Literature DB >> 23435595

Associations between voice quality and swallowing function in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer.

Marieke J de Bruijn1, Rico N P M Rinkel, Ingrid C Cnossen, Birgit I Witte, Johannes A Langendijk, C René Leemans, Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between voice quality and swallowing function in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer.
METHODS: Recordings of speech and videofluoroscopy of 51 patients after treatment for oral or oropharyngeal cancer were analysed. Acoustic voice parameters (fundamental frequency (F0), perturbation (jitter %, shimmer %), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), and intensity (extracted from the vowels /a/, /i/, and /u/)) were compared to swallowing function parameters as assessed via videofluoroscopy (oral, oropharyngeal, and total transit time; estimated percent of oral, oropharyngeal, and total residue; oropharyngeal swallowing efficiency (OPSE), and the penetration/aspiration (PA-) scale).
RESULTS: Stepwise multivariate regression analyses revealed that jitter, shimmer, and HNR were not associated with swallowing function. Higher voice intensity in all three vowels /a/, /i/, and /u/ was significantly associated with a higher score on the PA-scale (more penetration and aspiration). Higher voice intensity and F0 were significantly associated with lower OPSE.
CONCLUSION: Higher voice intensity was significantly associated with higher amount of penetration/aspiration, and higher voice intensity and fundamental frequency were significantly associated with swallowing inefficiency. Possible explanations may be found in overcompensation by increased laryngeal muscular strength resulting in increased intensity and pitch during phonation. However, the physiology of associated voice and swallowing function is yet unclear, and more research is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23435595     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1761-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  24 in total

1.  Quantitative voice analysis in the assessment of bulbar involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  D Robert; J Pouget; A Giovanni; J P Azulay; J M Triglia
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Prediction of laryngeal aspiration using voice analysis.

Authors:  Ju Seok Ryu; Seo Rin Park; Kyoung Hyo Choi
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Vocal function following radiation for non-laryngeal versus laryngeal tumors of the head and neck.

Authors:  K Fung; J Yoo; H A Leeper; S Hawkins; H Heeneman; P C Doyle; V M Venkatesan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Swallowing after major surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx: a prospective and longitudinal assessment of patients treated by microvascular soft tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Pepijn A Borggreven; Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw; Rico N Rinkel; Johannes A Langendijk; Jan C Roos; Eric F L David; Remco de Bree; C René Leemans
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Light digital occlusion of the tracheostomy tube: a pilot study of effects on aspiration and biomechanics of the swallow.

Authors:  J A Logemann; B R Pauloski; L Colangelo
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  The probability of correctly predicting subglottic penetration from clinical observations.

Authors:  P Linden; K V Kuhlemeier; C Patterson
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Aspiration, weight loss, and quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors.

Authors:  Bruce H Campbell; Kristine Spinelli; Anne M Marbella; Katherine B Myers; Joan C Kuhn; Peter M Layde
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-09

8.  Oropharyngeal swallow efficiency as a representative measure of swallowing function.

Authors:  A W Rademaker; B R Pauloski; J A Logemann; T K Shanahan
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-04

9.  Aspiration in rehabilitation patients: videofluoroscopy vs bedside clinical assessment.

Authors:  M L Splaingard; B Hutchins; L D Sulton; G Chaudhuri
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  LSVT LOUD and LSVT BIG: Behavioral Treatment Programs for Speech and Body Movement in Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Cynthia Fox; Georg Ebersbach; Lorraine Ramig; Shimon Sapir
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2012-03-15
View more
  2 in total

1.  Pharyngeal Residue and Aspiration and the Relationship with Clinical/Nutritional Status of Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Submitted to Videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  D L Oliveira; E A M Moreira; M B de Freitas; J de A Gonçalves; A M Furkim; P Clavé
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Relationship Between Pharyngeal Residues Assessed by Bolus Residue Scale or Normalized Residue Ratio SCALE and Risk of Aspiration in Head and Neck Cancer Who Underwent Videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Hsin-Hao Liou; Miyuki Hsing-Chun Hsieh; Sheng-Han Tsai; David Shang-Yu Hung; Yi-Jen Chen; Jenn-Ren Hsiao; Cheng-Chih Huang; Chun-Yen Ou; Chan-Chi Chang; Wei-Ting Lee; Sen-Tien Tsai; Shu-Wei Tsai
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.733

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.