Literature DB >> 23436578

Nanomechanics controls neuronal precursors adhesion and differentiation.

Elisa Migliorini1, Jelena Ban, Gianluca Grenci, Laura Andolfi, Alessandro Pozzato, Massimo Tormen, Vincent Torre, Marco Lazzarino.   

Abstract

The ability to control the differentiation of stem cells into specific neuronal types has a tremendous potential for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. In vitro neuronal differentiation can be guided by the interplay of biochemical and biophysical cues. Different strategies to increase the differentiation yield have been proposed, focusing everything on substrate topography, or, alternatively on substrate stiffness. Both strategies demonstrated an improvement of the cellular response. However it was often impossible to separate the topographical and the mechanical contributions. Here we investigate the role of the mechanical properties of nanostructured substrates, aiming at understanding the ultimate parameters which govern the stem cell differentiation. To this purpose a set of different substrates with controlled stiffness and with or without nanopatterning are used for stem cell differentiation. Our results show that the neuronal differentiation yield depends mainly on the substrate mechanical properties while the geometry plays a minor role. In particular nanostructured and flat polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates with comparable stiffness show the same neuronal yield. The improvement in the differentiation yield obtained through surface nanopatterning in the submicrometer scale could be explained as a consequence of a substrate softening effect. Finally we investigate by single cell force spectroscopy the neuronal precursor adhesion on the substrate immediately after seeding, as a possible critical step governing the neuronal differentiation efficiency. We observed that neuronal precursor adhesion depends on substrate stiffness but not on surface structure, and in particular it is higher on softer substrates. Our results suggest that cell-substrate adhesion forces and mechanical response are the key parameters to be considered for substrate design in neuronal regenerative medicine.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23436578     DOI: 10.1002/bit.24880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  10 in total

Review 1.  Stiffness Sensing by Cells.

Authors:  Paul A Janmey; Daniel A Fletcher; Cynthia A Reinhart-King
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Beta Hairpin Peptide Hydrogels as an Injectable Solid Vehicle for Neurotrophic Growth Factor Delivery.

Authors:  Stephan Lindsey; Joseph H Piatt; Peter Worthington; Cem Sönmez; Sameer Satheye; Joel P Schneider; Darrin J Pochan; Sigrid A Langhans
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 3.  From tissue mechanics to transcription factors.

Authors:  Paul A Janmey; Rebecca G Wells; Richard K Assoian; Christopher A McCulloch
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.880

4.  Investigation of adhesion and mechanical properties of human glioma cells by single cell force spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Laura Andolfi; Eugenia Bourkoula; Elisa Migliorini; Anita Palma; Anja Pucer; Miran Skrap; Giacinto Scoles; Antonio Paolo Beltrami; Daniela Cesselli; Marco Lazzarino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Information in a Network of Neuronal Cells: Effect of Cell Density and Short-Term Depression.

Authors:  Valentina Onesto; Carlo Cosentino; Enzo Di Fabrizio; Mario Cesarelli; Francesco Amato; Francesco Gentile
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  ZnO Nanostructure Templates as a Cost-Efficient Mass-Producible Route for the Development of Cellular Networks.

Authors:  Eleni Makarona; Beatrix Peter; Inna Szekacs; Christos Tsamis; Robert Horvath
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Nanomechanical and Morphological AFM Mapping of Normal Tissues and Tumors on Live Brain Slices Using Specially Designed Embedding Matrix and Laser-Shaped Cantilevers.

Authors:  Vladislav M Farniev; Mikhail E Shmelev; Nikita A Shved; Valeriia S Gulaia; Arthur R Biktimirov; Alexey Y Zhizhchenko; Aleksandr A Kuchmizhak; Vadim V Kumeiko
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-19

8.  Can hippocampal neurites and growth cones climb over obstacles?

Authors:  Thuy Linh Lien; Jelena Ban; Massimo Tormen; Elisa Migliorini; Gianluca Grenci; Alessandro Pozzato; Vincent Torre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of the neuropoietic activity of gene-modified versus parental mesenchymal stromal cells and the identification of soluble and extracellular matrix-related neuropoietic mediators.

Authors:  Irina Aizman; Brenna J Tirumalashetty; Michael McGrogan; Casey C Case
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.832

10.  Nano-topography Enhances Communication in Neural Cells Networks.

Authors:  V Onesto; L Cancedda; M L Coluccio; M Nanni; M Pesce; N Malara; M Cesarelli; E Di Fabrizio; F Amato; F Gentile
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.