| Literature DB >> 23435794 |
Rachel L Pullan1, Carol Gitonga, Charles Mwandawiro, Robert William Snow, Simon J Brooker.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To quantify geographical variation in the relative contribution of parasitic infections, socioeconomic factors and malnutrition in the aetiology of anaemia among schoolchildren across Kenya, thereby providing a rational basis for the targeting of an integrated school health package.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23435794 PMCID: PMC3586185 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Definition of included anthropometric indicators, and population-based cut-off values for severity of malnutrition, as defined by the WHO
| Severity of malnutrition (prevalence range for <6 years) (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropometric measurement | Low severity | Medium/high severity | Very high severity | |
| Stunting | Height-for-age Z-score–2 SD | <20 | 20–40 | >40 |
| Wasting | weight-for-height Z-score >–2 SD | <5 | 5–15 | >15 |
| Underweight | weight-for-age | <10 | 10–30 | >30 |
BMI, body mass index.
Figure 1Schematic of adopted analysis strategy. The dual aim of this analysis strategy was to (1) model the impact of risk factors on the children's haemoglobin (Hb) levels, and (2) estimate the adjusted Population Attributable Risk Fraction (PAF) associated with important, modifiable risk factors. This process was repeated at each realisation of the Bayesian hierarchical model to provide posterior mean estimates and credible intervals for all parameters of relevance.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of mean haemoglobin distribution across Kenya, by school. Hb is adjusted for altitude; population density (persons/km2) is shown for reference.
Mean Hb concentration according to infection status, nutritional proxies and other characteristics in 16941 children aged 5–16 years (univariate analysis)
| Variable | Data type and source | Children no. (%) | Mean Hb shift, g/l (SE) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Female | Individual—KHS | 8314 (49.1) | (vs female) | |
| Male | Individual—KHS | 8627 (50.9) | −1.36 (0.28) | <0.001 |
| Age (in years) | Individual—KHS | – | +0.89 (0.11) | <0.001 |
| Socioeconomic indicators | ||||
| Educated household head * | Individual—KHS | 8,333 (49.2) | +0.82 (0.41) | 0.05 |
| Household owns a mobile phone | Individual—KHS | 10 065 (59.4) | +1.42 (0.40) | <0.001 |
| SES quintile | ||||
| Lowest | Individual—KHS | 3,272 (20.4) | (vs. lowest) | |
| Mid (quintiles 2–4) | 9,926 (61.8) | +2.35 (0.50) | <0.001 | |
| Highest | 2,854 (17.8) | +3.07 (0.82) | <0.001 | |
| Urban location | School-level—digital UE map | 1,237 (7.3) | 1.56 (1.52) | 0.3 |
| Current infections | ||||
| | Individual—KHS | 607 (3.6) | −3.36 (0.77) | <0.001 |
| Med/high-intensity hookworm (>100 epg) | Individual—KHS | 931 (5.5) | −2.81 (0.69) | <0.001 |
| Med/high-intensity | Individual—KHS | 799 (4.7) | −3.81 (1.02) | <0.001 |
| Usually sleeps under a net | Individual—KHS | 9,763 (57.6) | −1.78 (0.52) | 0.001 |
| Taken anthelmintic in the previous 6 months | Individual—KHS | 7,494 (44.2) | +1.24 (0.48) | 0.01 |
| Nutritional proxies | ||||
| Wasting in under 5s (%)† | ||||
| Under 5% | Ecological—interpolated from 2008 DHS | 4,027 (23.8) | (vs <5%) | |
| 5–15% | 10 257 (60.6) | −5.58 (1.04) | <0.001 | |
| Over 15% | 2,657 (15.7) | −8.14 (1.21) | <0.001 | |
| Low BMI in adult women (%)† | ||||
| Under 20% | Ecological—interpolated from 2008 DHS | 12 867 (76.0) | (vs. <20%) | |
| Over 20% | 4,072 (24.0) | −1.98 (0.80) | 0.01 | |
| Consumption of iron rich foods in under 5s (%)† | ||||
| Under 25% | Ecological—interpolated from 2008 DHS | 14 572 (86.0) | (vs. <25%) | |
| Over 25% | 2,369 (14.0) | +1.07 (1.24) | 0.4 | |
| School-feeding (SF) status: ‡ | ||||
| Not an SF district | School-level—MoE registers | 3,690 (21.8) | (vs. not SF dist) | |
| SF district—no programme in school | 8,417 (49.7) | −7.34 (1.08) | <0.001 | |
| SF district—programme in school | 4,834 (28.5) | −4.80 (1.19) | <0.001 | |
| Generalised livelihood zone§ | ||||
| Mixed farming | Ecological—FEWSNET | 3,295 (19.5) | (vs. mixed) | |
| Pastoral and agro-pastoral | 4,991 (29.5) | +1.11 (1.45) | 0.4 | |
| Riverine and fishing | 641 (3.8) | +2.08 (2.42) | 0.4 | |
| Medium potential farming | 4,073 (24.0) | −2.93 (1.13) | 0.02 | |
| High potential farming | 3,941 (23.3) | +1.37 (2.14) | 0.2 | |
| Food security status¶ | ||||
| Generally food secure | Ecological—FEWSNET | 2,756 (16.3) | (vs. secure) | |
| Moderately food insecure | 7,755 (45.8) | −3.20 (1.27) | 0.01 | |
| Highly food insecure | 6,048 (35.7) | −6.17 (1.25) | <0.001 | |
| Extremely food insecure | 382 (2.3) | −5.12 (1.52) | 0.001 | |
*Household head educated to primary complete or above (reported).
