OBJECTIVE: Alterations in the mechanical loading environment in joints may have both beneficial and detrimental effects on articular cartilage and subchondral bone, and may subsequently influence the development of osteoarthritis (OA). Using an in vivo tibial loading model, the aim of this study was to investigate the adaptive responses of cartilage and bone to mechanical loading and to assess the influence of load level and duration. METHODS: Cyclic compression at peak loads of 4.5N and 9.0N was applied to the left tibial knee joint of adult (26-week-old) C57BL/6 male mice for 1, 2, and 6 weeks. Only 9.0N loading was utilized in young (10-week-old) mice. Changes in articular cartilage and subchondral bone were analyzed by histology and micro-computed tomography. RESULTS: Mechanical loading promoted cartilage damage in both age groups of mice, and the severity of joint damage increased with longer duration of loading. Metaphyseal bone mass increased with loading in young mice, but not in adult mice, whereas epiphyseal cancellous bone mass decreased with loading in both young and adult mice. In both age groups, articular cartilage thickness decreased, and subchondral cortical bone thickness increased in the posterior tibial plateau. Mice in both age groups developed periarticular osteophytes at the tibial plateau in response to the 9.0N load, but no osteophyte formation occurred in adult mice subjected to 4.5N peak loading. CONCLUSION: This noninvasive loading model permits dissection of temporal and topographic changes in cartilage and bone and will enable investigation of the efficacy of treatment interventions targeting joint biomechanics or biologic events that promote OA onset and progression.
OBJECTIVE: Alterations in the mechanical loading environment in joints may have both beneficial and detrimental effects on articular cartilage and subchondral bone, and may subsequently influence the development of osteoarthritis (OA). Using an in vivo tibial loading model, the aim of this study was to investigate the adaptive responses of cartilage and bone to mechanical loading and to assess the influence of load level and duration. METHODS: Cyclic compression at peak loads of 4.5N and 9.0N was applied to the left tibial knee joint of adult (26-week-old) C57BL/6 male mice for 1, 2, and 6 weeks. Only 9.0N loading was utilized in young (10-week-old) mice. Changes in articular cartilage and subchondral bone were analyzed by histology and micro-computed tomography. RESULTS: Mechanical loading promoted cartilage damage in both age groups of mice, and the severity of joint damage increased with longer duration of loading. Metaphyseal bone mass increased with loading in young mice, but not in adult mice, whereas epiphyseal cancellous bone mass decreased with loading in both young and adult mice. In both age groups, articular cartilage thickness decreased, and subchondral cortical bone thickness increased in the posterior tibial plateau. Mice in both age groups developed periarticular osteophytes at the tibial plateau in response to the 9.0N load, but no osteophyte formation occurred in adult mice subjected to 4.5N peak loading. CONCLUSION: This noninvasive loading model permits dissection of temporal and topographic changes in cartilage and bone and will enable investigation of the efficacy of treatment interventions targeting joint biomechanics or biologic events that promote OA onset and progression.
Authors: Maureen E Lynch; Russell P Main; Qian Xu; Daniel J Walsh; Mitchell B Schaffler; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2010-06-24
Authors: Tadashi Hayami; Maureen Pickarski; Ya Zhuo; Gregg A Wesolowski; Gideon A Rodan; Le T Duong Journal: Bone Date: 2005-09-26 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Femke Intema; Yvonne H Sniekers; Harrie Weinans; Marieke E Vianen; Sue A Yocum; Anne-Marie M Zuurmond; Jeroen DeGroot; Floris P Lafeber; Simon C Mastbergen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Reva C Lawrence; David T Felson; Charles G Helmick; Lesley M Arnold; Hyon Choi; Richard A Deyo; Sherine Gabriel; Rosemarie Hirsch; Marc C Hochberg; Gene G Hunder; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffrey N Katz; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Frederick Wolfe Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-01
Authors: J Christopher Fritton; Elizabeth R Myers; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: S M Botter; S S Glasson; B Hopkins; S Clockaerts; H Weinans; J P T M van Leeuwen; G J V M van Osch Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: B A Christiansen; F Guilak; K A Lockwood; S A Olson; A A Pitsillides; L J Sandell; M J Silva; M C H van der Meulen; D R Haudenschild Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: O O Adebayo; F C Ko; P T Wan; S R Goldring; M B Goldring; T M Wright; M C H van der Meulen Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Aaron A Jutila; Donald L Zignego; Bradley K Hwang; Jonathan K Hilmer; Timothy Hamerly; Cody A Minor; Seth T Walk; Ronald K June Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Stuart J Warden; Matthew R Galley; Andrea L Hurd; Jeffrey S Richard; Lydia A George; Elizabeth A Guildenbecher; Rick G Barker; Robyn K Fuchs Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2014 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: H Wang; T Chen; A O Gee; I D Hutchinson; K Stoner; R F Warren; S A Rodeo; S A Maher Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Nilsson Holguin; Michael D Brodt; Michelle E Sanchez; Akhilesh A Kotiya; Matthew J Silva Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2013-05-25 Impact factor: 4.333