BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DIPG is among the most devastating brain tumors in children, necessitating the development of novel treatment strategies and advanced imaging markers such as perfusion to adequately monitor clinical trials. This study investigated tumor perfusion and 3D segmented tumor volume as predictive markers for outcome in children with newly diagnosed DIPG. METHODS: Imaging data were assessed at baseline, during, and after RT, and every other month thereafter until tumor progression for 35 patients (ages 2-16 years) with newly diagnosed DIPG enrolled in the phase I clinical study, NCT00472017. Patients were treated with conformal RT and vandetanib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor. RESULTS: Tumor perfusion increased and tumor volume decreased during combined RT and vandetanib therapy. These changes slowly diminished in follow-up scans until tumor progression. However, increased tumor perfusion and decreased tumor volume during combined therapy were associated with longer PFS. Apart from a longer OS for patients who showed elevated tumor perfusion after RT, there was no association for tumor volume and other perfusion variables with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that tumor perfusion may be a useful predictive marker for the assessment of treatment response and tumor progression in children with DIPG treated with both RT and vandetanib. The assessment of tumor perfusion yields valuable information about tumor microvascular status and its response to therapy, which may help better understand the biology of DIPGs and monitor novel treatment strategies in future clinical trials.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DIPG is among the most devastating brain tumors in children, necessitating the development of novel treatment strategies and advanced imaging markers such as perfusion to adequately monitor clinical trials. This study investigated tumor perfusion and 3D segmented tumor volume as predictive markers for outcome in children with newly diagnosed DIPG. METHODS: Imaging data were assessed at baseline, during, and after RT, and every other month thereafter until tumor progression for 35 patients (ages 2-16 years) with newly diagnosed DIPG enrolled in the phase I clinical study, NCT00472017. Patients were treated with conformal RT and vandetanib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor. RESULTS: Tumor perfusion increased and tumor volume decreased during combined RT and vandetanib therapy. These changes slowly diminished in follow-up scans until tumor progression. However, increased tumor perfusion and decreased tumor volume during combined therapy were associated with longer PFS. Apart from a longer OS for patients who showed elevated tumor perfusion after RT, there was no association for tumor volume and other perfusion variables with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that tumor perfusion may be a useful predictive marker for the assessment of treatment response and tumor progression in children with DIPG treated with both RT and vandetanib. The assessment of tumor perfusion yields valuable information about tumor microvascular status and its response to therapy, which may help better understand the biology of DIPGs and monitor novel treatment strategies in future clinical trials.
Authors: Lisa Willats; Soren Christensen; Henry K Ma; Geoffrey A Donnan; Alan Connelly; Fernando Calamante Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: A Gregory Sorensen; Kyrre E Emblem; Pavlina Polaskova; Dominique Jennings; Heisoog Kim; Marek Ancukiewicz; Meiyun Wang; Patrick Y Wen; Percy Ivy; Tracy T Batchelor; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Tina Young Poussaint; Mehmet Kocak; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Roger I Packer; Richard L Robertson; Russell Geyer; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Ian F Pollack; Gilbert Vezina; Robert Zimmerman; Soonmee Cha; Zoltan Patay; James M Boyett; Larry E Kun Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: J Sedlacik; U Löbel; M Kocak; R B Loeffler; J R Reichenbach; A Broniscer; Z Patay; C M Hillenbrand Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ranjodh Singh; Zhiping Zhou; Jamie Tisnado; Sofia Haque; Kyung K Peck; Robert J Young; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Sunitha B Thakur; Mark M Souweidane Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Lucas Moreno; Andrew D J Pearson; Xavier Paoletti; Irene Jimenez; Birgit Geoerger; Pamela R Kearns; C Michel Zwaan; Francois Doz; Andre Baruchel; Josef Vormoor; Michela Casanova; Stefan M Pfister; Bruce Morland; Gilles Vassal Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: James L Leach; James Roebker; Austin Schafer; Joshua Baugh; Brooklyn Chaney; Christine Fuller; Maryam Fouladi; Adam Lane; Renee Doughman; Rachid Drissi; Mariko DeWire-Schottmiller; David S Ziegler; Jane E Minturn; Jordan R Hansford; Stacie S Wang; Michelle Monje-Deisseroth; Paul G Fisher; Nicholas G Gottardo; Hetal Dholaria; Roger Packer; Katherine Warren; Sarah E S Leary; Stewart Goldman; Ute Bartels; Cynthia Hawkins; Blaise V Jones Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: John T Lucas; Brendan J Knapp; Jinsoo Uh; Chia-Ho Hua; Thomas E Merchant; Scott N Hwang; Zoltan Patay; Alberto Broniscer Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 3.649