Literature DB >> 23434811

A comparison of mass transfer coefficients between trickle-bed, hollow fiber membrane and stirred tank reactors.

James J Orgill1, Hasan K Atiyeh, Mamatha Devarapalli, John R Phillips, Randy S Lewis, Raymond L Huhnke.   

Abstract

Trickle-bed reactor (TBR), hollow fiber membrane reactor (HFR) and stirred tank reactor (STR) can be used in fermentation of sparingly soluble gasses such as CO and H2 to produce biofuels and bio-based chemicals. Gas fermenting reactors must provide high mass transfer capabilities that match the kinetic requirements of the microorganisms used. The present study compared the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (K(tot)A/V(L)) of three reactor types; the TBR with 3 mm and 6 mm beads, five different modules of HFRs, and the STR. The analysis was performed using O2 as the gaseous mass transfer agent. The non-porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) HFR provided the highest K(tot)A/V(L) (1062 h(-1)), followed by the TBR with 6mm beads (421 h(-1)), and then the STR (114 h(-1)). The mass transfer characteristics in each reactor were affected by agitation speed, and gas and liquid flow rates. Furthermore, issues regarding the comparison of mass transfer coefficients are discussed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23434811     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  10 in total

1.  Rethinking biological activation of methane and conversion to liquid fuels.

Authors:  Chad A Haynes; Ramon Gonzalez
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 2.  Engineering Acetogenic Bacteria for Efficient One-Carbon Utilization.

Authors:  Hyeonsik Lee; Jiyun Bae; Sangrak Jin; Seulgi Kang; Byung-Kwan Cho
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 3.  Biological hydrogen methanation systems - an overview of design and efficiency.

Authors:  Davis Rusmanis; Richard O'Shea; David M Wall; Jerry D Murphy
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 4.  Gas Fermentation-A Flexible Platform for Commercial Scale Production of Low-Carbon-Fuels and Chemicals from Waste and Renewable Feedstocks.

Authors:  FungMin Liew; Michael E Martin; Ryan C Tappel; Björn D Heijstra; Christophe Mihalcea; Michael Köpke
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Gas fermentation: cellular engineering possibilities and scale up.

Authors:  Björn D Heijstra; Ching Leang; Alex Juminaga
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.328

6.  Microtiter miniature shaken bioreactor system as a scale-down model for process development of production of therapeutic alpha-interferon2b by recombinant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Joo Shun Tan; Sahar Abbasiliasi; Saeid Kadkhodaei; Yew Joon Tam; Teck-Kim Tang; Yee-Ying Lee; Arbakariya B Ariff
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  CO2 to succinic acid - Estimating the potential of biocatalytic routes.

Authors:  Ulf W Liebal; Lars M Blank; Birgitta E Ebert
Journal:  Metab Eng Commun       Date:  2018-06-28

8.  Critical parameters and procedures for anaerobic cultivation of yeasts in bioreactors and anaerobic chambers.

Authors:  Christiaan Mooiman; Jonna Bouwknegt; Wijb J C Dekker; Sanne J Wiersma; Raúl A Ortiz-Merino; Erik de Hulster; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Enhanced biological fixation of methane for microbial lipid production by recombinant Methylomicrobium buryatense.

Authors:  Qiang Fei; Aaron W Puri; Holly Smith; Nancy Dowe; Philip T Pienkos
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 10.  Towards continuous industrial bioprocessing with solventogenic and acetogenic clostridia: challenges, progress and perspectives.

Authors:  Charlotte Anne Vees; Christian Simon Neuendorf; Stefan Pflügl
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.346

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.