

Authors:  Kui Sun; Liting Shi; Jianfeng Qiu; Yuteng Pan; Ximing Wang; Haiyan Wang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver: diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and evaluation of response to treatment - Part 1.

Authors:  Miguel Ramalho; António P Matos; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Fernanda Velloni; Ersan Altun; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

6.  The powerful "lens" of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of hepatic nodules in patients with cirrhosis: diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma without the need of histopathological confirmation - fact!

Authors:  Andrea Farias de Melo-Leite
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver: diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and evaluation of response to treatment - Part 2.

Authors:  Miguel Ramalho; António P Matos; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Fernanda Velloni; Ersan Altun; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging ancillary features used in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: An illustrative review.

Authors:  David Campos-Correia; João Cruz; António P Matos; Filipa Figueiredo; Miguel Ramalho
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-28

Review 9.  Overall diagnostic accuracy of different MR imaging sequences for detection of dysplastic nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingtong Xiong; Jiawen Luo; Jie Bian; Jianlin Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.