Literature DB >> 23436250

Expert anticipation from deceptive action.

Shuji Mori1, Takuro Shimada.   

Abstract

Expertise in sports enhances the ability to anticipate forthcoming events from the observation of a player's actions. In the present study, we investigated whether this ability is applicable to deceptive action. In three experiments, performance at anticipating the direction change of a running opponent was examined with experienced rugby players and novice counterparts. These experiments were conducted with reaction-time and temporal-occlusion tasks, in combination with eye movement recordings and the presentation of filmed actions and their point-light representations. The main finding was that the experienced players were superior to the novices in their anticipation of deceptive actions, although their performance was still impaired by the deception, in comparison with their anticipation of nondeceptive actions. We also found that the experienced players anticipated nondeceptive actions less accurately than the novices, suggesting that the players' expectations of deceptive actions worked negatively on their judgments of nondeceptive actions. The results obtained with the point-light representations closely resembled those obtained with the filmed sequences, indicating that anticipation was based on the kinematics of the running action. These results are discussed in the context of recent developments in research on expertise and deception in sports.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23436250     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0435-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  14 in total

1.  Humans are sensitive to attention control when predicting others' actions.

Authors:  Ana Pesquita; Craig S Chapman; James T Enns
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Control over the processing of the opponent's gaze direction in basketball experts.

Authors:  Matthias Weigelt; Iris Güldenpenning; Yvonne Steggemann-Weinrich; Mustafa Alhaj Ahmad Alaboud; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

3.  Brain regions concerned with the identification of deceptive soccer moves by higher-skilled and lower-skilled players.

Authors:  Michael J Wright; Daniel T Bishop; Robin C Jackson; Bruce Abernethy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Deception Detection in Action: Embodied Simulation in Antisocial Human Interactions.

Authors:  Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 5.  How to Trick Your Opponent: A Review Article on Deceptive Actions in Interactive Sports.

Authors:  Iris Güldenpenning; Wilfried Kunde; Matthias Weigelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-31

6.  Informing, Coordinating, and Performing: A Perspective on Functions of Sensorimotor Communication.

Authors:  Cordula Vesper; Vassilis Sevdalis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Stepovers and Signal Detection: Response Sensitivity and Bias in the Differentiation of Genuine and Deceptive Football Actions.

Authors:  Robin C Jackson; Hayley Barton; Kelly J Ashford; Bruce Abernethy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

8.  High-level context effects on spatial displacement: the effects of body orientation and language on memory.

Authors:  David W Vinson; Drew H Abney; Rick Dale; Teenie Matlock
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-03

9.  Deceptive body movements reverse spatial cueing in soccer.

Authors:  Michael J Wright; Robin C Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Exposing an "Intangible" Cognitive Skill among Collegiate Football Players: Enhanced Interference Control.

Authors:  Scott A Wylie; Theodore R Bashore; Nelleke C Van Wouwe; Emily J Mason; Kevin D John; Joseph S Neimat; Brandon A Ally
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.