BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Immune therapy against amyloid-β appears to be a promising target in Alzheimer disease. However, a dose-related risk for ARIA on FLAIR images thought to represent parenchymal vasogenic edema or sulcal effusion (termed "ARIA-E"), has been observed in clinical trials. To assess the intensity of ARIA-E presentation, an MR imaging scale that is both reproducible and easily implemented would assist in monitoring and evaluating this adverse event. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of a review of existing cases from a phase II bapineuzumab study, a scale was constructed with a 6-point score for the 6 regions on each side of the brain (range, 0-60). Scores would be obtained for both parenchymal and sulcal hyperintensities and frequently co-occurring gyral swelling. Inter-rater reliability between 2 neuroradiologists was evaluated in 20 patients, 10 with known ARIA-E and 10 without, by using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The 2 raters had excellent agreement in the identification of ARIA-E cases. A high inter-rater agreement was observed for scores of parenchymal hyperintensity (ICC = 0.83; 95% CI, 48-96) and sulcal hyperintensity (ICC = 0.89; 95% CI, 63-97) and for the combined scores of the 2 ARIA-E findings (ICC = 0.89; 95% CI, 62-97). Gyral swelling scores were observed to have lower inter-rater agreement (ICC = 0.54; 95% CI, -0.06-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed rating scale provides a reliable and easily implemented instrument to grade ARIA-E imaging findings. We currently do not recommend including swelling.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Immune therapy against amyloid-β appears to be a promising target in Alzheimer disease. However, a dose-related risk for ARIA on FLAIR images thought to represent parenchymal vasogenic edema or sulcal effusion (termed "ARIA-E"), has been observed in clinical trials. To assess the intensity of ARIA-E presentation, an MR imaging scale that is both reproducible and easily implemented would assist in monitoring and evaluating this adverse event. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On the basis of a review of existing cases from a phase II bapineuzumab study, a scale was constructed with a 6-point score for the 6 regions on each side of the brain (range, 0-60). Scores would be obtained for both parenchymal and sulcal hyperintensities and frequently co-occurring gyral swelling. Inter-rater reliability between 2 neuroradiologists was evaluated in 20 patients, 10 with known ARIA-E and 10 without, by using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The 2 raters had excellent agreement in the identification of ARIA-E cases. A high inter-rater agreement was observed for scores of parenchymal hyperintensity (ICC = 0.83; 95% CI, 48-96) and sulcal hyperintensity (ICC = 0.89; 95% CI, 63-97) and for the combined scores of the 2 ARIA-E findings (ICC = 0.89; 95% CI, 62-97). Gyral swelling scores were observed to have lower inter-rater agreement (ICC = 0.54; 95% CI, -0.06-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed rating scale provides a reliable and easily implemented instrument to grade ARIA-E imaging findings. We currently do not recommend including swelling.
