Literature DB >> 23436774

Prevalence of axial spondyloarthritis in United States rheumatology practices: Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria versus rheumatology expert clinical diagnosis.

Vibeke Strand1, Sumati A Rao, Alicia C Shillington, Mary A Cifaldi, Michael McGuire, Eric M Ruderman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: New classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) have been validated by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) working group. We applied these criteria to estimate prevalence of SpA in randomly selected, retrospectively reviewed medical records from representative US rheumatology practices.
METHODS: Rheumatologists from 101 US practices identified at-risk patients, ages 18-44 years, with chronic back pain. Medical records were reviewed against ASAS criteria. The proportion of patients meeting ASAS criteria was compared to an estimate of the total number of at-risk patients treated at participating sites and, following weighting, was extrapolated to 5,520 US rheumatology practices. US Census data were used to estimate national prevalence.
RESULTS: In a sample of 816 randomly selected records, 514 (63%) at-risk patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 59.6-66.3%) met ASAS criteria. By applying this proportion to 1,217,097 Americans estimated at risk, 766,652 were projected to meet ASAS criteria. This projection corresponds to a national prevalence of 0.70% (95% CI 0.38-1.1%) or 701 per 100,000 individuals. The prevalence estimates of ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial SpA are 0.35% (95% CI 0.18-0.554%) and 0.35% (95% CI 0.18-0.554%), respectively. Rheumatologists diagnosed axial SpA in 491 (60%) of those at risk, corresponding to 0.67% (95% CI 0.36-1.01%) prevalence overall. However, of 514 patients meeting ASAS criteria, 124 (24%) were undiagnosed by rheumatologists.
CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic epidemiology study of axial SpA using ASAS criteria. Better recognition of axial symptoms is needed, as rheumatologists' expert clinical diagnoses are not always in agreement with ASAS criteria.
Copyright © 2013 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23436774     DOI: 10.1002/acr.21994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  28 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting MHC genes in spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Maxime Breban; Félicie Costantino; Claudine André; Gilles Chiocchia; Henri-Jean Garchon
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Incorporating natural language processing to improve classification of axial spondyloarthritis using electronic health records.

Authors:  Sizheng Steven Zhao; Chuan Hong; Tianrun Cai; Chang Xu; Jie Huang; Joerg Ermann; Nicola J Goodson; Daniel H Solomon; Tianxi Cai; Katherine P Liao
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 3.  Ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis: recent insights and impact of new classification criteria.

Authors:  Fabian Proft; Denis Poddubnyy
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.346

4.  Diagnostic Prevalence of Ankylosing Spondylitis Using Computerized Health Care Data, 1996 to 2009: Underrecognition in a US Health Care Setting.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Leslie R Harrold; Maryam M Asgari; Atul Deodhar; Craig Salman; Joel M Gelfand; Jashin J Wu; Lisa J Herrinton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2016-07-29

5.  Screening and referral for axial spondyloarthritis--need of the hour.

Authors:  Abhijeet Danve; Atul Deodhar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  The changing clinical picture and epidemiology of spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Astrid van Tubergen
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 20.543

7.  An epidemiological study of the prevalence rate of inflammatory back pain and axial spondyloarthritis in a university in the south of China.

Authors:  Feng Tong; Qing Lv; Aimin Li; Linkai Fang; Zhongxing Luo; Junmei Feng; Jieruo Gu; Zhiming Lin
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 8.  Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: expanding the spectrum of an old disease: A narrative review.

Authors:  Marina Magrey; Sergio Schwartzman; Natasha de Peyrecave; Victor S Sloan; Jeffrey L Stark
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  [Long version on the S3 guidelines for axial spondyloarthritis including Bechterew's disease and early forms, Update 2019 : Evidence-based guidelines of the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) and participating medical scientific specialist societies and other organizations].

Authors:  U Kiltz; J Braun; A Becker; J-F Chenot; M Dreimann; L Hammel; A Heiligenhaus; K-G Hermann; R Klett; D Krause; K-F Kreitner; U Lange; A Lauterbach; W Mau; R Mössner; U Oberschelp; S Philipp; U Pleyer; M Rudwaleit; E Schneider; T L Schulte; J Sieper; A Stallmach; B Swoboda; M Winking
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Personal Experiences with Diagnostic Delay Among Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Catherine E Dube; Kate L Lapane; Katarina A Ferrucci; Ariel L Beccia; Sara K Khan; Esther Yi; Jonathan Kay; Kristine A Kuhn; Alexis Ogdie; Shao-Hsien Liu
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.