†Interpolated from Kenya 2008/2009 DHS survey.
‡School included in either the Homegrown School Meals Programme (HGSMP) or Emergency HGSMP 2010 registers.
§Based on the USAID/FEWSNET Generalised Livelihood Zone 2010 Classification for Kenya.
¶Based on the USAID/FEWSNET Food Insecurity Severity Scale for the quarter corresponding to the KSH survey date.
DHS; Kenya Demographic Health Survey conducted in 2008/2009. MoE; Kenya Ministry of Education. FEWSNET; Famine early warning system network; KSH; Kenya School Health survey (conducted in 2008–2010).
Bayesian hierarchical multivariate regression model for haemoglobin levels
| Variable | Mean Hb shift (g/l) | 95% BCI/SD |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline haemoglobin | 117.3 | (113.9, 120.5) |
| Sex (male) | −1.53 | (−1.94, −1.13) |
| Age (in years) | +1.08 | (+0.99, +1.17) |
| SES quintile (vs quintiles 2–4) | ||
| Lowest | −0.56 | (−1.14, +0.02) |
| Highest | 0.25 | (−0.31, +0.86) |
| Med/high-intensity | −1.75 | (−2.92, −0.60) |
| Med/high-intensity hookworm (>100 epg) | −1.03 | (−2.00, −0.02) |
| −3.00 | (−4.29, −1.68) | |
| Med/high hookworm— | −5.56 | (−8.64, −2.67) |
| Wasting in under 5s (vs <5% prevalence) | ||
| 5–15% | −4.39 | (−6.56, −2.09) |
| >15% | −9.74 | (−12.16, −7.45) |
| School-feeding (SF) status: | ||
| SF district—no programme in school | −2.14 | (−4.76, +0.46) |
| SF district—programme in school | −2.78 | (−5.43, −0.21) |
| Random effect terms | ||
| Individual σ2 | 183.6 | (2.02) |
| Spatial σ2 (school-level) | 29.5 | (7.93) |
| Range of spatial correlation (km) | 194 | (99318) |
Figure 3Graph of spatial random-effect (school-level residual) from the multivariate, Bayesian hierarchical model for Hb. Each point represents one school; the posterior mean is shown by the dot and the 95% BCI are represented by the error bars. The horizontal straight line in the middle of the graph represents the overall mean of the residuals, which are zero centred. Inset shows the school locations, shaded by the value of the school-level residual.
Predicted adjusted population attributable risk fractions for key predictors across Kenya
| Population attributable risk fractions by province, % (95% BCI) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central | Coast | Eastern | Nyanza | Rift Valley | Western | |
| Observed prevalence of anaemia | 3.3 | 37.3 | 34.7 | 30.8 | 19.4 | 25.0 |
| PAF for | ||||||
| Med/high-intensity hookworm | n/a | 13.0 (3.7, 23.1) | 5.9 (0, 12.5) | 8.2 (0, 30.0) | 5.0 (0, 12.5) | 29.0 (1.4, 55.1) |
| Malaria | n/a | 5.8 (2.0, 10.4) | n/a | 27.6 (0, 49.1) | n/a | 23.6 (0, 40.9) |
| Schistosomiasis | n/a | 3.1 (0, 0.08) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Acute malnutrition* | n/a | 18.5 (0, 37.9) | 18.4 (0, 73.0) | n/a | 16.0 (0, 52.5) | n/a |
| Observed prevalence of anaemia | 5.0 | 43.3 | 23.2 | 43.2 | 22.4 | 19.2 |
| PAF for | ||||||
| Med/high-intensity hookworm | n/a | 5.6 (1.0, 10.3) | n/a | 11.0 (0, 21.6) | 3.4 (0, 6.6) | 13.5 (0, 27.5) |
| Malaria | n/a | 1.5 (0.3, 6.1) | n/a | 14.3 (0, 32.0) | n/a | 15.8 (0, 28.1) |
| Schistosomiasis | n/a | 0 (0, 5.5) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Acute malnutrition* | n/a | 16.4 (0, 33.5) | 16.4 (0, 67.1) | n/a | 14.1 (0, 45.9) | n/a |
Estimates are based on the predicted numbers anaemic in each risk group given by the mean and individual-level SD at each realisation of the Bayesian multivariate model for Hb, and are shown for two demographic groups by Province.
N/a, no children are exposed (ie, prevalence of predictor is zero in this demographic group).
*Exposure to ‘acute malnutrition’, prevalence of wasting in under 5s exceeds 5%.