Literature DB >> 23435778

Analytical techniques to study microbial biofilm on abiotic surfaces: pros and cons of the main techniques currently in use.

F Pantanella1, P Valenti, T Natalizi, D Passeri, F Berlutti.   

Abstract

Biofilm is a bacterial lifestyle widespread in microbial world and represents a concern in health care. Despite the great life expectancy related to advanced health care, the increasing numbers of biofilm-mediated infections remain a significant public health challenge. Moreover, the problem of biofilm-mediated infections becomes much more severe when biofilm colonizes medical devices and biomaterials. The public health risk due to microbial biofilm-related infections is a concern that requires full attention. However, the complexity of biofilm makes difficult its exhaustive analysis. Although biofilm represents a major challenge in both microbiological and hygiene areas, at now methods aimed to analyse biofilm formation and development are not standardized yet. Different methods have been employed to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate biofilm each of which is useful to estimate a peculiar aspect of biofilm lifestyle. In the present review, fifteen assays for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of bacterial biofilm colonizing abiotic substrates, such as medical devices, prosthesis or surfaces for food production together with advantages and limitations of each method were described and compared. Some methods are suited to quantify biofilm matrix while others are capable to evaluate both living and dead cells or quantify exclusively viable cells in biofilm. In particular, colorimetric methods to evaluate biofilm matrix (crystal violet; 1,9-dimethyl methylen blue and fluorescein-di-acetate methods) or viable cells (LIVE/DEAD BacLight, BioTimer Assay, resazurin, tetrazolium hydroxide salt methods) and genetic methods to estimate the bacterial population (PCR and FISH) are reported. Moreover, a section is dedicated to examine the performances of advanced microscopic techniques employed to study microbial biofilms (mass spectrometry; confocal laser scanning microscopy; Raman spectroscopy and electron microscopy). Because of its complexity, an exhaustive study of biofilm requires a combination of different experimental approaches as biochemical, genetic or physical ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23435778     DOI: 10.7416/ai.2013.1904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Ig        ISSN: 1120-9135


  31 in total

Review 1.  Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Maria Magana; Christina Sereti; Anastasios Ioannidis; Courtney A Mitchell; Anthony R Ball; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Michael R Hamblin; Maria Hadjifrangiskou; George P Tegos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Rhodotorula sp. and Trichosporon sp. are more Virulent After a Mixed Biofilm.

Authors:  Isabele Carrilho Jarros; Isabella Letícia Esteves Barros; Andressa Prado; Jakeline Luiz Corrêa; Amanda Milene Malacrida; Melyssa Negri; Terezinha Inez Estivalet Svidzinski
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 3.  Antimicrobial Activity of Various Disinfectants to Clean Thermoplastic Polymeric Appliances in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Kanket Kiatwarawut; Dinesh Rokaya; Irin Sirisoontorn
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.967

4.  Nonthermal Plasma Jet Treatment Negatively Affects the Viability and Structure of Candida albicans SC5314 Biofilms.

Authors:  O Handorf; T Weihe; S Bekeschus; A C Graf; U Schnabel; K Riedel; J Ehlbeck
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Antibiofilm activities of the cinnamon extract against Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Chengrong Lu; Huan Liu; Wendan Shangguan; Song Chen; Qingping Zhong
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 2.552

Review 6.  Gastrointestinal biofilms in health and disease.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Motta; John L Wallace; André G Buret; Céline Deraison; Nathalie Vergnolle
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Evaluation of Anti-Biofilm Capability of Cordycepin Against Candida albicans.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Zejun Pei; Zaixiang Lou; Hongxin Wang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Is biofilm removal properly assessed? Comparison of different quantification methods in a 96-well plate system.

Authors:  Philipp Stiefel; Urs Rosenberg; Jana Schneider; Stefan Mauerhofer; Katharina Maniura-Weber; Qun Ren
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  The BioFilm Ring Test: a Rapid Method for Routine Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation Kinetics.

Authors:  Elodie Olivares; Stéphanie Badel-Berchoux; Christian Provot; Benoît Jaulhac; Gilles Prévost; Thierry Bernardi; François Jehl
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  General Overview on Nontuberculous Mycobacteria, Biofilms, and Human Infection.

Authors:  Sonia Faria; Ines Joao; Luisa Jordao
Journal:  J Pathog       Date:  2015-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.