Authors: Ronald S Black; Reisa A Sperling; Beth Safirstein; Ruth N Motter; Allan Pallay; Alice Nichols; Michael Grundman Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2010 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Susanne Ostrowitzki; Dennis Deptula; Lennart Thurfjell; Frederik Barkhof; Bernd Bohrmann; David J Brooks; William E Klunk; Elizabeth Ashford; Kisook Yoo; Zhi-Xin Xu; Hansruedi Loetscher; Luca Santarelli Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2011-10-10
Authors: D Schenk; R Barbour; W Dunn; G Gordon; H Grajeda; T Guido; K Hu; J Huang; K Johnson-Wood; K Khan; D Kholodenko; M Lee; Z Liao; I Lieberburg; R Motter; L Mutter; F Soriano; G Shopp; N Vasquez; C Vandevert; S Walker; M Wogulis; T Yednock; D Games; P Seubert Journal: Nature Date: 1999-07-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: L O Wahlund; F Barkhof; F Fazekas; L Bronge; M Augustin; M Sjögren; A Wallin; H Ader; D Leys; L Pantoni; F Pasquier; T Erkinjuntti; P Scheltens Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: D Boche; E Zotova; R O Weller; S Love; J W Neal; R M Pickering; D Wilkinson; C Holmes; J A R Nicoll Journal: Brain Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: S Salloway; R Sperling; S Gilman; N C Fox; K Blennow; M Raskind; M Sabbagh; L S Honig; R Doody; C H van Dyck; R Mulnard; J Barakos; K M Gregg; E Liu; I Lieberburg; D Schenk; R Black; M Grundman Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Steven M Greenberg; Meike W Vernooij; Charlotte Cordonnier; Anand Viswanathan; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Steven Warach; Lenore J Launer; Mark A Van Buchem; Monique Mb Breteler Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Reisa Sperling; Stephen Salloway; David J Brooks; Donatella Tampieri; Jerome Barakos; Nick C Fox; Murray Raskind; Marwan Sabbagh; Lawrence S Honig; Anton P Porsteinsson; Ivan Lieberburg; H Michael Arrighi; Kristen A Morris; Yuan Lu; Enchi Liu; Keith M Gregg; H Robert Brashear; Gene G Kinney; Ronald Black; Michael Grundman Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: S Gilman; M Koller; R S Black; L Jenkins; S G Griffith; N C Fox; L Eisner; L Kirby; M Boada Rovira; F Forette; J-M Orgogozo Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-05-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Daniel L Schwartz; Ian Tagge; Katherine Powers; Sinyeob Ahn; Rohit Bakshi; Peter A Calabresi; R Todd Constable; John Grinstead; Roland G Henry; Govind Nair; Nico Papinutto; Daniel Pelletier; Russell Shinohara; Jiwon Oh; Daniel S Reich; Nancy L Sicotte; William D Rooney Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: P M Cogswell; J A Barakos; F Barkhof; T S Benzinger; C R Jack; T Y Poussaint; C A Raji; V K Ramanan; C T Whitlow Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-08-11 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: Elke Anklam; Martin Iain Bahl; Robert Ball; Richard D Beger; Jonathan Cohen; Suzanne Fitzpatrick; Philippe Girard; Blanka Halamoda-Kenzaoui; Denise Hinton; Akihiko Hirose; Arnd Hoeveler; Masamitsu Honma; Marta Hugas; Seichi Ishida; George En Kass; Hajime Kojima; Ira Krefting; Serguei Liachenko; Yan Liu; Shane Masters; Uwe Marx; Timothy McCarthy; Tim Mercer; Anil Patri; Carmen Pelaez; Munir Pirmohamed; Stefan Platz; Alexandre Js Ribeiro; Joseph V Rodricks; Ivan Rusyn; Reza M Salek; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Primal Silva; Clive N Svendsen; Susan Sumner; Kyung Sung; Danilo Tagle; Li Tong; Weida Tong; Janny van den Eijnden-van-Raaij; Neil Vary; Tao Wang; John Waterton; May Wang; Hairuo Wen; David Wishart; Yinyin Yuan; William Slikker Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2021-11-16
Authors: David M Cash; Jonathan D Rohrer; Natalie S Ryan; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick C Fox Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Susanne Ostrowitzki; Robert A Lasser; Ernest Dorflinger; Philip Scheltens; Frederik Barkhof; Tania Nikolcheva; Elizabeth Ashford; Sylvie Retout; Carsten Hofmann; Paul Delmar; Gregory Klein; Mirjana Andjelkovic; Bruno Dubois; Mercè Boada; Kaj Blennow; Luca Santarelli; Paulo Fontoura Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Roland M Martens; Arianne Bechten; Silvia Ingala; Ronald A van Schijndel; Vania B Machado; Marcus C de Jong; Esther Sanchez; Derk Purcell; Michael H Arrighi; Robert H Brashear; Mike P Wattjes; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Emilio Merlo Pich; Andreas Jeromin; Giovanni B Frisoni; Derek Hill; Andrew Lockhart; Mark E Schmidt; Martin R Turner; Stefania Mondello; William Z Potter Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 6.982