Literature DB >> 23436558

The cancer psychosocial care matrix: a community-derived evaluative tool for designing quality psychosocial cancer care delivery.

Laura P Forsythe1, Julia H Rowland, Lynne Padgett, Karyl Blaseg, Scott D Siegel, Chad M Dingman, Theresa A Gillis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the Institute of Medicine provided a vision for effective psychosocial care for cancer survivors, limited guidance exists regarding the essential components of comprehensive care or progressive steps for implementing each component. This paper describes the development of a unique tool for assessing capacity to provide quality psychosocial care to cancer survivors and the results of the first implementation of this tool in community settings.
METHODS: The psychosocial working group of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP) developed the Cancer Psychosocial Care Matrix assessment tool. All NCCCP sites (n=30, enrolled in 2007 nd 2010) completed the matrix indicating their capacity for providing psychosocial care at entry into NCCCP ('baseline') after 2 years of NCCCP participation (2007 sites only) and within the coming year ('future aspirations').
RESULTS: At baseline, matrix responses reflected few or no systematic processes in place for most components of comprehensive psychosocial care. However, reported capacity to deliver specific components improved at 2 years post-NCCCP entry for the 2007 sites and in all NCCCP sites' future aspirations.
CONCLUSIONS: With growing demand on cancer centers to meet new metrics of quality care, the psychosocial matrix can help centers systematically identify and develop steps to address gap areas in their capacity to meet these new standards. The Cancer Psychosocial Care Matrix appears to enable evaluation of psychosocial programs, may promote intentions to improve psychosocial services, and can facilitate communication of 'best practices' among cancer centers.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; care delivery; psychosocial; survivorship

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23436558     DOI: 10.1002/pon.3254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  4 in total

1.  Tools to guide the identification and implementation of care consistent with the psychosocial Standards of care.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Mary Jo Kupst; Wendy Pelletier; Anne E Kazak; Amanda L Thompson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 3.838

2.  Framework for planning the delivery of psychosocial oncology services: An American psychosocial oncology society task force report.

Authors:  William F Pirl; Joseph A Greer; Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio; Teresa Deshields; Scott Irwin; Karen Fasciano; Lori Wiener; Tiffany Courtnage; Lynne S Padgett; Jesse R Fann
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.955

3.  The PACT study protocol: a time series study investigating the impact, acceptability and cost of an integrated model for psychosocial screening, care and treatment of patients with urological and head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Afaf Girgis; Brian Kelly; Allison Boyes; Marion Haas; Rosalie Viney; Joseph Descallar; Hayley Candler; Douglas Bellamy; Anthony Proietto
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Critical consideration of assessment methods for clinically significant changes of mental distress after psycho-oncological interventions.

Authors:  Lusine Vaganian; Sonja Bussmann; Alexander L Gerlach; Michael Kusch; Hildegard Labouvie; Jan C Cwik
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 4.035

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.